Search
Notices
Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling Do you enjoy centuries, double centuries, brevets, randonnees, and 24-hour time trials? Share ride reports, and exchange training, equipment, and nutrition information specific to long distance cycling. This isn't for tours, this is for endurance events cycling

new wheels for long distance fitness riding

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-13, 08:15 AM
  #26  
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,398
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,698 Times in 2,518 Posts
apparently the OFG on weight weenie wheels is a matter of concern in the industry. This OFG doesn't want to be walking, I was concerned about that Saturday night
unterhausen is offline  
Old 05-08-13, 09:44 AM
  #27  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 70
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
215 lb with 28mm tires
- I had a set of wheels built with White hubs and DT Swiss rims, 32h laced 3-cross. Absolutely love them so far. The White hubs have been wonderful, bang-for-the buck seems tough to beat. Haven't needed to yet, but supposedly they're fairly easy to service, too.
ILClyde is offline  
Old 05-08-13, 10:54 AM
  #28  
Reeks of aged cotton duck
 
Hydrated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Middle Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,176

Bikes: 2008 Kogswell PR mkII, 1976 Raleigh Professional, 1996 Serotta Atlanta, 1984 Trek 520, 1979 Raleigh Comp GS

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Six jours
Low spoke count wheels don't make much sense to me. The advantage (both in weight and aerodynamics) is so small as to be essentially unmeasurable (seriously, guys, can you honestly say the difference shows up on your bike computers?) but the disadvantages are real: break a spoke or two on a 36 or 32 spoke wheel and at worst you'll have to open the quick release on your brake caliper a bit. Break a spoke or two on a low count wheel and you may be done for the day - I've even seen a few cases where the loss of one or two spokes destabilized the wheel to the point that a crash ensued.
This.

Low spoke count have become popular with everyday cyclists pretty much due to marketing alone. The advantages are virtually unmeasureable for all but the most elite cyclists.

Weight: Low spoke count rims require more material between the holes... so they are heavy. Often heavier than a comparable 32 or 36 hole rim. But people obsess over having fewer spokes... and you usually lose all that weight savings because you have to use a heavier rim.

I have a buddy who swore that his Bontrager wheels were sooooo light... and I knew better. I won $20 when I bet that his 18 spoke rear weighed more than my vintage 36 spoke DuraAce/Mavic Open Pro rear. The difference was striking.

Aerodynamics: It's funny to see people riding expensive low spoke count aerodynamic wheels and wearing a loose baggy jacket. Get the aerodynamic benefits in perspective.
Hydrated is offline  
Old 05-08-13, 11:01 AM
  #29  
Old. Slow. Happy.
 
MileHighMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Boulder County, CO
Posts: 1,797
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Higher spoke count doesn't automagically make a wheel more reliable. I purchased what I thought was a bombproof rear wheel consisting of the following components:
  • 36 Wheelsmith 14g spokes (brass nipples)
  • Velocity Dyad rim
  • Shimano LX hub (135mm OLD)

Despite the high spoke count, the wheel became un-dished in less than 100 miles of use. It turns out that the NDS spokes were grossly under-tensioned. I took the wheel to my local expert (Vecchio's in Boulder), and they properly tensioned and trued the wheel. I sold that bike/wheel, but it was perfect while I owned/rode it.

The wheel builder's skill level is as important, if not more so, than the number of spokes, etc. My most-recent set of wheels are far less conservative than what I normally run. I provided the builder with my weight, riding style, etc, and let him choose basically everything. The end result is a lightweight pair of 24mm-wide clinchers that hold up to my 195 pounds and dirt/gravel roads (spoke count is 24/28).
MileHighMark is offline  
Old 05-08-13, 08:58 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Well, sure. A badly-built wheel is a badly-built wheel, regardless of spoke count. But lots of folks know how to build good wheels - and if one of those fellows builds a wheel with 32 or 36 spokes, it's going to be stronger and more reliable than one with 24.
Six jours is offline  
Old 05-08-13, 09:01 PM
  #31  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 6,401
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Hydrated

Weight: Low spoke count rims require more material between the holes... so they are heavy. Often heavier than a comparable 32 or 36 hole rim. But people obsess over having fewer spokes... and you usually lose all that weight savings because you have to use a heavier rim.
Probably the lightest 700c wheel I have ever encountered was built with a Campy Record hub (old Record, from the 60s), 36 spokes, and a Scheeren rim with a claimed weight of 235 grams. It had been used daily for a couple of decades by the time I examined it, and was still round and true.
Six jours is offline  
Old 05-11-13, 08:27 PM
  #32  
Full Member
 
c.miller64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tampa Fl
Posts: 485

Bikes: Cannondale Six13 Pro, Cannondale Synapse, Felt IA10

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by bikemig
Yeah; I'm skeptical of low spoke wheels as well exactly for this reason. The pay offs are low to non-existent and the downsides are clear.
You could go 3 spoke with HED 3 clinchers and get huge pay offs with no downsides (except cost)
c.miller64 is offline  
Old 05-12-13, 02:34 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
m2tiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach
Posts: 93

Bikes: Lynskey, Helix

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
220 and running velocity race hubs and their fusion rims - 28 front, 32 rear - double butted except non drive side on the rear,, 2 cross front, 3 cross rear - rock solid - running 4000S tires - 23 MM

Last edited by m2tiguy; 05-12-13 at 02:37 AM. Reason: added tires
m2tiguy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cycledude61
Road Cycling
17
04-11-17 06:09 PM
topslop1
Road Cycling
9
04-23-16 05:53 AM
AcornMan
Road Cycling
2
09-21-14 01:05 PM
Barrettscv
Clydesdales/Athenas (200+ lb / 91+ kg)
8
08-26-14 07:37 PM
bikemig
Fifty Plus (50+)
14
10-01-13 07:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.