Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-05, 09:34 AM   #1
dvdauthority
The Cannondale Kid
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Bikes: Cannondale Prophet 2000
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Upgrade Fever - I've caught it...

Ok, this is my first post here - so be gentle!

I just bought a bike and am actually waiting for it to be delivered. One of the things that I love about biking is you can upgrade parts, etc. But (yes, there's a "BUT") I'm not sure what's good and what isn't. Here is a link to my bike and the parts it has on it, so I'm wondering what - if anything - needs to be upgraded? Is a SRAM cassette better or worse than a Shimano?

Like I said I'm new here and to the sport, so any helpful advice would be appreciated...

Check out my bike here

Thanks in advance!
dvdauthority is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 09:53 AM   #2
alcahueteria
Senior Member
 
alcahueteria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Bikes: Specialized AWOL, Soma Juice
Posts: 1,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
hot damn, that's a nice bike. I wouldn't worry about upgrading cassettes, you can do that when they wear out. (well I guess you can upgrade anything when it wears out, but whatever).

Yeah, so you bought the wrong bike if you want to upgrade. That's a sweet bike as is. It's xt and lx, and the only thing better in shimano is xtr. If I were to upgrade one thing without trying it, I would probably do the brakes because I have only heard bad things about htem.
alcahueteria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 09:58 AM   #3
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Bikes: GMC Denali
Posts: 17,588
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Unfortunately my work blocks your website, probably since dvd's are usually considered work related. Anyway, what bike is it?
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 10:05 AM   #4
alcahueteria
Senior Member
 
alcahueteria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Bikes: Specialized AWOL, Soma Juice
Posts: 1,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
'04 jekyll 800, xt everything with an lx FD. Lefty front, fox float rl rear.
alcahueteria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 10:06 AM   #5
dvdauthority
The Cannondale Kid
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Bikes: Cannondale Prophet 2000
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hey, thanks. I meant to ask about the brakes as well. I didn't know if Hayes were the best or to go with Shimano XT - but since I haven't received the bike yet, I'll try it first. The person I bought it from spared no expense in upgrading the parts - so I'm assuming that these Hayes brakes are going to be top notch...
dvdauthority is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 10:10 AM   #6
superdex
staring at the mountains
 
superdex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Parker, CO
Bikes: 1x9 mtb commuter, Javelin Boca
Posts: 3,735
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
the only thing I could see upgrading (not really "upgrading" -- changing is more like it) would be the saddle and tires to suit your preferences. Other than that, it's a schweeet ride as it is, you'll be puhlenty happy
superdex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 10:11 AM   #7
alcahueteria
Senior Member
 
alcahueteria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Bikes: Specialized AWOL, Soma Juice
Posts: 1,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
yeah, since it's used, I'd imagine that if the brakes had problems the guy before you probably dealt with the problems.
alcahueteria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 10:12 AM   #8
dvdauthority
The Cannondale Kid
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Bikes: Cannondale Prophet 2000
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Also, If I were to upgrade my front derailleur - what type would I need to get. 9 speed, obviously, but are they all pretty much the same or would it be a waste of money?
dvdauthority is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 10:19 AM   #9
LowCel 
Throw the stick!!!!
 
LowCel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Charleston, WV
Bikes: GMC Denali
Posts: 17,588
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It would pretty much be a waste of money. Before you upgrade you need to know if it is a top or bottom pull, top or bottom swing and what diameter the seat tube is.

I wouldn't bother with the upgrade until it is worn out though, most likely you won't notice any difference at all.
__________________
I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.
LowCel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 10:39 AM   #10
Daoooo
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
the brake sucks. piece of #$(*&( the screw on the brake lever will keep backing out, unless you put thread lock on it. rotor is very fragile, bent easily. hard to position the pads correctly.
however, it does provide nice braking power.

nice bike overall, very light.

pointless upgrading the front derailleur, LX is fine.
Daoooo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 12:32 PM   #11
dvdauthority
The Cannondale Kid
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Baltimore/DC area
Bikes: Cannondale Prophet 2000
Posts: 22
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I guess I just want my bike to be all XT. And this might sound stupid, but based on this picture, can anyone tell me what type of front derailer I have (bottom pull, top pull)?

dvdauthority is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 12:40 PM   #12
jeff williams
I couldn't car less.
 
jeff williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Posts: 4,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Bottom pull.
jeff williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 12:43 PM   #13
Drunken Chicken
Senior Member
 
Drunken Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain, although I'm Hungarian
Bikes: Check signature
Posts: 1,855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff williams
Bottom pull.
How can you determine if it's top or bottom pull? Just wondering.
Drunken Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 12:52 PM   #14
alcahueteria
Senior Member
 
alcahueteria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Bikes: Specialized AWOL, Soma Juice
Posts: 1,022
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I was thinking bottom pull too. It just looks like it would need a force in the downward direction to to cause the derailler to pivot up. I don't really know though, just guessing.
alcahueteria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 12:58 PM   #15
superdex
staring at the mountains
 
superdex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Parker, CO
Bikes: 1x9 mtb commuter, Javelin Boca
Posts: 3,735
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 33 Post(s)
it's (from) where the cable connects to the derailleur, in this case, from the bottom --pulling the cable actuates the derailleur (releasing the cable allows the derailleur's spring to pull it back) check out Sheldon Brown's Glossary here, where Top-pull and top-swing are defined right next to each other

(edit: Top-pull being the opposite of bottom-pull )
superdex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 12:59 PM   #16
jeff williams
I couldn't car less.
 
jeff williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Posts: 4,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drunken Chicken
How can you determine if it's top or bottom pull? Just wondering.
A guess. Also I don't think top pull would work FS? No connected seattube.
jeff williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 02:09 PM   #17
Drunken Chicken
Senior Member
 
Drunken Chicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain, although I'm Hungarian
Bikes: Check signature
Posts: 1,855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by superdex
it's (from) where the cable connects to the derailleur, in this case, from the bottom --pulling the cable actuates the derailleur (releasing the cable allows the derailleur's spring to pull it back) check out Sheldon Brown's Glossary here, where Top-pull and top-swing are defined right next to each other

(edit: Top-pull being the opposite of bottom-pull )
OK, thanks.
Drunken Chicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 03:05 PM   #18
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff williams
A guess. Also I don't think top pull would work FS? No connected seattube.


It does on mine. It depends on how the cables are routed more than the frame itself


EDIT: I need to rephrase that. Actually the frame DOES play into it my lower front pivot would block the routing for a bottom pull
__________________

Last edited by Raiyn; 05-04-05 at 01:23 AM.
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 05:48 PM   #19
jeff williams
I couldn't car less.
 
jeff williams's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Bikes: Ritchey P-series prototype, Diamondback, Nishiki Triathelon Pro.
Posts: 4,395
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raiyn
It does on mine. It depends on how the cables are routed more than the frame itself[/color]
-as soon as I wrote I figured someone probably had, let someone post contrary.
A frame with both would be good for custom building.
Do you see any aspects of an upper pull that makes it better for FS?
I can think of possible fouling\damage to the cable or guide on a lower pull (FS or HT.)
jeff williams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 06:25 PM   #20
snoopz666
biketilldeath
 
snoopz666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: now residing in kamloops
Bikes: 2005 Norco Aline:D
Posts: 498
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daoooo
the brake sucks. piece of #$(*&( the screw on the brake lever will keep backing out, unless you put thread lock on it. rotor is very fragile, bent easily. hard to position the pads correctly.
however, it does provide nice braking power.

nice bike overall, very light.

pointless upgrading the front derailleur, LX is fine.
ok first of all i have HFX-9s and i have had very little problems with them. yes my leverage screw did back out, but that was before i sent hayes an email and the sent me some cool nylock inserts and i havent had a problem since. i havent had a problem with my rotor yet either the rear one has a slight rub to it, but guess what, disk brakes rub. and the pads are really easy too. just push the pistons back but the pads in put the calipur on put a buisness card in between the rotor and the pad pump you brake lever and then center the calipur.

it looks like you picked up a sweet bike. doesnt look like it needs any upgrading at all. just replace the stuff as it breaks.
snoopz666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 07:25 PM   #21
zeddybear
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 57
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Dont go for XTR. XTR is a little lighter (5-10 g) and weaker than xt.
zeddybear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 07:41 PM   #22
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeddybear
Dont go for XTR. XTR is a little lighter (5-10 g) and weaker than xt.
The new XTR front derailleur pivot link is 50% wider for a 110% increase in rigidity. You get a faster and more responsive shifting action plus a longer service life. The derailleur also includes the new "Dual Pull" feature that allows it to be used with top or bottom cable routing. The multi-clamp adapter allows the medium 31.8mm size derailleur clamp to fit 28.6mm frame tubes. Two sealed bearings at critical pivot points reduce the shifting effort.

From Shimano... tell me how its weaker?
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-05, 08:31 PM   #23
Guest
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
When are you gonna get stuff like fuzzy dice and matching water bottles?

Anyway, nice bike!

Koffee
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-05, 01:17 AM   #24
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff williams
-as soon as I wrote I figured someone probably had, let someone post contrary.
A frame with both would be good for custom building.
Do you see any aspects of an upper pull that makes it better for FS?
I can think of possible fouling\damage to the cable or guide on a lower pull (FS or HT.)
Well a top pull / bottom swing is ideal on my bike due to the lower front pivot's location and the amount of space available on that frame tube. Beyond that, and having both, I see no advantage to either top or bottom pull, though I must confess I prefer the compact nature of a bottom swing derailer as opposed to a top swing.
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely
From Shimano... tell me how its weaker?
Answered your own question.
I'll admit the XTR front derailieurs are the shizznit. I really liked the last model they had. XTR as a WHOLE won't last as long as XT will. They've had excellent front derailer's though.
__________________

Last edited by Raiyn; 05-04-05 at 01:29 AM.
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-05, 01:30 AM   #25
Hopper
Ride bike or bike ride?
 
Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Bikes: MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike
Posts: 1,447
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Don't worry about brakes, yours will be fine. If you do want to upgrade them older Shimano XT brakes were the bomb, also you won't need a new hub to use them. Also look ad Avid Juicy 5's or if you do XC (which I would assume from type of bike) try out some Hope mini's. Also for XC, as long as you aren't a big person (and I mean no offence by that) you will only need 6 inch rotors. But as I said the brakes should be fine.
Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM.