Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Bike Racing Discuss pro racing, the big races, and even the small backyard races. Don't forget to update all the members with your own race results.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-15-06, 09:53 AM   #1
ben1973
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
xc racing on a santa cruz blur

hi
is a santa cruz blur a good choice bike for xc racing
my objective in buying the bike is speed over comfort within reason
the kind of racing i want to do is shorter track 2 hours ish up to 100k events in aus
ive compared the blur to the superlight, and the superlight does seem a little quicker under pedalling and may have ben down to rar shock pressure however this has been a road test only. i looked at a second hand superlight from 2001 and detected a crack in the rear swingarm which is a little offputting.
im fairly open on bike choice and am considering an ellsworth truth and a yeti asr as well
any advice appreciatedthanks
ben1973 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 10:11 AM   #2
veteran_youth
VELOTAKU
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 106
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I did a few races on a Classic Blur in 05.........notes:
The sizing, even on a large (I am 5'11) feels a little short in the top tube with a 100mm stem and layback post.
Pedal bob is minimal
Suspension is awesome....slam in/over/through pretty much anything
Actual Weight: 6.5 lbs ano frame w/RP3

Now....the classic Blurs are no longer produced (you could probably find one new if you tried), so you would be looking at a Blur XC. Medium Ano frame actual weight 5.5 lbs, and a longer TT length as well. I can only assume this would be a great race bike. My Blur took me to the podium in sport class and was capable in expert, if heavy (about 28 lbs fully built w/full xt including 765 tubeless wheels).

That being said, if I was buying a pure FS race bike right now, there is no better value than the Giant Anthem 1. The Anthem 2 is also nice. Took a demo on a short road ride and it just felt fast.

Andrew
veteran_youth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-06, 02:16 PM   #3
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Bikes: GMC Denali
Posts: 17,588
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have never raced on a blur but I did race a Superlight for 2 1/2 years. That bike was awesome. I never had a problem with it and it is very rare to ever hear of anyone breaking one (when riding it as intended). I was not a big fan of the Blur's but I didn't spend a lot of time on them. I was really turned off by their weight. Now that the Blur XC's are being made I would imagine that they would be a great bike.

That being said I absolutely love my Truth. It will be hard for me to part with this one, there really aren't any other bikes out there that I would want to switch to after being on the Truth for a while. The only bikes I would consider would be a Racer X or possibly a Turner Nitrous. However I would be afraid to use the Nitrous as a trail bike or for endurance racing. It just looks a little too fragile. The Truth makes an awesome cross country racer but it is also one of the most common frames for endurance racing. On top of that it makes a great all purpose bike as well.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:10 PM.