Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Fork and rear shock lockouts

    For those with full suspension bikes and lockouts, do you use them offroad? When given a choice between a bike without lockouts, or spending an extra 250 to get a bike with lockouts (and a few other upgrades) would you go for the lockouts?

  2. #2
    Senior Member alcahueteria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    My Bikes
    Soma Juice
    Posts
    1,020
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My roommate has a '05 jekyll which he has always locked out, the rear the shock that is, the front doesn't lock out.

  3. #3
    bac
    bac is offline
    Senior Member bac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    My Bikes
    Too many to list!
    Posts
    7,488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by buraianto
    For those with full suspension bikes and lockouts, do you use them offroad? When given a choice between a bike without lockouts, or spending an extra 250 to get a bike with lockouts (and a few other upgrades) would you go for the lockouts?
    The Fox F100X fork has an auto-lockout. It's sweeeeeeeeeeeeeet.

  4. #4
    LSU Alum jameyj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    TX
    My Bikes
    2006 Trek 2100D - 2005 Giant NRS - 2004.5 Giant Suede
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by alcahueteria
    My roommate has a '05 jekyll which he has always locked out, the rear the shock that is, the front doesn't lock out.

    If he always has it locked out then why did he get a FS bike? He would have been better served getting a HT.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Canada
    My Bikes
    Trek Fuel 98
    Posts
    151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a few theories about lockouts:

    1) Unless they are remotely controlled, you will never (or very rarely use them). Unfortunately, remote lockouts add cables and clutter to the cockpit.

    2) If the fork or shock have a stable peddaling platform (such as the Fox ProPedal), the lockout becomes much less critical.

    3) If the bike rear triangle is designed well and the stable pedaling platform is effective, lockouts are almost useless - unless you are a racer and need to put a lot of emphasis in strong starts and uphill pedaling efficiency.

    So what does all that mean? For me (I have a Trek Fuel 98) it means that I never use the lockouts, front or back. I simply find that the bike is remarkably efficient. Once in a while the shock lockout (mine is not remotely controlled making it even more useless) gets flipped to the locked position (by a branch or something) and I hardly notice that it is locked. And it is usually rough terrain that makes me notice that the shock is locked. Pedaling alone does not (unless I jum out of the saddle). Of course, I tend to pedal in the saddle and I naturally go for a rotary motion so a locked shock gives me minimal advantage.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •