Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Long Distance Competition/Ultracycling, Randonneuring and Endurance Cycling Do you enjoy centuries, double centuries, brevets, randonnees, and 24-hour time trials? Share ride reports, and exchange training, equipment, and nutrition information specific to long distance cycling. This isn't for tours, this is for endurance events cycling

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-03-14, 08:49 AM   #1
eithr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
eithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Columbus OH
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Trofeo, 2009 Cannondal Synapse
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Double Century Bike Build - Wheelset Advice

Training for my second two day double century ride (TOSRV in Ohio). Last year was my first time riding the event. I typically do a lot of riding throughout the year, outdoor and indoor. Last year, I took a bike break and trained for a Tough Mudder. Somehow that training plus about 500 miles of road training got me through the 200+ miles (managed 18.5 mph average the first day).

Last year I rode a 1987 feather-weight steel Bianchi Trofeo frame fitted to Velocity Deep Vs and a Campy 10 speed (integrated shifters) drive train. The rig weighs in at about 23 lbs.

I ride with a buddy, who is pretty competitive. He rides an alloy Allez. It was serious work to keep up with him last year. This year I'm doing bike focused training and hoping to show up with a lighter bike build.

I've acquired a Cannondale Synapse (alloy frame, carbon fork). Ultegra 6600 10 speed drive train. Currently shopping for wheels. Seeing a set of Mavic Open Pros and a set of Velocity Deep Vs in my price range. I love the Deep Vs on my Bianchi - very stiff, never go out of true and look so damn cool. Curious if the weight-saving of the Open Pros is worth the diminished cool-factor. Also curious if either one set might be more recommended for the distance and comfort.

Additionally - I'm about 5'6". Last year, because of the Tough Mudder, I was a fit 175 lbs. I'm aiming to be at 155 lbs by the double century this year.

Thoughts?

Last edited by eithr; 03-03-14 at 08:58 AM.
eithr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 09:04 AM   #2
Homeyba
Senior Member
 
Homeyba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Central Coast, California
Bikes: Colnago C-50, Calfee Dragonfly Tandem, Specialized Allez Pro, Peugeot Competition Light
Posts: 3,370
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
No. Stick with the deep v's. Aerodynamics trump light weight anyway.
Homeyba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 09:36 AM   #3
Barrettscv 
Have bike, will travel
 
Barrettscv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Edwardsville, Illinois
Bikes: Colnago Nuova Mexico, Eddy Merckx Corsa Extra, Pinarello Gavia, Schwinn Paramount, Motobecane Grand Record, Peugeot PX10, Serotta Nova X, Simoncini Cyclocross Special, Origin8 monstercross, Pedal Force CG2 and CX2
Posts: 10,491
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
Also take a look at Velocity A23 and HED Ardennes. The 23mm wide rim is light, strong & aero. I currently own the HED Ardennes, Velocity A23 and Mavic Open Pro and I rank these: first: HED Ardennes, Second: Velocity A23 and Third: Mavic Open Pro
__________________
When I ride my bike I feel free and happy and strong. I'm liberated from the usual nonsense of day to day life. Solid, dependable, silent, my bike is my horse, my fighter jet, my island, my friend. Together we will conquer that hill and thereafter the world.

Last edited by Barrettscv; 03-03-14 at 09:42 AM.
Barrettscv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 09:46 AM   #4
eithr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
eithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Columbus OH
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Trofeo, 2009 Cannondal Synapse
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I don't know much about the A23s, but see they are between the Deep Vs and Open Pros as far as weight and shape. The HED wheels are way out of my price range.
eithr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 09:47 AM   #5
Null66
Senior Member
 
Null66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Garner, NC 27529
Bikes: Built up DT, 2007 Fuji tourer (donor bike, RIP), 1995 1220 Trek
Posts: 2,103
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
NICE BIKE!

Drool! Drool! Drool!
Null66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 01:15 PM   #6
Bacciagalupe
Professional Fuss-Budget
 
Bacciagalupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 6,438
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eithr View Post
I ride with a buddy, who is pretty competitive. He rides an alloy Allez. It was serious work to keep up with him last year. This year I'm doing bike focused training and hoping to show up with a lighter bike build.
Just to be clear... The bike is a very small part of the equation, especially when it comes to double centuries. Using a lighter frame might save you literally 10 minutes out of a 15+ hour event. See http://www.bikequarterly.com/BQPBPEquipsurvey.pdf for more details.

Rotating weight does have a little more effect than frame weight. I wouldn't worry about it, though, unless you know the course is going to be very hilly.

If you want comfort, I recommend a 23mm wide rim. That will allow you to use 25c's at a slightly lower PSI, a setup that will not incur any performance penalties. I happen to like the H Plus Son TB14's; there are lots of options out there.

I'd also pay close attention to your fit. You may want something a little aggressive in order to improve your speed, but I for one find that sitting a little more upright is more comfortable after ~5 hours on the bike. YMMV.
Bacciagalupe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-14, 02:10 PM   #7
Weatherby
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Bikes: Too many
Posts: 548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Put fast, comfortable tires on the rig. One of the cheapests to improve speed and fun on a long ride. I am playing around with Schwalbe one 700x25 and Challenge Paris-Roubaix 700x27 on 32h/28h A23 rims and 28h/20h 25mm Flo-30 rims, respectively. They both are real comfy and roll good.

Unless you are superfit, rolling resistence and friction trumps aerodynamics (assuming you would be doing a 12-14 hour double)...use the best built wheels of the two.....if you are shooting for say 10 hours, forget what I said.
Weatherby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 08:27 AM   #8
chriskmurray
Senior Member
 
chriskmurray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Colorado Springs
Bikes: Borealis Echo, Ground Up Designs Ti Cross bike, Xtracycle, GT mod trials bike, pixie race machine
Posts: 1,121
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrettscv View Post
Also take a look at Velocity A23 and HED Ardennes. The 23mm wide rim is light, strong & aero. I currently own the HED Ardennes, Velocity A23 and Mavic Open Pro and I rank these: first: HED Ardennes, Second: Velocity A23 and Third: Mavic Open Pro
I will second this, the A23 is a fantastic rim, the slightly wider shape adds a bit of volume and really helps with comfort, which is pretty important over a double. They are pretty reasonably light as well given their strength.

I actually own two sets of A23's I like them so much.
chriskmurray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 10:30 AM   #9
eithr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
eithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Columbus OH
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Trofeo, 2009 Cannondal Synapse
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the thoughts on the A23s. My buddy had mentioned them before as well.

It's sounding like the Deep Vs are a no go... even though I love them aesthetically.

I know I can mess around, swapping smaller bits out, here and there, to improve fit, but I got some parts in the mail yesterday and started rough assembling the Cannondale. As current, this is looking a bit more aggressive than I was expecting. I might end up setting this aside for shorter competitions.

I am doing actual bike training this season. In the past that was enough to maintain a healthy back and forth competition with my buddy, despite the heavier bike and my typically outweighing him by 20-30 lbs. So, maybe I'll see better results on my Bianchi in the double century this year regardless?

We've talked about doing a 40 mile road race together. Maybe I'll reserve the Cannondale for that.
eithr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 11:44 AM   #10
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Posts: 11,230
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Deep-Vs are fine. It's just possible to do a little better. If you want to order built wheels, I think it's hard to beat a set of Soul 4.0 for the price. I build my own wheels. My latest is a Kinlin 279 (23mm) rim with CxRay spokes.

Aggressive is not a bad thing for a double century. You might like it better. Position and fit totally trump details like wheels.
Carbonfiberboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 11:47 AM   #11
unterhausen
Randomhead
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Bikes:
Posts: 14,590
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
if you get the deep v's go with the woodgrain
unterhausen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 12:32 PM   #12
lhbernhardt
Dharma Dog
 
lhbernhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Bikes: Rodriguez Shiftless street fixie with S&S couplers, Kuwahara tandem, Trek carbon, Dolan track
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by unterhausen View Post
if you get the deep v's go with the woodgrain
Yeah, they do look good until the "grain" on the brake track gets washed out, then they look like aluminum rims with wood grain painted on.

The A23's are a good choice. I used them for Furnace Creek/Trona 353 on the fixie with 23mm tires. (Aside: If you're riding fixed at FC, your rims can be no higher than 25mm, hence the low-profile rims. You do have to adjust the brakes outward a bit for the wider rim, but if the brakes are adjusted for Deep V's, merely opening the quick release will accommodate the A23's almost exactly! (If you're using Ergopower levers (with QR) with Campag calipers (with no QR), you're out of luck. I like to run a Campag lever with non-Campag caliper so I get two QR's.))

I like using a lower-profile rim; less weight to carry uphill, less susceptible to crosswinds. Although the Deep V is not a really high profile, not like the 44mm-and-up carbon
fiber rims you can get. Higher profile rims also tend to be much stronger, so you can use fewer spokes.

If you get the A23's, consider using the Velocity "Veloplugs" instead of rim tape. Because of the width of the rim, if you use tape that is the least bit narrow, you could develop punctures where there's a gap when the tape doesn't completely cover the hole (the holes are slightly staggered). Veloplugs are also supposed to be lighter than tape. You might hear stories that Veloplugs don't work with A23's. They do; I've got four wheels, inflated to 120 lbs, that work.

Luis
lhbernhardt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 02:23 PM   #13
seely 
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,087
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by lhbernhardt View Post

If you get the A23's, consider using the Velocity "Veloplugs" instead of rim tape. Because of the width of the rim, if you use tape that is the least bit narrow, you could develop punctures where there's a gap when the tape doesn't completely cover the hole (the holes are slightly staggered). Veloplugs are also supposed to be lighter than tape. You might hear stories that Veloplugs don't work with A23's. They do; I've got four wheels, inflated to 120 lbs, that work.

Luis
To clarify, we don't recommend using Veloplugs in our tubeless-ready A23 rims, which would be anything US-made onward. The deep, narrow trough of the tubeless-ready web doesn't allow the plug to satisfactorily seat, and will actually make the tires harder to mount vs. using two layers of our Velotape or equivalent. Therefore, we only recommend Velotape or an equivalent product (like Stan's).
__________________
commuter turned bike mechanic turned commuter (also a Velocity USA employee, but this is my personal account)
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 04:37 PM   #14
Wilfred Laurier
Seņor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 3,821
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe View Post
Just to be clear... The bike is a very small part of the equation...

...Rotating weight does have a little more effect than frame weight. I wouldn't worry about it, though, unless you know the course is going to be very hilly.
rotating weight only makes more difference than static weight when accelerating
added rotating weight when climbing has the same effect as static weight
Wilfred Laurier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 07:12 PM   #15
eithr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
eithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Columbus OH
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Trofeo, 2009 Cannondal Synapse
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier View Post
rotating weight only makes more difference than static weight when accelerating
added rotating weight when climbing has the same effect as static weight
Not sure I follow. Are you are saying that rotating weight (wheels) can have a negative effect on acceleration, but not on climbing?
eithr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 07:46 PM   #16
Steamer
Senior Member
 
Steamer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: high ground
Bikes:
Posts: 764
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eithr View Post
Not sure I follow. Are you are saying that rotating weight (wheels) can have a negative effect on acceleration, but not on climbing?
he's saying there is no difference in how added weight, static or rotating, affects you when climbing (steady state).
Steamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-14, 10:00 PM   #17
anyride
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Anchorage, AK
Bikes:
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bacciagalupe View Post
Just to be clear... The bike is a very small part of the equation, especially when it comes to double centuries. Using a lighter frame might save you literally 10 minutes out of a 15+ hour event. See http://www.bikequarterly.com/BQPBPEquipsurvey.pdf for more details.

Rotating weight does have a little more effect than frame weight. I wouldn't worry about it, though, unless you know the course is going to be very hilly.

If you want comfort, I recommend a 23mm wide rim. That will allow you to use 25c's at a slightly lower PSI, a setup that will not incur any performance penalties. I happen to like the H Plus Son TB14's; there are lots of options out there.

I'd also pay close attention to your fit. You may want something a little aggressive in order to improve your speed, but I for one find that sitting a little more upright is more comfortable after ~5 hours on the bike. YMMV.
Excellent link to the bike quarterly survey. I had not seen that before. Thanks for sharing!
c
anyride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-14, 09:29 AM   #18
Wilfred Laurier
Seņor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 3,821
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by eithr View Post
Not sure I follow. Are you are saying that rotating weight (wheels) can have a negative effect on acceleration, but not on climbing?
like steamer just said
a pound added to your wheels will slow you down while climbing
the same amount as a pound added to your frame
Wilfred Laurier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-14, 12:11 PM   #19
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Posts: 11,230
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Conventional wisdom has been that a pound on the wheels = 2 pounds on the frame. I've often wondered about that, because physics suggests this is not the case.

Wheels are different from a frame in that their energy is composed of both forward momentum and angular momentum. Thus a heavier wheelset will cause a bike to accelerate more slowly than the same additional weight on the frame.

Many people climb standing or with a strong downstroke instead of pedaling circles. In these cases, the bike is accelerated with every pedal stroke. Physics says that you get the energy spent performing this acceleration back during the deceleration phase. However, everyone knows that a lighter bike with lighter wheels feels easier on a climb, more so than losing the same weight off one's body. Hence the desire for lighter equipment.

My guess is that the higher momentary energy output required of the leg muscles to accelerate the heavier wheels is not returned completely during deceleration. IOW, the peaks and valleys of muscular output are more pronounced. That makes one tired.

New tandem captains who are experienced single riders can be blown away by this. One can produce the same power or ride at the same HR as normal, yet be more exhausted in one hour on a tandem than one was by 2 hours at the same apparent effort on one's single. I think it's because the heavier bike resists momentary accelerations and thus places higher momentary loads on the leg muscles. A new captain eventually adapts to this and learns to pedal and apply power more smoothly, but the adaptation can take a long time.
Carbonfiberboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-14, 12:31 PM   #20
Wilfred Laurier
Seņor Member
 
Wilfred Laurier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Bikes:
Posts: 3,821
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 98 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy View Post
Conventional wisdom has been that a pound on the wheels = 2 pounds on the frame. I've often wondered about that, because physics suggests this is not the case.

Wheels are different from a frame in that their energy is composed of both forward momentum and angular momentum. Thus a heavier wheelset will cause a bike to accelerate more slowly than the same additional weight on the frame.

Many people climb standing or with a strong downstroke instead of pedaling circles. In these cases, the bike is accelerated with every pedal stroke. Physics says that you get the energy spent performing this acceleration back during the deceleration phase. However, everyone knows that a lighter bike with lighter wheels feels easier on a climb, more so than losing the same weight off one's body. Hence the desire for lighter equipment.

My guess is that the higher momentary energy output required of the leg muscles to accelerate the heavier wheels is not returned completely during deceleration. IOW, the peaks and valleys of muscular output are more pronounced. That makes one tired.

New tandem captains who are experienced single riders can be blown away by this. One can produce the same power or ride at the same HR as normal, yet be more exhausted in one hour on a tandem than one was by 2 hours at the same apparent effort on one's single. I think it's because the heavier bike resists momentary accelerations and thus places higher momentary loads on the leg muscles. A new captain eventually adapts to this and learns to pedal and apply power more smoothly, but the adaptation can take a long time.
when a heavy wheel is being ridden at a non steady state
like when standing to climb
the amount of extra exhertion required due to increased angular momentum
is minimal
most likely imperceptible

the only reason i can think of for a delta between the heavier wheel requiring more energy to accelerate
than the amount lost in deceleration
would be the fact that the drivetrain responsible for transfering leg energy into rotational energu
is not 100% efficient

otherwise
the extra energy required compared to a lighter wheel
is exactly equal to the difference in deceleration between the light and heavy wheel
Wilfred Laurier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-14, 02:00 PM   #21
Carbonfiberboy 
just another gosling
 
Carbonfiberboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Everett, WA
Bikes: CoMo Speedster 2003, Trek 5200, CAAD 9, Fred 2004
Posts: 11,230
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 90 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilfred Laurier View Post
when a heavy wheel is being ridden at a non steady state
like when standing to climb
the amount of extra exhertion required due to increased angular momentum
is minimal
most likely imperceptible

the only reason i can think of for a delta between the heavier wheel requiring more energy to accelerate
than the amount lost in deceleration
would be the fact that the drivetrain responsible for transfering leg energy into rotational energu
is not 100% efficient

otherwise
the extra energy required compared to a lighter wheel
is exactly equal to the difference in deceleration between the light and heavy wheel
To do a reductio, one could hop up stairs, alternating legs, and taking exactly the same time as required to climb the stairs smoothly. Total energy required is the same, yet by hopping one reaches the top of the stairs much more tired, because one's peak output was higher. When it comes to muscular output, "energy" is not the same as classical physics implies, due to the cost of its production.

Racers, and not only sprinters, have always paid a lot of money for lighter wheels, even though UCI limits total bike weight. It's possible they know something.

In real life, the fact that the difference in difficulty of acceleration may be imperceptible, doesn't mean it doesn't exist, or have an effect over 20,000' of climbing on a brevet.

OTOH, I have always gone for aero over light weight, finding that makes a larger difference. Helium wheels were popular for a while, but one doesn't see them any more, now that light aero wheels exist. It's sort of a similar situation with aero wheels. Not a lot of difference in watts absorbed at brevet speeds, but there is some, and it adds up. First brevet finishers are usually on a light bike with light, aero wheels.
Carbonfiberboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-05-14, 05:17 PM   #22
MetinUz 
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 909
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Carbonfiberboy View Post
First brevet finishers are usually on a light bike with light, aero wheels.
True, but the same guys would probably still finish first on a heavier bike, just a minute or two slower. I still remember last year's Devil Mountain Double, one of the hardest double centuries with almost 20,000ft of climbing. The lead group which started an hour after me passed me 5 hours into my ride, mostly racers on light carbon bikes. Another hour and half later, I was passed by a rider on a Rivendell Rambouillet with a rear rack. He would go on to catch the lead pack and finish in the top ten.
MetinUz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-14, 05:21 PM   #23
lhbernhardt
Dharma Dog
 
lhbernhardt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Bikes: Rodriguez Shiftless street fixie with S&S couplers, Kuwahara tandem, Trek carbon, Dolan track
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely View Post
To clarify, we don't recommend using Veloplugs in our tubeless-ready A23 rims, which would be anything US-made onward. The deep, narrow trough of the tubeless-ready web doesn't allow the plug to satisfactorily seat, and will actually make the tires harder to mount vs. using two layers of our Velotape or equivalent. Therefore, we only recommend Velotape or an equivalent product (like Stan's).
Not sure, but I think I have the US-made A23's. But the Veloplugs still work; haven't had any internal punctures, and the wheels were used in London-Edinburgh-London and at Furnace Creek, and the only tire problems I had were with the Vittoria tire I mention below:

BTW, I forgot to mention that the A23's (and probably other 23mm rims) will only work with certain 23mm tires (I would imagine they would work with any 25mm and larger tires). I found out the hard way that a Vittoria Corsa EVO CX will blow off an A23 rim at 120 lbs. But you can put a good 130 lbs into a 23mm Vredestein Fortezza TriComp on an A23 with no problem.

(At 175 lbs, I tend to disagree with those who advise using lower pressures in their tires. If I put anything less than 120 lbs into my tires, I will pinch flat. I also believe in putting 120 lbs into both front and rear - none of this "90 lbs front, 110 pounds rear" nonsense. Yes, weight distribution is 40/60 when you're in the saddle, but get out of the saddle and now it's just the opposite. And you want a softer tire on the front when you're climbing out of the saddle?)

Luis
lhbernhardt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-14, 07:14 AM   #24
eithr
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
eithr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Columbus OH
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Trofeo, 2009 Cannondal Synapse
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Excited to share - I nabbed a set of barely used 3T Accelero 40 Pros. At 37mm they are deeper than my Velocity Deep Vs (30mm), but somehow much much lighter. In fact, these seem to be lighter than all the other options I was considering, including the Open Pros. They are good looking wheels... just waiting for them to arrive to start piecing this bike together.
eithr is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.