Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling Do you enjoy centuries, double centuries, brevets, randonnees, and 24-hour time trials? Share ride reports, and exchange training, equipment, and nutrition information specific to long distance cycling. This isn't for tours, this is for endurance events cycling

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-18-06, 03:42 PM   #1
howsteepisit
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
howsteepisit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Eugene, OR
Bikes: Mecian
Posts: 3,667
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 40 Post(s)
Cadence

I know that for racing and fast club riding most experts are suggesting a cadence of 90+ rpm. What kind of cadence do you long distance fans prefer? I was shocked to have got a cadence moniter and find that I am only going along at 70-75 rpm, and 85 seems way fast to me. I am debating if I need to spend the winter in upping my cadence or more just strength and endurance training?
howsteepisit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-06, 04:44 PM   #2
VanceMac
Senior Member
 
VanceMac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Socal
Bikes:
Posts: 4,270
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Through a wide variety of riding over the years (and an even wider degree of fitness levels), I have always found myself most comfortable and most efficient in the low 90's. Everyone is different, but it seems like 80% of the bell curve would fall in the low-80's to low 100's range (just a guess). So without knowing anything else about you or your situation, I would say that it isn't a bad idea to experiment with a higher cadence. Whenever I'm down in that 70-75 range, I feel VERY inefficient -- all anaerobic thigh work, and very little aerobic work.
VanceMac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-06, 06:34 PM   #3
Marylandnewbie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Bikes: Fuji Supreme
Posts: 1,701
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm no expert but I've found I'm most comfortable between about 87 - 93 give or take a little bit. I have a hard time comfortably maintaining 95+. I think as the cadence drops you start to feel it.
Marylandnewbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-06, 06:55 PM   #4
The Octopus 
Senior Member
 
The Octopus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: FL
Bikes: Dolan Forza; IRO Jamie Roy; Giant TCR Comp 1; Specialized Tri-Cross Sport; '91 Cannondale tandem; Fuji Tahoe MTB
Posts: 1,096
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Here's another voice for just playing around with it and ultimately going with works and feels the best for you.

My low gear is 39x23 and that's comfortable to me even in absurdly hilly terrain -- playing with an online cadence computer, I'm usually doing 60rpm on sustained climbs, and as low as 35rpm(!) on the stuff that requires standing to get up it. On the other hand, I'll comfortably run 39x13 up to about 24mph before getting into the big ring -- that's 98rpm. Guess I'm all over the map.
The Octopus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-06, 07:13 PM   #5
markw
Steel is Real.
 
markw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lakeside, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 967
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The guys I've crewed for all had fairly high cadences. Jim Kern spins for hours, and is probably 90+ most of the time. I've been working on my spinning and finding myself with a 90+ cadence most of the time now, where I used to mash. Going to a recumbent makes you learn how to spin as you can't stand for the climbs, and running too big of a gear will fatigue you quickly. I've found running 39/27 on 8% grades not too hard to do, but instead of standing, I drop it to the granny and spin, which will help me recover. 26/27 low with 650c wheels, 6'2" 213lbs today.
markw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-06, 09:10 PM   #6
ericgu
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Bikes:
Posts: 1,941
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For long distance, higher cadence is better - you will use more cardio and tire out your legs less.

I think it's useful to be able to ride at 100-105 if you'd like.
__________________
Eric

2005 Trek 5.2 Madone, Red with Yellow Flames (Beauty)
199x Lemond Tourmalet, Yellow with fenders (Beast)

Read my cycling blog at http://riderx.info/blogs/riderx
Like climbing? Goto http://www.bicycleclimbs.com
ericgu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-06, 02:41 AM   #7
LWaB
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Auld Blighty
Bikes: Early Cannondale tandem, '99 S&S Frezoni Audax, '65 Moulton Stowaway, '52 Claud Butler, TSR30, Brompton
Posts: 2,240
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I find that my cadence drops to around 70 when I am knackered (that's a technical term) but is around 90 when I reasonably fresh and 100+ when I'm trying to keep up on the fixed.
LWaB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-06, 11:06 AM   #8
papawizo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: near Olympia Washington
Bikes: Merckx Team SC, Merckx ti with a lot of miles, Cannondale T1000, Tandem Tuesday
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Interesting information. I focus on longer distances and find that when things are really good I save my legs and spin about 85-95 but, as stated by others , when I am done for, I also, seem to grind slower and slower. In fact, I recover on long rides by focusing on slower speeds with higher spin rates and my whole attitude lifts.
papawizo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-06, 10:29 PM   #9
NomadVW 
部門ニ/自転車オタク
 
NomadVW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Yuma, AZ
Bikes: 2005 Specialized Roubaix Elite, 2005 Specialized FSR XC Comp, 2008 Blue T16, 2009 Blue RC8, Fetish Cycles Road Bike
Posts: 3,172
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
This year I spent a lot of time working on the 95-105rpm range. Even on longer distances, and it appears that - based on looking back at the majority of the season - I ride faster for longer at those ranges than I do for lower than that.

That being said, lately I'm finding I'm back down to around 95 a lot for longer miles, slower. I've had a lot of very hard workouts and a lot more recovery days in between. I did speed work today and I'm rarely below 100 for that.
__________________
Envision, Energize, Enable
NomadVW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:51 PM.