Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-05, 03:57 AM   #1
Chiz
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 13
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why run 2.5 on front but 2.3 tyre on rear?

Just found this comment made by MBUK magazine when reviewing a Conti Diesel tyre:
"If you like freeride and enduro style riding, the perfect tyre combo for this season has to be a Diesel up front with a narrower 2.3 in Continental Gravity tyre out back"

Why would you run a narrower tyre on the rear? Is it a case of the front of the bike absorbing more of the bump impact?

This would be good on my bike cos the chain is rubbing on the tyre when in the lowest gear! And the tyres sometime rub on the inside of the frame at the bike but I'm not bothered about that.
Chiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 04:11 AM   #2
shane45
Ouch!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Tire width selection is a combination of personal preference as well as functionality.

The front tire typically benefits from a greater width as more surface area is in contact with the ground. This gives better grip during turns on loose ground. As well, a wider tire does absorb impact a bit more then a narrower one, as you mentioned.

The rear tire is not exposed to lateral forces as much as the front, so it doesn't benefit from a wider width as much (unless you climb a lot on loose terrain).

It's not an absolute science.

Oh, and your tires shouldn't be rubbing on anything - chain or frame.
shane45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 04:24 AM   #3
Hopper
Ride bike or bike ride?
 
Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Bikes: MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike
Posts: 1,447
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Most people will run a thinner rear tyre than front. When turning most of the force to turn is put through the front wheel so it needs a bigger surface area, also having mire rubber on the front can reduce a little bit of shock on the arms. Smaller rear will make it easier to pedal, less surface touching ground where the power is transmitted. Also as less sideways forces are needed on rear why create more drag?

FWIW i run a 2.35" rear and 2.5 front for DH.
Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 05:10 AM   #4
Brian
Senior Member
 
Brian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Between the mountains and the lake.
Bikes: 8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
Posts: 16,683
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hopper, I still owe you a photo of my wife's FS bike.

Back on topic, we've wanted to run some really fat tires on our tandem (we can probably fit a 3" up front) for a while. But since we have no way to transport it right now, we'd be riding across town, wasting energy and rubber. What's a good suggestion for in the 2.2-2.5 range for Australia's combination of loose dirt/gravel over hardpack?
Brian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 05:38 AM   #5
jst0076
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 97
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
2.5" must be ridiculously wide. A 'wide' tyre to me is 1.95" but I normally run 1.8". Would the same principal of better cornering still apply to a 1.95 front and 1.8 rear? If so I might be tempted to give that a go.
jst0076 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 06:33 AM   #6
Hopper
Ride bike or bike ride?
 
Hopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Bikes: MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike
Posts: 1,447
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For Aus conditions, a good setup would be either 2.35 front and rear or 2.35 rearand 2.5 front. Prob the latter if you are going to be doing some loose. I prefer maxxis and would prob run a 2.5 ST Highroller on the front and a 2.35 ST Minnion DHR on the rear.
Hopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 10:15 AM   #7
SpiderMike
eert a ekil yzarc
 
SpiderMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pasadena TX
Bikes: many bikes
Posts: 2,558
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Back in the days of riding BMX, I would run 2.125 up front and a 1.75 (Tioga Comp III all the way). I kept that up on the MTN bikes. Currently running the same sizes just to see if there is any difference. Not much difference noticed during slow speed turns. 2.00 on bike1 and 2.20 on bike2. Going to get a 2.4 for the front the of bike2.
SpiderMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 11:06 AM   #8
JohnnyTheFox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 138
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I just bought those exact tires, conti diesel and gravity last week and there fantastic. Farily light, roll well, cusion bumps more and grip best on loose damp foresty stuff.
JohnnyTheFox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 05:58 PM   #9
Raiyn
I drink your MILKSHAKE
 
Raiyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Posts: 15,061
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jst0076
2.5" must be ridiculously wide.
It's no 3" Gazzalodi
__________________
Raiyn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 06:53 PM   #10
snakehunter
Local Genius
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 618
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
ARG WHY oh WHY did Zocchi make my 66rc 2.8 max... or my dirtbag 2.8 max NOOOOOOOOOO
snakehunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-05, 09:02 PM   #11
phantomcow2
la vache fantôme
 
phantomcow2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NH
Bikes:
Posts: 6,266
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
2.8?! Thats huge! The biggest i will run is 2.1, MAYBE one step up in size for a muddy time.
__________________
C://dos
C://dos.run
run.dos.run
phantomcow2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 PM.