Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    441
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Nashbar sunglasses?

    How are the Nashbar sunglasses? I'm looking at the Ares in particular..

    If they're not good, what other glasses would you recommend that's around the same price?

  2. #2
    Senior Member iamthetas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    colonial heights Va
    My Bikes
    Devinci Guzzler, 04 Canadian version
    Posts
    1,200
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am very happy with Tifosi. cheap,durable,scratch resistent, break resistent, multiple lenses, lots of frame styles and colors. available at local shops only as far as I know. the most expensive pair Ive seen was $50
    for the creation was subjected to futility,not willingly , but because of Him who subjected it in hope...that he might be the firstborn among many brethren. Romans 8:20-29
    the truth may not always be popular but its always true
    http://mysite.verizon.net/vzer3fnu/p...pcomingevents/

  3. #3
    is slower than you Peek the Geek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    WI
    My Bikes
    Gunnar Sport, Marin Pine Mountain, Gunnar Ruffian, Gunnar Roadie, BMC Fourstroke, Salsa Vaya
    Posts
    1,493
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't have any experience with the Nashbar sunglasses, but I'd imagine they're pretty much identical to the Performance brand (being the same company and all). I've worn a couple pair of the Performance shades, and I think they're a great deal. My main beef was that they didn't have rubber grips on the nosepads, but I know the newer ones do, oh and they can fog easily in the rain. Plus they came with three sets of lenses. I like them a lot.

    Compared to other brands, I can say this:

    The optics are as pretty much as good as those on my $100 pair of Smith Sliders, and the frames feel just as sturdy. My Smiths came with three sets of lenses, as well, so that's a wash. I'd say my Smiths just seem to fit better, but that's comparing apples and oranges since the two styles are different. Also, they don't fog quite as much as the Performance ones.

    On the other hand, the Performance/Nashbar glasses are no comparison to my Rudy Project Rydons. The Rudy's optics are far nicer and the lenses don't fog easily at all. The frames themselves are far sturdier than the Performance or Smiths, and they fit amazingly well. I've never had a pair of shades that fit as well, and the earpieces are infinitely adjustable. The one downfall is that they only included one set of lenses and extra sets are at least $30 a piece. But, the supplied lens is a red color that is really versatile. I only find myself wanting when the light is really dim, so I may buy a clear set. I paid $130 for the Rudys, and I would pay it again in a second.

    Bottom line... The Nashbars would probably be a great deal if you were looking to spend $30 or less. If you want some thing a little higher end, try Smith, but find some on sale. I wouldn't pay full price for Smiths. If you want a sweet pair of technical sunglasses that are a joy to put on, and you're willing to shell out some dough, Rudy Projects are the answer.
    Proud supporter of the Chippewa Off-Road Bike Association (CORBA)
    www.chippewaoffroad.org


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •