Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Living Car Free Do you live car free or car light? Do you prefer to use alternative transportation (bicycles, walking, other human-powered or public transportation) for everyday activities whenever possible? Discuss your lifestyle here.

User Tag List

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-14-14, 05:52 PM   #101
surreal
Senior Member
 
surreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Bikes:
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by RPK79 View Post
It's like those people who constantly have to tell you they don't own a tv. Just shut up already! No one wants to hear about how you think you're so much better than everyone else because you've chosen some fringe lifestyle.

http://www.theawl.com/2011/07/what-k...e-in-your-life
Checked out your link. I used to be the Shrugger, BITD. But, now I'm the Poseur. Marriage can do that to a Shrugger. Now, in true LCF spirit, allow me to discredit your outdated linked op-ed by saying that ppl who don't own TVs don't bring it up unprompted; we bring it up when some incredibly fascinating co-worker asks us if we've seen a particular episode of some garbage TV program. Or, worse yet, if we've seen a particular commercial. At that point, the proclamation that we don't own a TV is intentionally annoying, b/c it's punitive. If you ask me if I saw a particular Geico ad, you'd best believe that vengeance will be swift and ruthless.

BTW, I'm telling you a little bit about my viewing habits/lack thereof, in part, b/c I have an overdeveloped sense of justice. Link me to a 2.5 year-old, non-funny counter-anti-TV piece on The Awl, and you get what you get.

Last edited by surreal; 01-14-14 at 05:53 PM. Reason: I dunt spll so gud.
surreal is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 06:38 PM   #102
jon c. 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Tallahassee, FL
Bikes:
Posts: 1,984
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roody View Post
Except that this is an Internet forum that was especially created for a lifestyle that you say is fringe. Are you saying that there's something wrong with talking about being carfree...on a carfree website? You might want to rethink that one....
But the thread is about understanding backlash against advocacy, which presumably must include interacting beyond this forum. Certainly if one wishes to succeed in advocacy, one must try to understand what works and what doesn't. It's not whether or not one speaks of being carfree, but how one speaks about it that makes the difference if you wish to persuade the general public.
jon c. is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 06:55 PM   #103
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,526
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roody View Post
Except that this is an Internet forum that was especially created for a lifestyle that you say is fringe. Are you saying that there's something wrong with talking about being carfree...on a carfree website? You might want to rethink that one....
Who gets to define the physical and philosophical attributes and requirements for THE Carfree Lifestyle, beyond not using and/or owning a motor vehicle; You, Ekdog and Tandempower types who want to wrap all sorts of your own personal opinions on not necessarily related cultural, social, and political topics?

Just because you fellows think non related issues (to include anti motorist/motoring ranting) are joined at the hip with a carfree living lifestyle, and this is the appropriate forum to rant and rail about them, doesn't make it so. If somebody else who is car free feels strongly about race relations, or gun control or abortion or any other hot button issue, that does NOT make them carfree living lifestyle issues.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:02 PM   #104
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Just because you fellows think non related issues (to include anti motorist/motoring ranting) are joined at the hip with a carfree living lifestyle, and this is the appropriate forum to rant and rail about them, doesn't make it so. If somebody else who is car free feels strongly about race relations, or gun control or abortion or any other hot button issue, that does NOT make them carfree living lifestyle issues.
"Unrelated" LOL. It's bizarre that you are so indignant that people are daring to discuss why to live car-free, and are proclaiming that we must only discuss how to live car-free.
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Who gets to define the physical and philosophical attributes and requirements for THE Carfree Lifestyle, beyond not using and/or owning a motor vehicle; You, Ekdog and Tandempower types who want to wrap all sorts of your own personal opinions on not necessarily related cultural, social, and political topics?
Yes, and you too if you want to.

Last edited by cooker; 01-14-14 at 07:11 PM.
cooker is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:02 PM   #105
rebel1916
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 2,992
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't have a cable connection. Which means I can't watch TV. I do own one though.
rebel1916 is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:08 PM   #106
GetOuttaMyWay
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jon c. View Post
But the thread is about understanding backlash against advocacy, which presumably must include interacting beyond this forum. Certainly if one wishes to succeed in advocacy, one must try to understand what works and what doesn't. It's not whether or not one speaks of being carfree, but how one speaks about it that makes the difference if you wish to persuade the general public.
And to expand on that, realize that what works for one doesn't necessarily mean that it will work for all.
GetOuttaMyWay is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:18 PM   #107
no1mad
Thunder Whisperer
 
no1mad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE OK
Bikes: '06 Kona Smoke
Posts: 8,662
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rebel1916 View Post
I don't have a cable connection. Which means I can't watch TV. I do own one though.
I have cable and a television (3 actually), but the cable is for internet. I can stream most shows that I'm interested, though finding sports (especially live) has been kinda difficult.
__________________
Community guidelines
no1mad is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:18 PM   #108
GetOuttaMyWay
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
"Unrelated" LOL. It's bizarre that you are so indignant that people are daring to discuss why to live car-free and are proclaiming that we must only discuss how to live car-free.Yes, and you too if you want to.
You want to discuss your motivations for LCF, fine, there is a thread for that I believe, but your reasons for doing so won't help people interested or curious about making the switch themselves.

Sometimes the best way to advocate something is simply to just show others how it is done and not try to convice them why they should do it.
GetOuttaMyWay is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:43 PM   #109
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GetOuttaMyWay View Post
You want to discuss your motivations for LCF, fine, there is a thread for that I believe, but your reasons for doing so won't help people interested or curious about making the switch themselves.

Sometimes the best way to advocate something is simply to just show others how it is done and not try to convice them why they should do it.
Leading by example is a fine thing, but it isn't really "advocacy".
cooker is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:47 PM   #110
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
There's actually a case to be made in any kind of activism, that aggressive, preachy and annoying tactics, that offend a lot of people, still work indirectly. People naturally like to choose a "middle ground" on any issue, and avoid the extremes (and extremists), but the extremes in turn help define where the "middle" actually is. So people who loudly and angrily propose really far out and drastic changes, actually help make the people proposing only moderate changes, seem safe and reasonable.

Last edited by cooker; 01-14-14 at 07:51 PM.
cooker is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 07:52 PM   #111
rebel1916
Senior Member
 
rebel1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Bikes:
Posts: 2,992
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by no1mad View Post
I have cable and a television (3 actually), but the cable is for internet. I can stream most shows that I'm interested, though finding sports (especially live) has been kinda difficult.
When I wanna watch football I go to my firehouse. I get the MotoGP streaming package. I gave up on baseball and hockey years ago. And if there is ever a boxing match I want to see, I go to a bar that's showing it in the back room. The number of shows I want to see in a year can be bought on iTunes for less than the price of one months cable bill. But truth be told, my wife is the one who pulled the trigger. Otherwise I'd probably be watching the same episode of Pawn Stars for the third time right now.
rebel1916 is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 08:17 PM   #112
no1mad
Thunder Whisperer
 
no1mad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE OK
Bikes: '06 Kona Smoke
Posts: 8,662
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 49 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
There's actually a case to be made in any kind of activism, that aggressive, preachy and annoying tactics, that offend a lot of people, still work indirectly. People naturally like to choose a "middle ground" on any issue, and avoid the extremes (and extremists), but the extremes in turn help define where the "middle" actually is. So people who loudly and angrily propose really far out and drastic changes, actually help make the people proposing only moderate changes, seem safe and reasonable.
Like that new guy up in A & S who proposes to replace the personal auto with automated pods running on narrow gauge rails laid on top of the existing streets?

Edit: Clarification- he proposes removing personal autos from city streets and storing them at remote facilities on the outskirts of the rail network so that people could still use them for recreation (joy rides, hunting/fishing/camping, travel) and not eliminate them entirely.

Edit 2: Here is the link to that thread- http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...ystem-possible
__________________
Community guidelines

Last edited by no1mad; 01-14-14 at 08:27 PM.
no1mad is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 10:24 PM   #113
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,526
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
There's actually a case to be made in any kind of activism, that aggressive, preachy and annoying tactics, that offend a lot of people, still work indirectly. People naturally like to choose a "middle ground" on any issue, and avoid the extremes (and extremists), but the extremes in turn help define where the "middle" actually is. So people who loudly and angrily propose really far out and drastic changes, actually help make the people proposing only moderate changes, seem safe and reasonable.
I didn't notice anything in the purpose of this forum anywhere that said this forum was for advocating a carfree lifestyle or any other kind of lifestyle. Nor did I see any call for preaching political, social or environmental activism, extreme or otherwise.

Again, just because some LCF people have ardent positions on these subjects does not make their political/social hobbyhorses carfree subjects or a component of a so-called carfree lifestyle. Nor does the passion of some political activists make their OT rants appropriate as described by the stated forum purpose.

In this specific thread the subject of advocacy seems appropriate, but I believe it is a mistaken assumption of a few pushy advocates for lifestyle and political change, to include "extreme" activism, that their opinions and "activism" on those issues are on topic in any LCF thread, no matter if it has absolutely nothing to do with:

"Did you give up your car for good? Is your bike and public transportation the only way you travel from point A to point B? If your only mode of transportation is your bike, discuss your car-free lifestyle here."
I-Like-To-Bike is offline  
Old 01-14-14, 11:14 PM   #114
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,234
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 135 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
I didn't notice anything in the purpose of this forum anywhere that said this forum was for advocating a carfree lifestyle or any other kind of lifestyle. Nor did I see any call for preaching political, social or environmental activism, extreme or otherwise.

Again, just because some LCF people have ardent positions on these subjects does not make their political/social hobbyhorses carfree subjects or a component of a so-called carfree lifestyle. Nor does the passion of some political activists make their OT rants appropriate as described by the stated forum purpose.

In this specific thread the subject of advocacy seems appropriate, but I believe it is a mistaken assumption of a few pushy advocates for lifestyle and political change, to include "extreme" activism, that their opinions and "activism" on those issues are on topic in any LCF thread, no matter if it has absolutely nothing to do with:

"Did you give up your car for good? Is your bike and public transportation the only way you travel from point A to point B? If your only mode of transportation is your bike, discuss your car-free lifestyle here."
Yet you jump in with your comments and observations and rebuttals on all these inappropriate, off-topic threads...

Last edited by no1mad; 01-15-14 at 01:24 AM. Reason: That last sentence was a bit too harsh.
cooker is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 12:15 AM   #115
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
I didn't notice anything in the purpose of this forum anywhere that said this forum was for advocating a carfree lifestyle or any other kind of lifestyle. Nor did I see any call for preaching political, social or environmental activism, extreme or otherwise.

Again, just because some LCF people have ardent positions on these subjects does not make their political/social hobbyhorses carfree subjects or a component of a so-called carfree lifestyle. Nor does the passion of some political activists make their OT rants appropriate as described by the stated forum purpose.

In this specific thread the subject of advocacy seems appropriate, but I believe it is a mistaken assumption of a few pushy advocates for lifestyle and political change, to include "extreme" activism, that their opinions and "activism" on those issues are on topic in any LCF thread, no matter if it has absolutely nothing to do with:

"Did you give up your car for good? Is your bike and public transportation the only way you travel from point A to point B? If your only mode of transportation is your bike, discuss your car-free lifestyle here."
If you noticed somebody "advocating" or being "political" on an inappropriate thread, by all means call them on it. But I don't believe that happens on this forum, or at most very rarely. I mean, if there is a thread about panniers or cycling routes, for example, I don't see people hijacking it with "political" messages.

I'm not sure why you come on a thread like this one--which is clearly labeled for content--and start with these oft repeated complaints. To me, you are the one who is hijacking.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 12:50 AM   #116
surreal
Senior Member
 
surreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NJ
Bikes:
Posts: 3,084
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Let's be honest; the descriptions of all the various sub-forums tend to be off the mark. That being said, if this one is about "giving up your car for good", then anti-car sentiment is completely on-topic. This isn't the "living bike-rich" forum.... it's about "living car-free". Might as well face it: ppl don't tend to give up items (eg, cars) or activities (eg, driving) that they respect, enjoy, or love.
surreal is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 01:49 AM   #117
GetOuttaMyWay
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
I didn't notice anything in the purpose of this forum anywhere that said this forum was for advocating a carfree lifestyle or any other kind of lifestyle.
I initially thought like this, but then I went and looked up the various ways to define "advocacy". Turns out that like minded individuals that come together to form a support group (and this forum is just that) can be considered a form of advocacy.

That being said, I also tend to share your feelings that a few are a bit too strident in their anti-car mentality.
GetOuttaMyWay is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 01:50 AM   #118
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,765
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandempower View Post
Understanding Backlash Against Car-Free Advocacy
Let me introduce you (and a few others) to the Advocacy and Safety forum.

http://www.bikeforums.net/forumdispl...acy-amp-Safety


If you want to talk about advocacy, there is an entire forum dedicated to that topic. Check it out!
Machka is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 02:03 AM   #119
GetOuttaMyWay
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 45
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roody View Post
If you noticed somebody "advocating" or being "political" on an inappropriate thread, by all means call them on it. But I don't believe that happens on this forum, or at most very rarely. I mean, if there is a thread about panniers or cycling routes, for example, I don't see people hijacking it with "political" messages.

I'm not sure why you come on a thread like this one--which is clearly labeled for content--and start with these oft repeated complaints. To me, you are the one who is hijacking.
Or just maybe it has been happening for so long that you've grown immune to it.

When people start talking about road subsidies/fuel taxes, farm subsidies, and other policies that are set into place and enforced/administered by various governmental agencies- that is political in nature.
GetOuttaMyWay is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 05:05 AM   #120
tandempower
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 1,675
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 84 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
I didn't notice anything in the purpose of this forum anywhere that said this forum was for advocating a carfree lifestyle or any other kind of lifestyle. Nor did I see any call for preaching political, social or environmental activism, extreme or otherwise.

Again, just because some LCF people have ardent positions on these subjects does not make their political/social hobbyhorses carfree subjects or a component of a so-called carfree lifestyle. Nor does the passion of some political activists make their OT rants appropriate as described by the stated forum purpose.

In this specific thread the subject of advocacy seems appropriate, but I believe it is a mistaken assumption of a few pushy advocates for lifestyle and political change, to include "extreme" activism, that their opinions and "activism" on those issues are on topic in any LCF thread, no matter if it has absolutely nothing to do with:

"Did you give up your car for good? Is your bike and public transportation the only way you travel from point A to point B? If your only mode of transportation is your bike, discuss your car-free lifestyle here."
The fact is that whether you're already living car-free or just want to, political issues are a factor insofar as urban planning facilitates or impedes your choice to live car-free. To say that people should just live car free if they want but not express any will for their geographical surroundings to be managed in a way that facilitates their choice, which amounts to facilitating the choice of anyone who is willing to live car free as well, is effectively advocating for anti-car-free interests. Really there is no politically neutral position, unless you consider car-free living neutral insofar as the human body is inalienable and anything else is, well, alienable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GetOuttaMyWay View Post
I initially thought like this, but then I went and looked up the various ways to define "advocacy". Turns out that like minded individuals that come together to form a support group (and this forum is just that) can be considered a form of advocacy.

That being said, I also tend to share your feelings that a few are a bit too strident in their anti-car mentality.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka View Post
Let me introduce you (and a few others) to the Advocacy and Safety forum.

http://www.bikeforums.net/forumdispl...acy-amp-Safety


If you want to talk about advocacy, there is an entire forum dedicated to that topic. Check it out!
Machka's post here is a good example of advocating for the use of separated categories to relegate discussion away from where she doesn't want it to where she does. Machka, when you provided examples of various bike trails with amenities on the other thread, e.g. Harvest Trail, that was effectively advertising and advocating the use of those trails. I know you don't want to think of it that way because you want to have a line between advocacy and 'just normal talk' so you can prize 'normal talk' and decry advocacy, but the reality is that the word, "advocacy" literally means "speaking toward," i.e. ad = toward and vocate = speak. Anti-advocacy is thus also a form of advocacy. If you really don't like advocacy, you should just let things go that you dislike and not say anything. Otherwise you are advocating against them.
tandempower is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 05:09 AM   #121
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by GetOuttaMyWay View Post
Or just maybe it has been happening for so long that you've grown immune to it.

When people start talking about road subsidies/fuel taxes, farm subsidies, and other policies that are set into place and enforced/administered by various governmental agencies- that is political in nature.
I think you misread my post you're responding to. I said that I have never seen a thread about practical cycling matters where somebody suddenly started talking about political issues. The only hijacking I see on this forum is people who come on a so-called political thread to say how much they hate political threads. This is rude and disruptive behavior, as discussed in the forum guidelines.

This forum is is a discussion group about carfree living. This is a subject matter that covers a broad range of topics. Few people will be interested in every topic discussed. It should be a simple matter for people to avoid the topics they're not interested in.

An Internet forum is like a large cocktail party. There are many conversations going on at the same time. Listen briefly at each conversation group. If you find the topic interesting, stay and participate. If the topic is boring to you, move on to the next one. But don't stand there and say, "This is a boring topic. You people must talk about what I want to talk about! Or else I will stand here whining until everybody stops talking! Waah, waah!"
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 05:12 AM   #122
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,765
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tandempower View Post
Machka, when you provided examples of various bike trails with amenities on the other thread, e.g. Harvest Trail, that was effectively advertising and advocating the use of those trails.


Ummmm .... the Harvest Trail isn't a bike trail ... it isn't even a trail.
Machka is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 05:20 AM   #123
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka View Post
Let me introduce you (and a few others) to the Advocacy and Safety forum.

http://www.bikeforums.net/forumdispl...acy-amp-Safety


If you want to talk about advocacy, there is an entire forum dedicated to that topic. Check it out!
Carfree advocacy is off topic on that forum, which I thought you knew. It is for bicycling advocacy only.

Why are you spending so much time advocating against advocacy? How does advocacy harm you personally? The bike trails that you enjoy would not exist if it wasn't for advocacy. The public transit you rely on would not exist if people hadn't advocated for it. Even the sidewalks would not be there if residents didn't advocate for them.

Why do you get so angry and defensive about a normal and valuable part of democracy? Governments have limited revenues. Everybody must speak up and explain why they think their cause is important enough for the government to spend money on it. If you don't speak up, you will never see your good ideas become real.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 05:23 AM   #124
Roody
Sophomoric Member
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,389
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 36 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka View Post


Ummmm .... the Harvest Trail isn't a bike trail ... it isn't even a trail.
That's not his point and it's mean to laugh at people who make a small mistake. Why don't you respond to the point he was making, instead of to a trivial mistake? Are you trying to divert us from your not having a real point? I hope not, but that's what it looks like....
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline  
Old 01-15-14, 05:34 AM   #125
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 45,765
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 89 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roody View Post
That's not his point and it's mean to laugh at people who make a small mistake. Why don't you respond to the point he was making, instead of to a trivial mistake? Are you trying to divert us from your not having a real point? I hope not, but that's what it looks like....
Back when I first mentioned the Harvest Trail, and he asked a bunch of questions about it, I told him to look it up ... and tried to explain what it was. Evidently he wasn't paying any attention.

But my point is ... we've got an 'Advocacy and Safety' forum here ... let's use it for Advocacy topics instead of trying to turn this forum into the little sister of 'Advocacy and Safety'. We don't need two of those forums!
Machka is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.