Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 56 of 56
  1. #51
    Senior Member Jim Kukula's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    New York State
    My Bikes
    Thorn Nomad Mk2, 1996 Trek 520, Workcycles Transport, Brompton
    Posts
    464
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Kukula View Post
    the big hill today was about 14%.
    Here is a fun way to look at the climbing on a route. I download the data from mapmyride and then in excel I compute the distance and grade for each little segment and then sort those pairs of values and make a scatter plot. Anyway you can see from this that about 1 km of this ride was above 9% grade - and half of that was above 12%.

    Here was a brutal ride from a couple years ago, 70 miles with maybe 5 miles above 10%:
    Last edited by Jim Kukula; 06-16-14 at 07:25 PM. Reason: add another ride for comparison

  2. #52
    Senior Member Null66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Garner, NC 27529
    My Bikes
    Built up DT, 2007 Fuji tourer (donor bike, RIP), 1995 1220 Trek
    Posts
    1,322
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hey,

    I "did" my first 200k this spring, and on a DT too, loaded, over loaded per people who know better and for what I actually used and for contingencies that did not happen... "Did" meaning made the mileage, but not the time. Took a few weeks of mostly indoor riding to get ready to to get ready. Here's a log of people trying to help.

    Clydesdale going to do first 200k this April.

    You too can "do" 200k this year, making the timings another matter, but even if it takes you all weekend you still DID IT! Regardless, if you make the time or not, even just the structure trying to get ready for it will vastly improve your riding and health...

    First numb feet:
    can be bad shoes, or trying to mash... feet can only take so much pressure so many times... What's your cadence?

    Learn to drink and eat on the go...

    Learn how you respond to various distances...

  3. #53
    Senior Member Steamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    high ground
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamster View Post
    It's not hard to demonstrate that it isn't.

    Let's use a calculator at Bicycle Speed (Velocity) And Power Calculator and plug in some numbers. For simplicity, assume that we have a trip that consists of 1 mile uphill at 4%, 1 mile downhill at 4% and 1 mile flat. Pick "racing bicycle - hands on the tops", plug in bike weight 20 lbs, rider weight 160 lbs, power 145 W (2 W/kg - very conservative for a male rider getting back into shape), leave all else at default values.
    Hmmm.

    My own personal power data from a couple 200Ks, a 12 hr race, and a bazzillion training rides suggests that my ultramarathon limit is at around 60% of FTP. And that's if I am highly motivated. More realistically, it's closer to 50%. That ultramarathon limit is reached somewhere around 6 to 8 hours, or longer.

    For a 160 lb rider, who is essentially new to the sport, to have an FTP of 280W is pretty unrealistic.

  4. #54
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    2,023
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Steamer View Post
    Hmmm.

    My own personal power data from a couple 200Ks, a 12 hr race, and a bazzillion training rides suggests that my ultramarathon limit is at around 60% of FTP. And that's if I am highly motivated. More realistically, it's closer to 50%. That ultramarathon limit is reached somewhere around 6 to 8 hours, or longer.

    For a 160 lb rider, who is essentially new to the sport, to have an FTP of 280W is pretty unrealistic.
    Re-read the starting post in the thread. The person is complaining about being unable to go faster than 10.1 mph even during 2-3 hour rides. My power data has me at 87% FTP for 1h50 and 71% FTP for 3 hours (and I can probably do better than the second number).

    Further, the calculation assumes that he's pedaling all the way downhill at constant power. Let's make the model more realistic. Suppose that he goes up hills at 145 W, on flats at 100 W, and coasts downhills after getting up to terminal velocity. That only drops his average speed to 12.7 while dropping his average power to 104 W.

    Finally note that my route profile has 70 ft/mile of climbing, which would be pretty hilly even by upstate NY standards.

  5. #55
    Senior Member Steamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    high ground
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by hamster View Post
    Re-read the starting post in the thread. The person is complaining about being unable to go faster than 10.1 mph even during 2-3 hour rides. My power data has me at 87% FTP for 1h50 and 71% FTP for 3 hours (and I can probably do better than the second number).

    Further, the calculation assumes that he's pedaling all the way downhill at constant power. Let's make the model more realistic. Suppose that he goes up hills at 145 W, on flats at 100 W, and coasts downhills after getting up to terminal velocity. That only drops his average speed to 12.7 while dropping his average power to 104 W.

    Finally note that my route profile has 70 ft/mile of climbing, which would be pretty hilly even by upstate NY standards.
    Consider how flat the CP curve is in the region beyond hours. That only distorts things by a small amount, perhaps 10%. At least that's what my data shows, anyways. It's possible your FTP could be underestimated. That's not a rare problem.

    I mentioned the ultramarathon limit mostly because that's the number I have been most interested in, and have the best handle on, and would be the limit of interest to a person completing a 200K, as was referenced by the OP as being his goal.

    Aside from that, do you know the CdA and Crr used in that calculator? As you alluded to, therein may lie at least part of the OP's speed problem.

    The rest of the discrepancy between your calculation and the OP's report speeds probably lies in his weight (bike plus rider plus crapola/baggage).
    Last edited by Steamer; 06-28-14 at 12:31 PM.

  6. #56
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Escondido, CA
    Posts
    2,023
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Steamer View Post
    Consider how flat the CP curve is in the region beyond hours. That only distorts things by a small amount, perhaps 10%. At least that's what my data shows, anyways. It's possible your FTP could be underestimated. That's not a rare problem.

    I mentioned the ultramarathon limit mostly because that's the number I have been most interested in, and have the best handle on, and would be the limit of interest to a person completing a 200K, as was referenced by the OP as being his goal.

    Aside from that, do you know the CdA and Crr used in that calculator? As you alluded to, therein may lie at least part of the OP's speed problem.

    The rest of the discrepancy between your calculation and the OP's report speeds probably lies in his weight (bike plus rider plus crapola/baggage).

    If anything, my FTP is overestimated. Here are the numbers from 2013: 216 W @ 0:30, 201 W @ 1:00, 193 W @ 1:50 (4300' hill climb), 158 W @ 3:00, 154 W @ 4:00 (6000' hill climb), estimated FTP 220 W.

    My last two ultras were a double century with 52'/mile of climbing at average speed 14.4 mph, average moving speed 15.5 mph and average power 115 W, and ... let's call it a 200k (unsupported) with 69'/mile of climbing, with average speed 12.7 mph, average moving speed 14.2 mph and average power 110 W.

    CdA and Crr used by the calculator are displayed at the bottom. At our settings, it was using CdA 5.26 ft2 and Crr 0.0033. And yes, that's precisely my point.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •