Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    GT frame questions

    First of all, how do Aggressor and Avalanche frames defer? To me they look the same.

    Secondly, I think my new avalanche frame is too small for me, so I am planning to exchange it with a bigger one. So will the price of the frame increase or will it remain the same despite a change in size?

    Thirdly, say I need a 17" frame but GT measures their frames by S, M, L, XL..... So what size is 17"?

    Thank you for your attention

  2. #2
    Canadian eh?
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    2012 Trek Madone 5.2
    Posts
    1,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    M is 17"

    well it usually is
    i know a specialized M is 17" and large is 19.5 or sumtin"

  3. #3
    Donating member Richard D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Faversham, Kent, UK
    Posts
    1,852
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by WorldIRC
    M is 17"

    well it usually is
    i know a specialized M is 17" and large is 19.5 or sumtin"
    My Giant is a Medium and that's a 19" frame ...
    Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)

  4. #4
    Canadian eh?
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    2012 Trek Madone 5.2
    Posts
    1,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yah but giant is also a respectable company who designs there own frames unlike GT who is now "outta business" and buys there frames from taiwan cuz they are to ignorant to design themselves lol.
    just my 2cents

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I called the shop I bought my bike from and they refused to change the frame for me

    What can I do now?

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Come on, anyone knows about the price?

  7. #7
    Canadian eh?
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Toronto
    My Bikes
    2012 Trek Madone 5.2
    Posts
    1,730
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    prolly around 250-400CDN so i guess 150-250 US anymore and its a unneeded markup. gt is bust now and bot by pacific so i dunno what urr warranty will be tho ur better buying another frame from a company thats in business

  8. #8
    Gravity Is Yer Friend dirtbikedude's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    "Over the Hill" and going down fast in the 805.
    My Bikes
    Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Kona Bear, Bianchi 928 Carbon/Chorus, C'Dale Rize4
    Posts
    2,961
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Your dealer should be able to tell you if there is a price diff, usually not. The differance between the two frames would probably be head angle, top tube length, seat angle and wheel base. Alot of frames look alike but those dimensions could differ just a bit which would make the bikes ride differently.

  9. #9
    WallaWalla! Rotifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Walla Walla, WA
    Posts
    823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I suspect that, considering the price level, the frames are the same. However, as the previous post mentioned, GT is bankrupt. Dealers are eager to be rid of their frames as they are no longer backed up by a big company. Unless you are working with a nice bike shop ... good luck. I think the individual in the aforementioned post has his companies confused. GT was very well respected, designed their own frames and manufactured many of them in the United States. Giant is gaining respect because they offer great value, but their bikes are made overseas with the sloppy welds and glaring paint jobs one would expect.
    Jeff

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Posts
    53
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Fallow up GT question. I have an I-Drive and give the GT bankrupt thing, was thinking of get a few spare parts, I love the frame and the I-Drive system. Rides better uphill then my brother Mt Cycle. No bob at all in the back. So if something goes, say the barring in the I-Drive I want to replace just that part rather then the frame. Anyone know of a source for parts.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    So I will be wasting money if I change to a frame of another company as no one would buy GT's products now anyway right?

  12. #12
    Donating member Richard D's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2001
    Location
    Faversham, Kent, UK
    Posts
    1,852
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by WorldIRC
    yah but giant is also a respectable company who designs there own frames unlike GT who is now "outta business" and buys there frames from taiwan cuz they are to ignorant to design themselves lol.
    just my 2cents
    Originally posted by Rotifer
    GT was very well respected, designed their own frames and manufactured many of them in the United States. Giant is gaining respect because they offer great value, but their bikes are made overseas with the sloppy welds and glaring paint jobs one would expect.
    Most of the low-mid priced GT frames were made in Taiwan, along with most low-mid priced Treks, Specialized etc. Welding on Giants is as good as on most MTB's (they supply many of the frames to the other companies anyway). I don't think you'll find many frames from any of the bigger names with sloppy welding. As to paint jobs that's a matter of personal taste, but the I don't think how tasteful it is depends on the country of manufacture as to the companies marketing people.
    Last edited by Richard D; 06-13-02 at 02:20 AM.
    Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am in Taiwan for holidays and will be going back to US once the semester starts. So what do you guys suggest?

    Should I buy another frame from another brand and sell my current frame when I return to US or should I just stick to this frame, or otherwise?

    I have only ride with this frame for less than 2 km so far and if I decide to change it I have to do it soon or else I can't ride my bike.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    and anyone knows what's the diff between Agressor and Avalanche in terms of frame?

  15. #15
    WallaWalla! Rotifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Walla Walla, WA
    Posts
    823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry, I like Giant ... a friend recently bought one on my recomendation.. the welds did disapoint me but hey, what a value. I have a Rocky Mountain, it's stupid to compare the welds on a $2, 000 bike with a $500 bike. Anyway, I tried to dig up information on the Avalanche and Aggressor.

    Aggressor: 7005 aluminium frame features GT Triple Triangle design with protapered downtube and replaceable rear derailleur hanger.

    Avalanche: 7000 series aluminum, formed and tapered top tube, oversized bi-ovalized gusseted down tube, box chainstays, oversized constant radius seatstays
    Jeff

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    270
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by Rotifer
    Sorry, I like Giant ... a friend recently bought one on my recomendation.. the welds did disapoint me but hey, what a value. I have a Rocky Mountain, it's stupid to compare the welds on a $2, 000 bike with a $500 bike. Anyway, I tried to dig up information on the Avalanche and Aggressor.

    Aggressor: 7005 aluminium frame features GT Triple Triangle design with protapered downtube and replaceable rear derailleur hanger.

    Avalanche: 7000 series aluminum, formed and tapered top tube, oversized bi-ovalized gusseted down tube, box chainstays, oversized constant radius seatstays
    I used to own a Giant too, nothing wrong with the welding except for being exposed too much unlike other neater brands.

    So what do these info mean? I am not too expert in bike technology. can someone explain what these details mean?

    Right now I can only judge based on the prices. Aggressor has a lower combo of parts as compared to Avalanche, so does this mean that avalanche is a better frame? Better in terms of what?

  17. #17
    WallaWalla! Rotifer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    Walla Walla, WA
    Posts
    823
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Avalanche frame is "worked" a bit more to provide different ride qualities. If you have the money, you may as well go with it.
    Jeff

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •