Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Living Car Free Do you live car free or car light? Do you prefer to use alternative transportation (bicycles, walking, other human-powered or public transportation) for everyday activities whenever possible? Discuss your lifestyle here.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-14, 08:34 PM   #76
Roody
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,578
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ro-monster View Post
Yes, self-discipline is definitely in order. Getting back to the original topic, here is roughly how my metric for that works.

For distances less than 5 miles, personal motor vehicles are never an appropriate choice, with 2 exceptions -- you're too ill or incapacitated to use any other transport right then, or you have to haul something large (by which I mean furniture-sized, not grocery bag-sized).

For distances 5-50 miles, personal motor vehicles are sometimes an appropriate choice, if other means of transportation are simply unavailable or require so much time that they just aren't feasible.

For traveling more than 50 miles, personal motor vehicles are often appropriate, though we could certainly have better public transportation options for this than we have now.
Another way to use restraint (if you have a car) is not to just drive it whenever you feel like it.
  • Plan your trips well in advance, combine trips, wait to go shopping until you need a lot of things.
  • Plan your purchases so you run out of everything at the same time.
  • Get friends and neighbors together in a car pool for shopping.
  • Find stores on your commute route so you don't have to make extra trips.
  • Make a commitment to do all short and spontaneous trips on your bike or on foot.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 08:43 PM   #77
yote223
Senior Member
 
yote223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MN.
Bikes: A MTB and something else with 2 pedals.
Posts: 238
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Raising the ocean levels would at least get rid of two of this country's biggest problems; Both the East and West Coasts. Imho.
yote223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 09:06 PM   #78
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by yote223 View Post
Raising the ocean levels would at least get rid of two of this country's biggest problems; Both the East and West Coasts. Imho.
Welcome back! It's hard to stay away, isn't it?

What are your thoughts on the topic under discussion?
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 09:12 PM   #79
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ro-monster View Post
There is now evidence to suggest that the Earth's largest extinction event, the end-Permian extinction, was probably biological in origin, with volcanism only a contributing factor.

Quote from one of numerous articles on the subject:
"The team's research indicates that the catastrophic event was in fact triggered by the tiniest of organisms, a methane-releasing microbe called Methanosarcina. New evidence suggests that at the time of the extinction, the microbes appeared in massive numbers across the world's oceans, spreading vast clouds of the carbon-heavy gas methane into the atmosphere. This had the effect of altering the planet's climate in a way that made it inhospitable to most other forms of life inhabiting Earth at that time.

It was previously believed that the mass extinction, known as the end-Permian extinction, was due to either vast amounts of volcanic activity, a devastating asteroid strike or prolific all-consuming coal fires....
"

Just to be clear, this is a completely different event than the miocene epoch warm period you're talking about, but it does demonstrate how little we know for certain about the causes of past climate fluctuations, and it indicates that biological factors can indeed overshadow the influence of geological factors. Plus it's a fascinating discovery!
There's a hypothetical possiblity the earth could have a methane burp of epoch-ending significance. I wonder what happened to all that end-Permian methane if that actually was a real event.

Last edited by cooker; 04-07-14 at 09:18 PM.
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 09:20 PM   #80
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
Welcome back! It's hard to stay away, isn't it?

What are your thoughts on the topic under discussion?
What is that topic?
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 09:27 PM   #81
yote223
Senior Member
 
yote223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MN.
Bikes: A MTB and something else with 2 pedals.
Posts: 238
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
With numerous Trails within 20-50 miles of home, I'll be keeping my 04 Silverado. With 3 bikes in the back and 2 more on the hitch rack we are off for a day of adventure.
yote223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 10:05 PM   #82
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
What is that topic?
The proper and restrained use of the automobile. And how to file taxes.
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 10:15 PM   #83
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by yote223 View Post
With numerous Trails within 20-50 miles of home, I'll be keeping my 04 Silverado. With 3 bikes in the back and 2 more on the hitch rack we are off for a day of adventure.
Do you think there need to be any voluntary or imposed limits on car use, for the common good?
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 10:46 PM   #84
yote223
Senior Member
 
yote223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MN.
Bikes: A MTB and something else with 2 pedals.
Posts: 238
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Voluntary? that is up to the individual. Imposed? NO WAY.

"The Tree of Liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of Tyrants and Patriots. For that is it's natural manure."
Thomas Jefferson.
yote223 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 11:33 PM   #85
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
The proper and restrained use of the automobile. And how to file taxes.
Oh, based on your and others' posts, I thought the topic being discussed was just another in a long list of thread hijacks for ranting about climate change, fossil fuels and other environmental issues. I must have been misinformed.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-14, 11:56 PM   #86
I-Like-To-Bike
Been Around Awhile
 
I-Like-To-Bike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Posts: 23,846
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
Do you think there need to be any voluntary or imposed limits on car use, for the common good?
I think it far more likely that, if there is going to be any popular push and associated political push for "involuntary restraining" the use of a transportation mode for the "common good" (as seen by the voting public), it will be to limit, restrict or ban use of bicycles on various public streets.
I-Like-To-Bike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 12:26 AM   #87
B. Carfree
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eugene, Oregon
Bikes:
Posts: 6,302
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 86 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
I think it far more likely that, if there is going to be any popular push and associated political push for "involuntary restraining" the use of a transportation mode for the "common good" (as seen by the voting public), it will be to limit, restrict or ban use of bicycles on various public streets.
Attempts at such bans do crop up from time to time. The one in Colorado was struck down last year. There is an attempt in Misery going on right now. I don't think there is as much citizen support for those as their supporters imagine, but we may get to see when one finally passes.

It does pose an interesting legal conflict. The right to use the public right of way to travel is a basic common law right that predates the Constitution. The privilege to drive on the public right of way is not a right. On the surface of it, a privilege does not seem to carry nearly as much weight as a right, but a bike is not the only way to exercise such a right to travel. Fun times.

I think that if we merely required motorists to follow the law or be banned from driving we wouldn't need to have any further discussion since it doesn't appear that very many people can drive lawfully. Of course there would be other impacts from that like underutilized emergency rooms and unemployed cardiologists, but I can live with that.
B. Carfree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 01:53 AM   #88
Roody
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,578
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
There's a hypothetical possiblity the earth could have a methane burp of epoch-ending significance. I wonder what happened to all that end-Permian methane if that actually was a real event.
I don't know what happened to prehistoric methane, but modern methane turns into carbon dioxide within 10 years of being in the atmosphere. So my guess is that's what happened to the Permian stuff.

In today's world, methane exists in a form (called clathrate, IIRC) where it is frozen solid with water. This occurs in the tundra and on the floor of deep oceans. There is concern that it could melt as the climate warms and contribute even more to atmospheric warming.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 01:59 AM   #89
Roody
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,578
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
I think it far more likely that, if there is going to be any popular push and associated political push for "involuntary restraining" the use of a transportation mode for the "common good" (as seen by the voting public), it will be to limit, restrict or ban use of bicycles on various public streets.
That's a good point.

I'd be interested in hearing your opinion. Leaving aside what you think will happen, what do you think should happen as regards restrictions on car usage--whether voluntary or mandated?
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 02:07 AM   #90
Roody
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,578
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Oh, based on your and others' posts, I thought the topic being discussed was just another in a long list of thread hijacks for ranting about climate change, fossil fuels and other environmental issues. I must have been misinformed.
I (the OP) don't see it as a hijack. Environmental problems are clearly a result of car usage, and a major reason for both voluntary and mandated restrictions on car usage.
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"
Roody is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 05:18 AM   #91
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 46,228
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
If I don't respond to posts in this thread for a while it's because of some kind of internet glitch where my browser won't open the last page of the thread.
Rowan is having the same glitch but he has figured out a workaround.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 05:19 AM   #92
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 46,228
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roody View Post
Environmental problems are clearly a result of car usage, and a major reason for both voluntary and mandated restrictions on car usage.
Or not.
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 07:12 AM   #93
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Like-To-Bike View Post
Oh, based on your and others' posts, I thought the topic being discussed was just another in a long list of thread hijacks for ranting about climate change, fossil fuels and other environmental issues. I must have been misinformed.
Those are possible reasons to restrict automobile use, thus, very appropriate to this thread.
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 07:14 AM   #94
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by yote223 View Post
Imposed? NO WAY.
What about imposed restrictions and regulations already in place - speed limits, emission standards, traffic lights, no U-turn signs, safety belts, licensing of drivers and vehicles, etc. - should we remove some or all of them?

Last edited by cooker; 04-08-14 at 08:00 AM.
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 07:33 AM   #95
Machka 
Long Distance Cyclist
 
Machka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: I ride where the thylacine roamed!
Bikes: Lots
Posts: 46,228
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 335 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cooker View Post
What about imposed restrictions and regulations already in place - speed limits, emission standards, traffic lights, no U-turn signs, safety belts, licensing of drivers and vehicles, etc. - should we remove some or all of them?
Sure ... why not?

I seem to recall reading somewhere that an experiment was done where most of those rules were removed ... and people managed traffic situations better than when they had all those rules. Self-preservation kicked in.

You see it in places like Taiwan where it looks like the traffic is utter chaos, but there's actually a method to the madness.

There is already a bit of an overload of rules and regulations in today's society ... the nanny state situation. We don't really want more rules and regulations!
Machka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 07:55 AM   #96
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka View Post
Sure ... why not?

I seem to recall reading somewhere that an experiment was done where most of those rules were removed ... and people managed traffic situations better than when they had all those rules. Self-preservation kicked in.

You see it in places like Taiwan where it looks like the traffic is utter chaos, but there's actually a method to the madness.

There is already a bit of an overload of rules and regulations in today's society ... the nanny state situation. We don't really want more rules and regulations!
Yes, there are experiments in removing controls at some intersections and having people "negotiate" their way through. I'm not sure it would work at high speed highway interchanges - perhaps there we should retain some combination of traffic lights and cloverleafs. As well, multi-lane roads probably will still need defined lane striping, so you can pass traffic in the slower lane without worrying they will drift into your path. Mind you, they manage to use "virtual lanes" on motor race tracks, passing "high" and "low" etc. with hardly any fatal collisions, so maybe lane markings can be dispensed with too.

Or not.

The bottom line is that pretty well everybody is going to agree on some level of regulation or restriction of car use.
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 08:18 AM   #97
lenA
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: West Coast of Wisconsin
Bikes: 2011 Surly LHT 2005 LeMond Zurich
Posts: 665
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
kinda works in big parking lots when they aren't to busy......folks don't always follow the pavement markings
lenA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 08:22 AM   #98
cooker
Prefers Cicero
 
cooker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Bikes: 1984 Trek 520; 1990s Peugeot (Canadian-made) rigid mountain bike; 2007 Bike Friday NWT; misc others
Posts: 10,663
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 492 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lenA View Post
kinda works in big parking lots when they aren't to busy......folks don't always follow the pavement markings
Even there, if I cut across marked spots, I would still be expected to yield to people in the defined driving lanes.
cooker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-14, 01:55 PM   #99
Roody
Sophomoric Member
Thread Starter
 
Roody's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dancing in Lansing
Bikes:
Posts: 23,578
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 169 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machka View Post
Sure ... why not?

I seem to recall reading somewhere that an experiment was done where most of those rules were removed ... and people managed traffic situations better than when they had all those rules. Self-preservation kicked in.

You see it in places like Taiwan where it looks like the traffic is utter chaos, but there's actually a method to the madness.

There is already a bit of an overload of rules and regulations in today's society ... the nanny state situation. We don't really want more rules and regulations!
You would probably feel differently if you were blind or handicapped. Busy streets are already very hard to cross when your sensory skills and mobility are limited in any way. Removing crosswalks and signals would make a bad situation much worse.

No serious people actually advocate removal of traffic controls on busy streets or high speed roads. Maybe you were referring to the concept of shared space, which has been tried on smaller roads that have a lot of pedestrian traffic.

Shared space - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
__________________

"Think Outside the Cage"

Last edited by Roody; 04-08-14 at 03:04 PM.
Roody is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.