Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Why run 2.5 on front but 2.3 tyre on rear?

    Just found this comment made by MBUK magazine when reviewing a Conti Diesel tyre:
    "If you like freeride and enduro style riding, the perfect tyre combo for this season has to be a Diesel up front with a narrower 2.3 in Continental Gravity tyre out back"

    Why would you run a narrower tyre on the rear? Is it a case of the front of the bike absorbing more of the bump impact?

    This would be good on my bike cos the chain is rubbing on the tyre when in the lowest gear! And the tyres sometime rub on the inside of the frame at the bike but I'm not bothered about that.

  2. #2
    Ouch!!!
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tire width selection is a combination of personal preference as well as functionality.

    The front tire typically benefits from a greater width as more surface area is in contact with the ground. This gives better grip during turns on loose ground. As well, a wider tire does absorb impact a bit more then a narrower one, as you mentioned.

    The rear tire is not exposed to lateral forces as much as the front, so it doesn't benefit from a wider width as much (unless you climb a lot on loose terrain).

    It's not an absolute science.

    Oh, and your tires shouldn't be rubbing on anything - chain or frame.
    "Do, or do not - there is no 'try'."
    Yoda

    RIP sydney.

  3. #3
    Ride bike or bike ride? Hopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    My Bikes
    MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike
    Posts
    1,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Most people will run a thinner rear tyre than front. When turning most of the force to turn is put through the front wheel so it needs a bigger surface area, also having mire rubber on the front can reduce a little bit of shock on the arms. Smaller rear will make it easier to pedal, less surface touching ground where the power is transmitted. Also as less sideways forces are needed on rear why create more drag?

    FWIW i run a 2.35" rear and 2.5 front for DH.
    --------------------------------------------------------o__ ----
    ------------------------_-------_---|-\---------_---- _.>/ _ --------------
    _______________________| - \________(_)_\(_)_______\|/_______\|/______...

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilltop Hoods
    Aint it amazing how courageous human beings are?

  4. #4
    Senior Member Brian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Between the mountains and the lake.
    My Bikes
    8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
    Posts
    16,745
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hopper, I still owe you a photo of my wife's FS bike.

    Back on topic, we've wanted to run some really fat tires on our tandem (we can probably fit a 3" up front) for a while. But since we have no way to transport it right now, we'd be riding across town, wasting energy and rubber. What's a good suggestion for in the 2.2-2.5 range for Australia's combination of loose dirt/gravel over hardpack?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    97
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    2.5" must be ridiculously wide. A 'wide' tyre to me is 1.95" but I normally run 1.8". Would the same principal of better cornering still apply to a 1.95 front and 1.8 rear? If so I might be tempted to give that a go.

  6. #6
    Ride bike or bike ride? Hopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Adelaide, Australia
    My Bikes
    MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike
    Posts
    1,447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    For Aus conditions, a good setup would be either 2.35 front and rear or 2.35 rearand 2.5 front. Prob the latter if you are going to be doing some loose. I prefer maxxis and would prob run a 2.5 ST Highroller on the front and a 2.35 ST Minnion DHR on the rear.
    --------------------------------------------------------o__ ----
    ------------------------_-------_---|-\---------_---- _.>/ _ --------------
    _______________________| - \________(_)_\(_)_______\|/_______\|/______...

    Quote Originally Posted by Hilltop Hoods
    Aint it amazing how courageous human beings are?

  7. #7
    eert a ekil yzarc SpiderMike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2000
    Location
    Pasadena TX
    My Bikes
    many bikes
    Posts
    2,559
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Back in the days of riding BMX, I would run 2.125 up front and a 1.75 (Tioga Comp III all the way). I kept that up on the MTN bikes. Currently running the same sizes just to see if there is any difference. Not much difference noticed during slow speed turns. 2.00 on bike1 and 2.20 on bike2. Going to get a 2.4 for the front the of bike2.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    138
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I just bought those exact tires, conti diesel and gravity last week and there fantastic. Farily light, roll well, cusion bumps more and grip best on loose damp foresty stuff.

  9. #9
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jst0076
    2.5" must be ridiculously wide.
    It's no 3" Gazzalodi

  10. #10
    Local Genius
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    618
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ARG WHY oh WHY did Zocchi make my 66rc 2.8 max... or my dirtbag 2.8 max NOOOOOOOOOO

  11. #11
    la vache fantôme phantomcow2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    6,266
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    2.8?! Thats huge! The biggest i will run is 2.1, MAYBE one step up in size for a muddy time.
    C://dos
    C://dos.run
    run.dos.run

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •