Your take on "marathon type exercise is bad for you"?
#26
Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My take on it is that the longer rides I do may be bad for me, but the training I do to be able to ride a 600K is most definitely good for me. If I didn't ride, I would probably just sit in front of the TV and eat too much ...
#27
Professional Fuss-Budget
The theory is that repeated "excessive" exercise causes long-term issues, but strong evidence of this isn't showing up in other (epidemiological) studies.
I do think that, as you noted: The evidence is fairly good at this point that you get most of the benefit with a quite moderate dose of exercise, especially if you avoid other sedentary habits (like constant sitting). There is a big difference between that claim, and the idea that going above that "therapeutic dose level" actually causes harm.
#28
Senior Member
it's odd.
The studies about the negative effects likely apply to maybe 1000, 10,000 on the outside, in the us. Very rare.
Yet a lot of people presume it applies to them.
Yet there are numerous studies that show really positive results (admittedly on proxies for longevity) for long duration reasonably low intensity exercise... As well as studies support interval type exercises (again proxies for longevity).
This applies to almost everyone who rides, except perhaps a few those who race seriously, very seriously.
The studies about the negative effects likely apply to maybe 1000, 10,000 on the outside, in the us. Very rare.
Yet a lot of people presume it applies to them.
Yet there are numerous studies that show really positive results (admittedly on proxies for longevity) for long duration reasonably low intensity exercise... As well as studies support interval type exercises (again proxies for longevity).
This applies to almost everyone who rides, except perhaps a few those who race seriously, very seriously.
#29
Senior Member
You can take this for what you want, or do some research, but endurance exercise does get tied in to heart failure in a way you would never expect: sleep apnea. Some triathlon sites can help you find information, as can Mr. Google.
Everyone thinks that apnea only affects overweight people who don't exercise, and the common solution offered for sleep apnea is lose weight and exercise. However, nothing prevents thin and in shape people from having it for other reasons.
How does sleep apnea do heart damage? It really doesn't, but it prevents the heart from repairing damage done by long endurance effort. The way every muscle works is that you harm it by use, and it rebuilds with rest. Sleep apnea prevents the rebuilding. So your heart ever so slowly gets weaker and weaker, until eventual failure. This is not clogged arteries, but failure of the muscle.
Some of the benefits of endurance training worsen the impact. We train our muscles to use oxygen quickly, with low resting respiration and heart rates. So when an apnea occurs, we go longer before attempting another breath, while our muscles burn up the available Oxygen. If you are well trained, your blood oxygen saturation can fall below 90% (the threshhold for issues) Very quickly. The most typical sleep apnea sign, loud snoring may not occur.
I am not saying everyone has sleep apnea, and I am not saying endurance cycling gives it to you. But if you have it and if you are doing significant endurance events (which a century is NOT), you are risking your heart. Talk to any Pulmonologist. They will first discount it, thinking of the majority of patients they see, and if they think about it, you will see the light go on.
How do I know any of this? I got diagnosed with sleep apnea, and started researching like mad, and talking to pulmonologists, and then finding the articles about triathletes and marathoners who die in their sleep of heart failure. And it isn't me assuming they had apnea, but researchers starting to build the link. I was fortunate that my wife, an RN, pointed out that I stop breathing at night. I figured she was full of crap, but I wore an oxygen sensor, and thought all the results were rubbish, until I fixed it. What a difference.
Sorry. Long post. Centuries aren't hurting you. In my experience, certain conditions can translate to heart damage, but not general cycling.
Everyone thinks that apnea only affects overweight people who don't exercise, and the common solution offered for sleep apnea is lose weight and exercise. However, nothing prevents thin and in shape people from having it for other reasons.
How does sleep apnea do heart damage? It really doesn't, but it prevents the heart from repairing damage done by long endurance effort. The way every muscle works is that you harm it by use, and it rebuilds with rest. Sleep apnea prevents the rebuilding. So your heart ever so slowly gets weaker and weaker, until eventual failure. This is not clogged arteries, but failure of the muscle.
Some of the benefits of endurance training worsen the impact. We train our muscles to use oxygen quickly, with low resting respiration and heart rates. So when an apnea occurs, we go longer before attempting another breath, while our muscles burn up the available Oxygen. If you are well trained, your blood oxygen saturation can fall below 90% (the threshhold for issues) Very quickly. The most typical sleep apnea sign, loud snoring may not occur.
I am not saying everyone has sleep apnea, and I am not saying endurance cycling gives it to you. But if you have it and if you are doing significant endurance events (which a century is NOT), you are risking your heart. Talk to any Pulmonologist. They will first discount it, thinking of the majority of patients they see, and if they think about it, you will see the light go on.
How do I know any of this? I got diagnosed with sleep apnea, and started researching like mad, and talking to pulmonologists, and then finding the articles about triathletes and marathoners who die in their sleep of heart failure. And it isn't me assuming they had apnea, but researchers starting to build the link. I was fortunate that my wife, an RN, pointed out that I stop breathing at night. I figured she was full of crap, but I wore an oxygen sensor, and thought all the results were rubbish, until I fixed it. What a difference.
Sorry. Long post. Centuries aren't hurting you. In my experience, certain conditions can translate to heart damage, but not general cycling.
__________________
Momento mori, amor fati.
Momento mori, amor fati.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlantic Beach Florida
Posts: 1,945
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3777 Post(s)
Liked 1,047 Times
in
791 Posts
Speaking of scientific studies...this article attempts to explain why so many are simply junk. https://www.forbes.com/sites/henrymil...ished-is-junk/
#31
Senior Member
Mine is classified as mixed (which means some central and some obstructive), but positional obstructive is the primary problem. What does that mean? When I sleep on my back, my throat closes enough to restrict air flow. This could be an obstruction from the palette, or just relaxed throat muscles. When I sleep on my side, the only issue becomes central, and occurs at a rate deemed normal. So I manage mine by side sleeping.
I think sleep apnea gets ignored or overlooked often. And like any US medical issue, once you get diagnosed, you are in for the railroad route to a standard solution, which is CPAP. In my case, I pushed to see all of the data, had a good Pulmonology NP to work with, and came up with a solution that I would actually implement. When I asked what the specific reason was for the back sleeping issue, you get into testing issues: sleep studies make confirming the apneas easy, but seeing the mechanism would involve internal scanning on a sleeping, relaxed patient. So every case of sleep apnea is best solved by CPAP. Even when it isn't.
I think sleep apnea gets ignored or overlooked often. And like any US medical issue, once you get diagnosed, you are in for the railroad route to a standard solution, which is CPAP. In my case, I pushed to see all of the data, had a good Pulmonology NP to work with, and came up with a solution that I would actually implement. When I asked what the specific reason was for the back sleeping issue, you get into testing issues: sleep studies make confirming the apneas easy, but seeing the mechanism would involve internal scanning on a sleeping, relaxed patient. So every case of sleep apnea is best solved by CPAP. Even when it isn't.
__________________
Momento mori, amor fati.
Momento mori, amor fati.
#32
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Coast, Canada
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
....
How do I know any of this? I got diagnosed with sleep apnea, and started researching like mad, and talking to pulmonologists, and then finding the articles about triathletes and marathoners who die in their sleep of heart failure. And it isn't me assuming they had apnea, but researchers starting to build the link. I was fortunate that my wife, an RN, pointed out that I stop breathing at night. I figured she was full of crap, but I wore an oxygen sensor, and thought all the results were rubbish, until I fixed it. What a difference. ...
How do I know any of this? I got diagnosed with sleep apnea, and started researching like mad, and talking to pulmonologists, and then finding the articles about triathletes and marathoners who die in their sleep of heart failure. And it isn't me assuming they had apnea, but researchers starting to build the link. I was fortunate that my wife, an RN, pointed out that I stop breathing at night. I figured she was full of crap, but I wore an oxygen sensor, and thought all the results were rubbish, until I fixed it. What a difference. ...
These are degrees of OSA. Probably > 50% males over 50 have a degree of OSA.
OSA is associated with all kinds of cardiovascular events, fatal and non fatal. If significant it should be treated. Yes, weight loss and exercise can be effective and yes CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) solves the obstructive problem.
Heart failure caused by OSA is at the far, far, far end of the spectrum; it occurs in untreated Pickwickian type, OSA patients.
The extreme endurance athlete is unlikely, not impossible, but unlikely to have OSA. There are craniofacial abnormalities that can result in OSA.
Unless RollCNY can point to something in a peer reviewed medical journal to the contrary, the link between high intensity exercise, OSA and heart failure resulting in death doesn't exist.
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Coast, Canada
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#34
Senior Member
Ok....sleep apnea is usually (it can be central) obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). One doesn't "stop breathing" per se, one simply obstructs the airway. Snoring is simply a partially obstructed airway.
These are degrees of OSA. Probably > 50% males over 50 have a degree of OSA.
OSA is associated with all kinds of cardiovascular events, fatal and non fatal. If significant it should be treated. Yes, weight loss and exercise can be effective and yes CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) solves the obstructive problem.
Heart failure caused by OSA is at the far, far, far end of the spectrum; it occurs in untreated Pickwickian type, OSA patients.
The extreme endurance athlete is unlikely, not impossible, but unlikely to have OSA. There are craniofacial abnormalities that can result in OSA.
Unless RollCNY can point to something in a peer reviewed medical journal to the contrary, the link between high intensity exercise, OSA and heart failure resulting in death doesn't exist.
These are degrees of OSA. Probably > 50% males over 50 have a degree of OSA.
OSA is associated with all kinds of cardiovascular events, fatal and non fatal. If significant it should be treated. Yes, weight loss and exercise can be effective and yes CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) solves the obstructive problem.
Heart failure caused by OSA is at the far, far, far end of the spectrum; it occurs in untreated Pickwickian type, OSA patients.
The extreme endurance athlete is unlikely, not impossible, but unlikely to have OSA. There are craniofacial abnormalities that can result in OSA.
Unless RollCNY can point to something in a peer reviewed medical journal to the contrary, the link between high intensity exercise, OSA and heart failure resulting in death doesn't exist.
__________________
Momento mori, amor fati.
Momento mori, amor fati.
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: East Coast, Canada
Posts: 91
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unlikely that one would make a connection between endurance athletes and central sleep apnea so I doubt it has been studied.
Quick look on PubMed didn't turn up anything.
G
#36
Lover of Old Chrome Moly
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 2,949
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 23 Times
in
17 Posts
Fixx was obese and a two pack a day smoker for quite a few years before he took up running in his mid-30s. His autopsy disclosed three arteries with substantial blockage, from 70% to 95%. He also had a genetic history (father died of a heart attack at age 43), and an enlarged heart, which his autopsy also disclosed. Not the best example for people who cite the "dangers" of strenuous aerobic activity.
#37
Senior Member
As some of you may know, I recently had a mild heart attack at age 49. I've already heard through the grape vine of people making comments like "see, all that bicycle riding and losing all that weight didn't do him a bit of good". On the contrary, it may have save my life. I didn't do myself any favors in my younger years. My diet was atrocious, I was very overweight, and though I was strong my cardiovascular fitness left a lot to be desired. Add to that a big family history on both sides of both men and women who suffered heart attacks and died of cardiovascular disease at an early age. I'm lucky that my heart attack was very mild with "no significant damage" and my recovery was fast and appears complete. I may still die from heart disease someday, but it won't be because I rode my bicycle too much.
There is positive evidence of cardiac angiogenesis (growing new blood supplies in heart) as a long term acclimation to endurance exercise. This can offset to some extent other damage.
Good Fortune!
#38
Professional Fuss-Budget
A new longitudinal study of ultra-marathoners is out: https://www.plosone.org/article/info%...l.pone.0083867
They looked at 1200 ultra distance runners, ages 18-81, median age 43. Incidents of cancer and heart disease were very low, and they didn't get injured any more than other runners. The biggest issues were apparently... allergies and exercise-induced asthma.
This does not prove causality, and cycling will have different effects than running. But I'd say it is another indicator that while you probably get most of the benefit from moderate amounts of exercise, it is unlikely that endurance sports actually cause harm.
They looked at 1200 ultra distance runners, ages 18-81, median age 43. Incidents of cancer and heart disease were very low, and they didn't get injured any more than other runners. The biggest issues were apparently... allergies and exercise-induced asthma.
This does not prove causality, and cycling will have different effects than running. But I'd say it is another indicator that while you probably get most of the benefit from moderate amounts of exercise, it is unlikely that endurance sports actually cause harm.