Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Have bike, will travel Barrettscv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Windy City
    My Bikes
    A road bike for every purpose
    Posts
    8,818
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Long distance cycling, in February, in Alaska, on a fat bike......

    2014 Trek DS.1: "Viaggiatore" A do-it-all bike that is waiting in Italy
    2012 Pedal Force CG2: "Secolo Bicicletta" the modern carbon fiber road bike
    2012 Pedal Force CX2: "Carbone CX" the carbon fiber CX bike
    2010 Origin 8 CX 700: "Servizio Grave" Monstercross/29er bike
    1997 Simoncini Special Cyclocross: "Little Simon" lugged Columbus steel CX bike
    1987 Serotta Nova Special X: "Azzurri" The retro Columbus SPX steel road bike

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Actually there are several long distance races. This one had two distances, 350 and 1000 miles. Others are for varying distances and include mixed transportation modes.

    Imagine: Riding 1000 miles in 10 days, by your self! No massages, nobody to fix things, no one to cook your meals, no nothing! And doing it on tundra and wilderness trails. All in all makes the typical bike race, including all the European thingies seem pretty wussy.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    1,893
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm curious. In these conditions, would fatbiking be faster or slower than XC skiing?

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This has been an unusual year with little snow over large portions of the route. So, other things being equal, the bike wins. Even in fairly deep snow pushing a bike with gear on it may work better than pulling a sled behind skis.

    On the other hand for the races where there are no trails it seems skiers do pretty well. Over those very much shorter races, in the area of 150 miles, route and pace choice seem to be as important as anything else.

  5. #5
    Senior Member MinnMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Minneapolis
    My Bikes
    2011 Felt F3 Ltd, 2010 Trek 2.1, 2009 KHS Flite 220, 1991 Bianchi Osprey
    Posts
    1,591
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wonder what Scott vs. Amundsen would have been like if one of the teams had fat bikes? Probably Amundsen's dogs+skis would still prevail, but it makes for interesting speculation. (Of course, if we allow any anachronism, they could have had snowmobiles or snow cats, but then that would have been Hillary's thing...)

    To my knowledge, fat bikes have yet to make it to Antarctica, but it's probably only a matter of time.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    1,893
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MinnMan View Post
    I wonder what Scott vs. Amundsen would have been like if one of the teams had fat bikes? Probably Amundsen's dogs+skis would still prevail, but it makes for interesting speculation. (Of course, if we allow any anachronism, they could have had snowmobiles or snow cats, but then that would have been Hillary's thing...)

    To my knowledge, fat bikes have yet to make it to Antarctica, but it's probably only a matter of time.
    In a setup like that, every little advantage and every little screwup are amplified, potentially with devastating results. (Scott actually had motorized sledges, but they failed before the main expedition even took off.) If your trip is going to take a few months round trip, you need to bring supplies for all this time, and you need to carry them by yourself. And if you need to carry craploads of stuff, you have to go slow, which means that you have to carry even more stuff, etc. Amundsen took almost 60 days to go 800 miles from the coast to the North Pole. Scott took 80 days. For both, it was considered to be a good result to travel 20 miles in one day. There was a number of minor screwups on Scott's side and the end result was that Scott was significantly slower even during the first half of the journey south, when his team was also on dog sleds.

    Fatbiking probably isn't much faster or more efficient than simply walking if you need to pull a 100+ lb sled loaded with meat and cans of kerosene. If you're going for speed, you need to travel light. And if you travel light, you can't travel long. It might have been optimal for Scott to do what he did part of the way to the pole, then do a ski/bike dash to the pole and back, with the ski/bike portion at most 10 days long. The guy from the original post did 1000 miles in 10 days. Antarctica is much colder than Alaska, Iditarod Trail is mostly under 3000' and South Pole Plateau is ~10,000' ... let's call it 700 miles. Could have been enough to beat Amundsen.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Although Jeff did the trip on a bike, those kinds of trips are fairly common. Not everyday, just common. People walk the Pipeline from the North Slope to Valdez, about 800 miles. People annually do a 150 mile no trial run. They ride the 350 miles between Fairbanks and Anchorage. On so on.

    One of my friends had an annual trip he took from the North Slope, Barrow area, across the north to the east Coast of Canada. He did that with a buddy and a couple snowmachines.

    In all these trips a key element is Logistics. In fact, I'd say THE three key elements are personal character, logistics and luck. Character to keep going when you are cold, wet, tired, hungry and there is no one around for many miles. Logistics to try to make sure the supplies you need are where you need them when you need them. Typically, they are mailed ahead to village post offices or flown in to resupply points. Luck that you aren't injured beyond your capability to treat and that you don't become ill.

    One of my friends said it best one day: "What we do just for the hell of it is a once in a lifetime adventure for most down in the States".

    Do some research, find a wilderness event you'd like to test yourself with. Forget the artificial, often pretty wussy, things down in civilization and take it on. You will never, never regret it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •