Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Mountain Biking
Reload this Page >

What should I do?

Notices
Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

What should I do?

Old 11-22-15, 04:12 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What should I do?

I brought a giant talon 29er 1 (https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-gb...1/19251/77364/) two weeks ago, but am not sure whether i should return it and get a 27.5 mtb form giant instead. The reason for my question is that many other forums on the internet say 29ers are only good for XC and are hard to corner on stuff like trails, whereas 27.5 are alot better in general. What should I do 1-return the 29er for a 27.5 or 2-keep the 29er and just use it.
hardmaniron is offline  
Old 11-22-15, 04:46 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Ride your bike.
FrozenK is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 03:43 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 5,773
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 453 Post(s)
Liked 104 Times in 87 Posts
If you can't ride the 29er on a trail, you won't be any better on a 27.5

You've got a real nice bike with the Talon; if go with the 27.5 size being better than 29er; that wheel size is just as obsolete as 29er's are; 27.5+ is where it's at for 2016 - as #FrozenK says - Ride your bike
jimc101 is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 03:48 PM
  #4  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks guys I should just man up and ride my bike I guess.
hardmaniron is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 06:24 PM
  #5  
Old Fart In Training
 
osco53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
It ain't the bike It's the engine

Think of wheel size as a fit thing first, I'm 5' 11" with a 32" Inseam and I do better on a 27.5"
I had a 29er and it was great but the smaller, lighter wheels of the 27.5 Is what helped me the most.

Your ultimate solution, Is N+1,

N= the number of bikes you currently own .
As for the +1, use caution,,, I am at 3, If I go for the +1 my wife may make me sleep In the Garage

Last edited by osco53; 11-24-15 at 06:28 PM.
osco53 is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 08:20 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Pompiere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 3,425

Bikes: 1984 Miyata 310, 1986 Schwinn Sierra, 2011 Jamis Quest, 1980 Peugeot TH8 Tandem, 1992 Performance Parabola, 1987 Ross Mt. Hood, 1988 Schwinn LeTour, 1988 Trek 400T, 1981 Fuji S12-S LTD, 197? FW Evans

Mentioned: 24 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 521 Post(s)
Liked 943 Times in 495 Posts
Originally Posted by osco53
It ain't the bike It's the engine

Think of wheel size as a fit thing first, I'm 5' 11" with a 32" Inseam and I do better on a 27.5"
I had a 29er and it was great but the smaller, lighter wheels of the 27.5 Is what helped me the most.

Your ultimate solution, Is N+1,

N= the number of bikes you currently own .
As for the +1, use caution,,, I am at 3, If I go for the +1 my wife may make me sleep In the Garage
To be more specific: make sure N+1<S-1, where S is the number of bikes that causes significant other to take action to rearrange your living arrangement.
Pompiere is offline  
Old 11-24-15, 08:39 PM
  #7  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
For people that aren't used to 29" it takes a bit of perseverance. If you just commute and do a couple of trails a week
29" maybe the way to go. If your a all mountain guy maybe a 27.5" would be more appropriate.
Fringale is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 12:30 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
catgita's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 765

Bikes: Fitz randonneuse, Trek Superfly/AL, Tsunami SS, Bacchetta, HPV Speed Machine, Rans Screamer

Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 100 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Let us wax nostalgic about the road not taken.

Naaaa... Screw that. Love the one you'r with! No regrets. Don't pick fly poop out of pepper. Find out what those big hoops can really do.
catgita is offline  
Old 11-25-15, 11:01 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Fringale
For people that aren't used to 29" it takes a bit of perseverance. If you just commute and do a couple of trails a week
29" maybe the way to go. If your a all mountain guy maybe a 27.5" would be more appropriate.
No, this is dumb. 29rs are fine and have some advantages unless a) you need a really small frame or b) you need long travel out your rear suspension (6 inches or more)
But for the vast majority of people 29rs work great for all kinds of trails. Anybody who says that 29rs are for commuters and casual trail riders doesn't really know what they are talking about.
FrozenK is offline  
Old 11-26-15, 12:58 PM
  #10  
Old Fart In Training
 
osco53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 22 Times in 16 Posts
Modern 29er's are better than 29er's of a few years back, they have learned how to shorten the chain stays to make them more 'Playful' maneuverable in tight corners, leanerd what Geo works best for this or that kind of riding.

Take two equal bikes, same company same model like the Trek remedy in 27.5 and 29".. They will have slightly different geometry and handle completely different.
Now look at the wheels, both are the same make but the 29er will be heavier because its bigger,, and if its not built better it will flex more.
Forget the tire , this balances out pretty close as the 29er tire can have less aggressive treads because of a larger contact patch, and are often only 100 grams or so heavier for a given model of both sizes...

It's the bike's geo and wheel set that counts,, a real rough example,,
Two wheel sets one 29er and one 27.5 both costing $600, the 29er set will weigh more and most likely flex more.

Now,, Two sets,,the 27.5 is that $600 set,, compared now to a $900 29er wheel set....

I bet you just canceled out the weight and the flex Issue..

As for the 27.5 accelerating faster,,well that's a roll out thing,, google that one.



Howz zat for some pretty guuud Bhulll Hockey


FYI,,after three seasons on my hard tail 29er I moved to a 27.5 full squish,,, On my very first ride out on the new and very unfamiliar bike I set personal records on EVERY section on EVERY single track trail I regularly ride,,PER STRAVA..

On my 15 mile loop

Why ? Simply because I did not have the 'Engines' to spin up the big hoops as well..

This would most likely be reversed If I only rode open flowy or X country type trails but my trails run from mild open to tight and twisty with all kinds of steep punchy climbs..

If Its your first bike, buy the one that looks cool and ride it to death, then buy the bike that helps you where YOU need it the most.....

Last edited by osco53; 11-26-15 at 01:07 PM.
osco53 is offline  
Old 11-26-15, 01:31 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,036
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 175 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
You need to stop reading and ride. Seriously. The difference in weight of a 650b Stans Arch EX wheelset and a 29r Stans Arch EX wheelset is exactly 100 grams which, according to you is insignificant. And if either of them is flexy to you, you need to lose weight. And a 29r will not have a larger contact patch. The size (square inches) is determined by the pressure you run and how much you weigh. The shape is different on the larger wheel, but they are the same size.

As for harder to accelerate, it isn't about rollout is about having more mass further away from the center. It's physics. Look it up in a book. Now, the larger wheels will also carry more momentum and roll over roots better. Again, physics.

I've been riding 29rs for almost ten years now. From tight and twisty with punchy climbs to rough descents. On rooty trails 29rs make a big difference, if the trails are rocky (square edged rocks) the difference is less noticeable. And the more suspension travel you add the less the wheel size makes a difference. But for a hardtail? There is a reason 29rs took over that market as soon as there was a decent fork available (I. E. When Rock Shox started making the Reba 29)
FrozenK is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Miguel Neves
Hybrid Bicycles
4
11-29-15 12:03 PM
Woddy81
Mountain Biking
11
09-11-13 08:30 PM
roccobike
Mountain Biking
23
04-13-13 02:47 PM
rob18
Mountain Biking
4
07-19-10 06:31 AM
lamboluver
Mountain Biking
3
06-11-10 06:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.