I've seen a few articles about this idea in the last few days. It's controversial because of the cost, of course. But some bicycle advocates were against the idea for other reasons.
"Gliding through the air on a bike might so far be confined to the fantasy realms of singing nannies and aliens in baskets, but riding over rooftops could one day form part of your regular commute to work, if Norman Foster has his way.
"Unveiled this week, in an appropriately light-headed vision for the holiday season, SkyCycle proposes a network of elevated bike paths hoisted aloft above railway lines, allowing you to zip through town blissfully liberated from the roads.
"The project, which has the backing of Network Rail and Transport for London, would see over 220km of car-free routes installed above London's suburban rail network, suspended on pylons above the tracks and accessed at over 200 entrance points. At up to 15 metres wide, each of the ten routes would accommodate 12,000 cyclists per hour and improve journey times by up to 29 minutes, according to the designers...."---By Oliver Wainwright in the guardian.com
What do you think of this proposal? Do you see it as progress for cyclists, or just another scheme to keep us off the public streets? Would you like to ride on the SkyCycle path?