Sprawl-free vs. car-free
#26
Sophomoric Member
Thanks! I used to spend $120+ a month on gas. Now it's down to about $5 a month. My monthly bus pass used to cost $144. Now I only pay per ride and the monthly cost is about $20 since I ride to work most of the time. This means I save more than $200 a month. And I'm a lot healthier.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#27
Just a person on bike
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 2,140
Bikes: 2015 Trek 1.1, 2021 Specialized Roubaix, 2022 Tern HSD S+
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 132 Post(s)
Liked 86 Times
in
56 Posts
I'm married with no children. Another reason we moved was that my wife wanted to live closer to the city for "more liveliness." Job-wise, it was kinda funny because the move did get her closer to her job at that time, but then she switched jobs, where her new workplace is closer to our old home. That's about 100 extra miles of driving per month for her. My saving still outweighs it, which is good.
__________________
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
The value of your life doesn't change based on the way you travel. - Dawn Schellenberg (SDOT)
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 799
Bikes: Pacific Reach, Strida
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not all suburbs are created equal. I used to live in one of the most densely populated neighborhoods in San Francisco. I moved to a suburb when my job moved, and discovered that it is much better for biking, has better access to public transportation, and has more amenities within walking distance than my old neighborhood in the city.
There's also a lot of new infill development taking place here, and nearly all of it is higher density multi-family buildings, sometimes mixed with retail and office space. The location on a peninsula tends to contain sprawl, of course, and about half the Peninsula consists of protected open space where no development is allowed.
There's also a lot of new infill development taking place here, and nearly all of it is higher density multi-family buildings, sometimes mixed with retail and office space. The location on a peninsula tends to contain sprawl, of course, and about half the Peninsula consists of protected open space where no development is allowed.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MN.
Posts: 239
Bikes: A MTB and something else with 2 pedals.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No "Sardine Can" for me. How many of you "Car-Free" can hop in the Silverado with bikes in the back and spend a 4 day weekend running the Centennial Trail in the Black Hills of SD?? While "car light", I am NOT going to be told where or where not to live. Many would like to see legislation that would create these so-called "Urban Utopias", it is not for me and many others. It is a little thing called FREEDOM. Those who have served and shed blood for this understand the concept.
#30
Sophomoric Member
Not all suburbs are created equal. I used to live in one of the most densely populated neighborhoods in San Francisco. I moved to a suburb when my job moved, and discovered that it is much better for biking, has better access to public transportation, and has more amenities within walking distance than my old neighborhood in the city.
There's also a lot of new infill development taking place here, and nearly all of it is higher density multi-family buildings, sometimes mixed with retail and office space. The location on a peninsula tends to contain sprawl, of course, and about half the Peninsula consists of protected open space where no development is allowed.
There's also a lot of new infill development taking place here, and nearly all of it is higher density multi-family buildings, sometimes mixed with retail and office space. The location on a peninsula tends to contain sprawl, of course, and about half the Peninsula consists of protected open space where no development is allowed.
And I do know what you mean about all suburbs not being equal. I lived briefly in a suburb that was very walkable, had centrally located shopping and amenities, and express bus service to the city every 20 minutes. Contrast that to some inner city neighborhoods that have no shopping and a local bus downtown only every 45 minutes. This suburb would be the hands down winner for a carfree person or family, in this particular case.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#31
Sophomoric Member
No "Sardine Can" for me. How many of you "Car-Free" can hop in the Silverado with bikes in the back and spend a 4 day weekend running the Centennial Trail in the Black Hills of SD?? While "car light", I am NOT going to be told where or where not to live. Many would like to see legislation that would create these so-called "Urban Utopias", it is not for me and many others. It is a little thing called FREEDOM. Those who have served and shed blood for this understand the concept.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I think he's referring to one of these.
It's no sardine can.
I'd have a "hog tax" placed on such vehicles, take away the subsidies on gasoline and the billions of dollars of subsidies that Big Oil rakes in every year, and stop building freeways out into the far-away exburbs where these "freedom lovers" live. Those measures would go a long way to nipping sprawl in the bud.
It's no sardine can.
I'd have a "hog tax" placed on such vehicles, take away the subsidies on gasoline and the billions of dollars of subsidies that Big Oil rakes in every year, and stop building freeways out into the far-away exburbs where these "freedom lovers" live. Those measures would go a long way to nipping sprawl in the bud.
Last edited by Ekdog; 06-19-14 at 05:24 AM.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 799
Bikes: Pacific Reach, Strida
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I can't hop in a car and go to the Black Hills because, well, I don't have a car and it would be a really long drive anyway! But what I can do from here is get on a regular public transit bus and ride it to the trailhead for a multi-day backpacking trip, without needing a car.
#34
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seville, Spain
Posts: 4,403
Bikes: Brompton M6R, mountain bikes, Circe Omnis+ tandem
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 146 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
I can't hop in a car and go to the Black Hills because, well, I don't have a car and it would be a really long drive anyway! But what I can do from here is get on a regular public transit bus and ride it to the trailhead for a multi-day backpacking trip, without needing a car.
#35
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
329 Posts
Not all suburbs are created equal. I used to live in one of the most densely populated neighborhoods in San Francisco. I moved to a suburb when my job moved, and discovered that it is much better for biking, has better access to public transportation, and has more amenities within walking distance than my old neighborhood in the city.
When I was car-free in Winnipeg, I lived in a suburb about as far away from the centre of the city as you could get ... right next to open countryside. But it was lovely. I had several choices for shopping in different directions, my doctor and physiotherapist were nearby, my library and church were just up the road, there were cafes and restaurants nearby, and work was only 6.7 km away. I could cycle to work quite easily, I could walk to many other places, and there was decent public transportation if I wanted to go a bit further afield. And cycling longer distances was so easy from that location because I could be out in the country and off in any direction within minutes. Living in a relatively remote suburb was ideal.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#36
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
329 Posts
It's a large SUV which could house a number of bicycles.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: MN.
Posts: 239
Bikes: A MTB and something else with 2 pedals.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think he's referring to one of these.
It's no sardine can.
I'd have a "hog tax" placed on such vehicles, take away the subsidies on gasoline and the billions dollars of subsidies that Big Oil rake in every year, and stop building freeways out into the far-away exburbs where these "freedom lovers" live. Those measures would go a long way to nipping sprawl in the bud.
It's no sardine can.
I'd have a "hog tax" placed on such vehicles, take away the subsidies on gasoline and the billions dollars of subsidies that Big Oil rake in every year, and stop building freeways out into the far-away exburbs where these "freedom lovers" live. Those measures would go a long way to nipping sprawl in the bud.
#38
Thunder Whisperer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NE OK
Posts: 8,847
Bikes: '06 Kona Smoke
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 275 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
2 Posts
I'm married with no children. Another reason we moved was that my wife wanted to live closer to the city for "more liveliness." Job-wise, it was kinda funny because the move did get her closer to her job at that time, but then she switched jobs, where her new workplace is closer to our old home. That's about 100 extra miles of driving per month for her. My saving still outweighs it, which is good.
Unfortunately, we have kids and that introduces other variables into the 'where to live' matrix- quality of schools, local crime rate, location/condition of parks, daycare (depending on age of child)... we headed for the outskirts of the city and then on in to a 'burb proper a couple of years after that because it afforded us the best value for space, better schools, and perceived safety.
__________________
Community guidelines
Community guidelines
#39
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
329 Posts
So it made economic sense for the both of you to move closer to work (at the time). Cool .
Unfortunately, we have kids and that introduces other variables into the 'where to live' matrix- quality of schools, local crime rate, location/condition of parks, daycare (depending on age of child)... we headed for the outskirts of the city and then on in to a 'burb proper a couple of years after that because it afforded us the best value for space, better schools, and perceived safety.
Unfortunately, we have kids and that introduces other variables into the 'where to live' matrix- quality of schools, local crime rate, location/condition of parks, daycare (depending on age of child)... we headed for the outskirts of the city and then on in to a 'burb proper a couple of years after that because it afforded us the best value for space, better schools, and perceived safety.
Yes, it gets complicated as soon as you've got more than one person to think about.
Rowan's and my situation adds a different extra variable for us ... we work about 40 km apart. We can't live within walking or easy cycling distance to both our places of employment.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#40
Sophomoric Member
I think we should keep in mind that suburb and sprawl are not the same thing.
A lot of people like suburbs, but I think it's fair to say that everybody hates sprawl. Suburbs can be beautiful places for carfree people and motorists to live. Sprawl is wasted space, inefficient, ugly, not nice for children and other living things.
Referring back to the OP, what can be done to allow spacious suburbs without having as much sprawl?
A lot of people like suburbs, but I think it's fair to say that everybody hates sprawl. Suburbs can be beautiful places for carfree people and motorists to live. Sprawl is wasted space, inefficient, ugly, not nice for children and other living things.
Referring back to the OP, what can be done to allow spacious suburbs without having as much sprawl?
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#41
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
329 Posts
I think we should keep in mind that suburb and sprawl are not the same thing.
A lot of people like suburbs, but I think it's fair to say that everybody hates sprawl. Suburbs can be beautiful places for carfree people and motorists to live. Sprawl is wasted space, inefficient, ugly, not nice for children and other living things.
Referring back to the OP, what can be done to allow spacious suburbs without having as much sprawl?
A lot of people like suburbs, but I think it's fair to say that everybody hates sprawl. Suburbs can be beautiful places for carfree people and motorists to live. Sprawl is wasted space, inefficient, ugly, not nice for children and other living things.
Referring back to the OP, what can be done to allow spacious suburbs without having as much sprawl?
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
#42
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
Discussions and debates about sprawl are often made unclear by the uncertainty of the meaning associated with the phrase. For example, some commentators measure sprawl only with the average number of residential units per acre in a given area. But others associate it with decentralization(spread of population without a well-defined centre), discontinuity (leapfrog development, as defined below), segregation of uses, and so forth.
Urban sprawl - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
#43
New Orleans
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,794
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
My point is those areas of the city are impossibly expensive.
Asia has high density cities-don't think they are tree lined-despite the building being relatively low.
Many streets in NOLA are tree lined- huge trees-actual canopy-but they aren't high density-1,2 stories-with a bit of a yard
We used to have excellent public transportation-trolleys-but not any more.We have a few trolleys but mainly stinky diesel buses(that have lost some of their sooty stench lately)
Maybe folks could post pictures of high density streets neighborhoods or cities??
Yeah post pictures-1000 words etc
#44
In Real Life
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Down under down under
Posts: 52,152
Bikes: Lots
Mentioned: 141 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3203 Post(s)
Liked 595 Times
in
329 Posts
Yes ... to the OP (and Roody) show us examples of what you don't like ... and what you do like.
If you don't have photographs, maybe do up some sketches ... artist's renderings.
__________________
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Rowan
My fave photo threads on BF
Century A Month Facebook Group
Machka's Website
Photo Gallery
Last edited by Machka; 06-19-14 at 07:50 AM.
#45
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
You have a tough sell on this forum! Cars are needed in sprawl zones, and most of us on the carfree forum don't want cars.
The notion that this is a huge country so we can do anything we want has been well proven to be false.
And is this what you mean by "easy access"? As in most of Sprawlsville, the access is easy in a car, difficult on a bike, suicide for a pedestrian!
The notion that this is a huge country so we can do anything we want has been well proven to be false.
And is this what you mean by "easy access"? As in most of Sprawlsville, the access is easy in a car, difficult on a bike, suicide for a pedestrian!
#46
New Orleans
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,794
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
So in your assessment most people prefer sprawl? I.e. they don't just deal with it because that's what they have to deal with but they actually prefer to spend their time driving long distances and getting stuck in traffic? I can't imagine who would advocate sprawl except people who can't think of a better way to make money than automotive industries, insurance, road and parking lot construction and maintenance, etc. Why else would people prefer sprawl to bikeable/walkable living? The only other answer I've thought of for this is that sprawl creates a lifestyle where people are basically invisible in public and they use their motor-vehicles to go from private venue to private venue. To me this seems like a control obsession but to the people that prefer it, public living must seem like a security nightmare.
bird feeder
bees
bird seed thieving squirrels-
the tomatoes(yeah not much on weeding)-
salvia
bird bath somewhat over grown back yard(neighbors have not much say in how you keep your back yard)
Lots of folks want to grow "stuff" and see various "wildlife" bees squirrels raccoons possums worms rats mice snakes doves
high density cities are deserts-or monocultures growing people and pigeons rats
#47
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,942
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,511 Times
in
1,027 Posts
#48
Custom User Title
Join Date: May 2013
Location: SE MN
Posts: 11,239
Bikes: Fuji Roubaix Pro & Quintana Roo Kilo
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2863 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 31 Times
in
14 Posts
I just don't get the take away what you want to get what I want mentality. It's selfish. If you want to live in a dense city with mass transit suitable to your needs then move to one.
#49
New Orleans
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,794
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 157 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
- Close urban freeways
- Land use plans (zoning) that creates green belts around cities
- Zoning that permits infill development to increase density in sprawl zones
- Better public transit in most areas...
- But NO public transit in sprawl zones
- No extension of utilities and roadways
My hunch is that #6 is the most effective and the most easily accomplished. They won't build a new Home Depot if it doesn't have electricity, sewage, and a big ol' road!
The working poor and many lower middle class will be pushed to the crummy perimeter with no public transportation no utilities- poor policing they will be forced to make their way to the rich urban center to work for the more affluent
The GOV subsidized poor will be a bit better off that the working poor-they will live in "projects" just like the 50's-60's 70's etc-
"Metropolis"-but not underground.
We need a solution to economic disparity before we "make more livable cities for the very affluent"
Your solution will be just fine for the affluent-hell Lexus Liberals are usually the ones whining loudest about wanting "livable cities"
but just try to park wind turbines off their coast-Mass-and see how quickly those Lexus Liberals whine about "ruining their views"(many of those folks actually live most of the time in Manhattan-liveable city-the Cape Cod cottages -second homes)
#50
Sophomoric Member
***************************
I found one definition of sprawl that might be useful. (I didn't copy the whole thing because of copyright, so use the link.)
"Sprawl is generally defined as the increased development of land in suburban and rural areas outside of their respective urban centers. This increased development of real estate in the outskirts of towns, villages and metropolitan areas is quite often accompanied by a lack of development, redevelopment or reuse of land within the urban centers themselves....
Framed in other terms, sprawl refers to the slow decentralization of human occupancy. That is, communities are requiring more land and space to supply the same given population with homes, workplaces, shopping locations and recreation spaces."
A Definition of SprawlFramed in other terms, sprawl refers to the slow decentralization of human occupancy. That is, communities are requiring more land and space to supply the same given population with homes, workplaces, shopping locations and recreation spaces."
If you're not fond of this definition, find one or invent one of your own. I'm not even the OP!
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
Last edited by Roody; 06-19-14 at 08:44 AM.