Wait, why can't we live car free?
#51
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado Front Range
Posts: 116
Bikes: Giant Anyroad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The thread started, "I sold the car, I didn't need a car" and ended, "I bought a car and I'm going to use it for business"
???
???
#52
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Its a consideration I've been trying to decide on for the past month and a half and with the advice given here and off line I decided to take the responsible approach and have an inexpensive but reliable car on hand, at least until my fiancee returns. I tried going car free, and probably could have made it work-after all I did for the past 4 months but realized that this type of living only works best in the city with more alternative transportation. Thanks again to the participants of this thread for the unofficial advice
#53
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
Its a consideration I've been trying to decide on for the past month and a half and with the advice given here and off line I decided to take the responsible approach and have an inexpensive but reliable car on hand, at least until my fiancee returns. I tried going car free, and probably could have made it work-after all I did for the past 4 months but realized that this type of living only works best in the city with more alternative transportation. Thanks again to the participants of this thread for the unofficial advice
Your rational decision probably won't satisfy a few LCF ideologues more interested in tilting at political/cultural windmills and/or standing up to "The Man," regardless if specious posturing will likely be considered by any decision maker to be at the expense of the child's welfare.
#54
Sophomoric Member
Thanks for the concise wrap-up on your decision and decision making considerations. Makes sense.
Your rational decision probably won't satisfy a few LCF ideologues more interested in tilting at political/cultural windmills and/or standing up to "The Man," regardless if specious posturing will likely be considered by any decision maker to be at the expense of the child's welfare.
Your rational decision probably won't satisfy a few LCF ideologues more interested in tilting at political/cultural windmills and/or standing up to "The Man," regardless if specious posturing will likely be considered by any decision maker to be at the expense of the child's welfare.
However, for the record, he said he got the car for business reasons, not for the child's welfare. It sounds like the child was safe either way, with or without car ownership. Hopefully, the situation with child protective services resolved itself, as it should have. Not just one child, but the entire community, is at risk if the emergency medical system is as he described it. A plan to drive somebody to a hospital ED is ridiculous, so a personal car should not be considered necessary in this situation.
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
Last edited by Roody; 07-29-14 at 02:05 PM.
#55
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: I'm in Helena Montana again.
Posts: 1,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 19 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Yeah, and the family they ignore because of your assertions may very well be the family that needs intervention the most.
A complaint -- whether malicious or not -- was made, and the investigation has to be made and judged on its merits. I can see both sides here. Mike needs to collect his information and build a sound defence or at least presentation after consulting with with his legal representative.
A complaint -- whether malicious or not -- was made, and the investigation has to be made and judged on its merits. I can see both sides here. Mike needs to collect his information and build a sound defence or at least presentation after consulting with with his legal representative.
We're only as free as far as we can escape government interference. Sad but true.
#56
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado Front Range
Posts: 116
Bikes: Giant Anyroad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This isn't about the Child Welfare organization looking into the matter. It is about them saying he needs a car. They have no legal right to say that. NONE! That would mean that a prerequisite for having children would be car ownership. If that agency wants to buy a car for him and to insure it and to pay for the fuel and expenses then maybe they could make such a statement, but they can't.
We're only as free as far as we can escape government interference. Sad but true.
We're only as free as far as we can escape government interference. Sad but true.
when we left the hospital with our little terrorist, I think the owners manual consisted of a pamphlet on "don't shake a baby" and that was about it. No question of vehicle ownership, car seats, or anything else for that matter.
#57
Senior Member
This isn't about the Child Welfare organization looking into the matter. It is about them saying he needs a car. They have no legal right to say that. NONE! That would mean that a prerequisite for having children would be car ownership. If that agency wants to buy a car for him and to insure it and to pay for the fuel and expenses then maybe they could make such a statement, but they can't.
We're only as free as far as we can escape government interference. Sad but true.
We're only as free as far as we can escape government interference. Sad but true.
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA. USA
Posts: 3,804
Bikes: Surly Long Haul Disc Trucker
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1015 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
This isn't about the Child Welfare organization looking into the matter. It is about them saying he needs a car. They have no legal right to say that. NONE! That would mean that a prerequisite for having children would be car ownership. If that agency wants to buy a car for him and to insure it and to pay for the fuel and expenses then maybe they could make such a statement, but they can't.
We're only as free as far as we can escape government interference. Sad but true.
We're only as free as far as we can escape government interference. Sad but true.
#59
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
Hell yeah indeed. If those stinkin' child welfare agencies want to make sure that a child in a non relative's temporary custody gets vaccinations, goes to school, has a decent home environment, and/or has a guardian willing and capable of making financial and time sacrifices for the child's welfare as well as having a credible plan for transporting the child for medical services and emergencies, sic the ideological junkyard dogs on 'em barking about "moral rights" and "principled stand on important issues."
#60
Sophomoric Member
Hell yeah indeed. If those stinkin' child welfare agencies want to make sure that a child in a non relative's temporary custody gets vaccinations, goes to school, has a decent home environment, and/or has a guardian willing and capable of making financial and time sacrifices for the child's welfare as well as having a credible plan for transporting the child for medical services and emergencies, sic the ideological junkyard dogs on 'em barking about "moral rights" and "principled stand on important issues."
__________________
"Think Outside the Cage"
#61
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
What you "missed" is the thought process of these posters that a guardian's "belief" is paramount and cannot be challenged or investigated by agencies charged with children's welfare, no matter what the "belief" is, or what the effect is on the welfare of the involved children.
#62
Banned
It's unfortunate to read about US individuals with children who are attempting to eliminate automobile ownership, only having the individual to capitulate to certain agencies and businesses rules in requiring auto ownership, and the difficulties that can be imposed by said agencies and businesses if the individual does not comply.
#63
******
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 949
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
To late to really matter, but I checked with a friend in CPS in a rural western NY county, he said he wouldn't care, as long as the kid isn't biking on her own on busy roads, but it's all case worker dependent.
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
#64
Senior Member
Thread Starter
I guess I missed something. I see nothing on this thread about vaccinations, or any of the other issues you mention. The OP didn't claim that protective services had no right to investigate--in fact he granted that they do have that right, IIRC. I think a reasonable person would dispute the caseworker's conclusion that lack of car constitutes a danger to the child. Most reasonable people would agree that driving a seriously sick or injured child to the ED in a private car is not "a credible plan for transporting the child for medical services and emergencies."
Granted I have only been taking care of her by myself for almost a year, I've been in this child's life since she was born, I'm sure if there was a concern for her well-being, her mother wouldn't have made me her legal guardian. I was there for her first step, I patched her up after she fell off her bike while she was learning to ride a 2 wheeler(which I was teaching her to do), I've sat up with her all night when she was sick and couldn't sleep. But now just because I choose to live rural and switch to a bicycle for primary transportation I'm unfit as a parent? Sure I still have some things to learn, who doesn't? Name one perfect parent out there.
I have 8 references from non-relatives (only needed 3), one being the kid's physician, that all attest to my decisions are in the best interest of the child. My lawyer doesn't see a reason why we won't win the lawsuit filed against the caseworker and her supervisor.
#65
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
How would your CPS friend view an emergency plan that is based on taking a sick child to a hospital by bike trailer for a 4 hour trip, especially since emergencies don't always occur in bright sunshine hours or during ideal weather conditions? I believe it gets rather cold in upstate NY, get a bit of snow too. Gets dark at night too. Doubt if there are too many car free bike trails available for such a journey.
#66
******
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 949
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How would your CPS friend view an emergency plan that is based on taking a sick child to a hospital by bike trailer for a 4 hour trip, especially since emergencies don't always occur in bright sunshine hours or during ideal weather conditions? I believe it gets rather cold in upstate NY, get a bit of snow too. Gets dark at night too. Doubt if there are too many car free bike trails available for such a journey.
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
#67
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
#68
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
Just to satisfy inquiring minds why don't you ask your friend, don't forget to mention that a complaint was received by the agency and that the military dependent child is not related to the guardian.
#69
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
I'm guessing too, but if there is a requirement for there to be an emergency plan, as there may be in this situation, I assume that the guardian would have to provide a better, more realistic plan than being dependent on the use of a bike trailer for a 4 hour ride under the best of conditions. Something like neighbors or friends who can provide transportation support; not foolproof, but certainly more realistic and timely than the proposed bike trailer scheme.
#70
******
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 949
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ASKED! Stay tuned for more. Or, don't turn that bat channel? Anyways, you get the gist. Hooray for internet theoreticals!
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
#71
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
Thanks, should be interesting. Certainly more informative/useful than some of the LCF grandstanding/advice offered by some of the responders to the OP.
#72
******
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 949
Bikes: Specalized Tri-Cross
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
We have a whole bunch of Mennonite and Amish people in rural ny that only use horse and buggy for transportation--day and night. If there was a medical obligation for them to get medical treatment, it doesn't mean that they would need to get into a car to do it. As long as the parents are making good efforts towards addressing the child's safety, permanency, and well being, it's not abuse or maltreatment, even if they did take them via bike. Is it the most optimal way of doing it? No. But the government doesn't mandate the highest standards, it just mandates minimum standards.
__________________
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
In the words of Einstein
"And now I think I'll take a bath"
#73
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Colorado Front Range
Posts: 116
Bikes: Giant Anyroad
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ANSWERED
We have a whole bunch of Mennonite and Amish people in rural ny that only use horse and buggy for transportation--day and night. If there was a medical obligation for them to get medical treatment, it doesn't mean that they would need to get into a car to do it. As long as the parents are making good efforts towards addressing the child's safety, permanency, and well being, it's not abuse or maltreatment, even if they did take them via bike. Is it the most optimal way of doing it? No. But the government doesn't mandate the highest standards, it just mandates minimum standards.
We have a whole bunch of Mennonite and Amish people in rural ny that only use horse and buggy for transportation--day and night. If there was a medical obligation for them to get medical treatment, it doesn't mean that they would need to get into a car to do it. As long as the parents are making good efforts towards addressing the child's safety, permanency, and well being, it's not abuse or maltreatment, even if they did take them via bike. Is it the most optimal way of doing it? No. But the government doesn't mandate the highest standards, it just mandates minimum standards.
#75
Been Around Awhile
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burlington Iowa
Posts: 29,950
Bikes: Vaterland and Ragazzi
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Liked 1,517 Times
in
1,031 Posts
ANSWERED
We have a whole bunch of Mennonite and Amish people in rural ny that only use horse and buggy for transportation--day and night. If there was a medical obligation for them to get medical treatment, it doesn't mean that they would need to get into a car to do it. As long as the parents are making good efforts towards addressing the child's safety, permanency, and well being, it's not abuse or maltreatment, even if they did take them via bike. Is it the most optimal way of doing it? No. But the government doesn't mandate the highest standards, it just mandates minimum standards.
We have a whole bunch of Mennonite and Amish people in rural ny that only use horse and buggy for transportation--day and night. If there was a medical obligation for them to get medical treatment, it doesn't mean that they would need to get into a car to do it. As long as the parents are making good efforts towards addressing the child's safety, permanency, and well being, it's not abuse or maltreatment, even if they did take them via bike. Is it the most optimal way of doing it? No. But the government doesn't mandate the highest standards, it just mandates minimum standards.