Multiple Questions?
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Magnolia, Texas
Posts: 300
Bikes: Colnago C50, Specialized TriCross Carbon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Multiple Questions?
1st - I have an FSA 48/34 crankset that says it works for 9 or 10 speed. I want to use either Campy 10 or 11sp brifters, and a cog set that goes to 29-32 teeth. What do I need to make that combo work? Tell me brands, and please be as specific as possible.
2nd - I can see it will take some compromises to make a dual chainring setup work in the range I am looking for. Would it be simpler to go with a Triple chainring? What are the disadvantages besides weight? Does it shift crappy? Why such a stigma against the Triple.
I dont need anything bigger than a 48t, but I will need some serious bailout gears.
I have been cycling over 30 yrs and normally just run a matching gruppo, but this time I really need a special setup. Please advise. Thanks
2nd - I can see it will take some compromises to make a dual chainring setup work in the range I am looking for. Would it be simpler to go with a Triple chainring? What are the disadvantages besides weight? Does it shift crappy? Why such a stigma against the Triple.
I dont need anything bigger than a 48t, but I will need some serious bailout gears.
I have been cycling over 30 yrs and normally just run a matching gruppo, but this time I really need a special setup. Please advise. Thanks
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 8 Times
in
7 Posts
The cranks will work fine with any setup. Campy cassettes go up to 29t, no larger. Campy suggests you need a medium cage for 29t, but short cage works fine in practice, though you have to be careful with the chain length.
I like compact gearing, because front shifting is much easier. As you get tired on a long ride, it gets harder to pay attention to trimming the front, making sure you are in the right gear, etc. Using Shimano, I can run a 34t cassette, which gives me as low a gear as I have use for. Some climbs are still tough, but lower gearing won't help with that.
I like compact gearing, because front shifting is much easier. As you get tired on a long ride, it gets harder to pay attention to trimming the front, making sure you are in the right gear, etc. Using Shimano, I can run a 34t cassette, which gives me as low a gear as I have use for. Some climbs are still tough, but lower gearing won't help with that.
#3
Banned.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Uncertain
Posts: 8,651
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I was with you until this point.
OP, one can achieve a big range of gears with a compact, sure. But you won't get the granny gears you can achieve with a triple, ask any touring cyclist. And there are advantages to going with the triple in that having the small chainring up front allows one to have the range while keeping closer ratios on the cassette.
And if you want to go low, it lets you go really low. The last derailleur-equipped touring bike I bought new had a 48-36-24 triple with a 9-speed 13-34 at the back. Now, a randonneur wouldn't need to be that extreme, because typically they aren't fully loaded, as I sometimes was. But it illustrates the point. I never needed a bigger gear than the 48-13, and I could climb anything, even tired and with a full load.
OP, one can achieve a big range of gears with a compact, sure. But you won't get the granny gears you can achieve with a triple, ask any touring cyclist. And there are advantages to going with the triple in that having the small chainring up front allows one to have the range while keeping closer ratios on the cassette.
And if you want to go low, it lets you go really low. The last derailleur-equipped touring bike I bought new had a 48-36-24 triple with a 9-speed 13-34 at the back. Now, a randonneur wouldn't need to be that extreme, because typically they aren't fully loaded, as I sometimes was. But it illustrates the point. I never needed a bigger gear than the 48-13, and I could climb anything, even tired and with a full load.
#5
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,627
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3870 Post(s)
Liked 2,563 Times
in
1,577 Posts
While it's true that a triple can be more finicky to shift, most of the stigma just comes from macho roadies who think low gears make you weak and slow.
__________________
RUSA #7498
Originally Posted by noglider
People in this forum are not typical.
Last edited by ThermionicScott; 05-08-12 at 09:42 AM.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,350 Times
in
936 Posts
I like compact gearing, because front shifting is much easier. As you get tired on a long ride, it gets harder to pay attention to trimming the front, making sure you are in the right gear, etc. Using Shimano, I can run a 34t cassette, which gives me as low a gear as I have use for. Some climbs are still tough, but lower gearing won't help with that.
One advantage of a triple over a compact is that, if it's set up correctly, the gaps between gears are narrower. It might take some extra shifting but you'll be able to find the "right" gear (not always so with a compact due to the larger gaps).
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Far beyond the pale horizon.
Posts: 14,259
Mentioned: 31 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4245 Post(s)
Liked 1,350 Times
in
936 Posts
OP, one can achieve a big range of gears with a compact, sure. But you won't get the granny gears you can achieve with a triple, ask any touring cyclist. And there are advantages to going with the triple in that having the small chainring up front allows one to have the range while keeping closer ratios on the cassette.
And if you want to go low, it lets you go really low. The last derailleur-equipped touring bike I bought new had a 48-36-24 triple with a 9-speed 13-34 at the back. Now, a randonneur wouldn't need to be that extreme, because typically they aren't fully loaded, as I sometimes was. But it illustrates the point. I never needed a bigger gear than the 48-13, and I could climb anything, even tired and with a full load.
#8
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,687 Times
in
2,510 Posts