Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Senior Member JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Grand Record LTD
    Posts
    1,652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hi All,

    I recently purchased and 2005 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo and am slowly making the transition from riding it on the roads to riding off road. My last mtb was a Trek 950 Singletrack that had slicks and I had a wireless computer that worked fine. It was a dB 4LW Wireless Cyclocomputer: http://www.performancebike.com/shop/...tegory_ID=4110

    However, when I tried to mount it to my new bike I couldn't move the pickup close enough to the spokes to get the computer to work.

    Can anyone recommend a good, not ridiculously expensive wireless computer for an mtb ???

    Thanks,

    J.

  2. #2
    LSU Alum jameyj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    TX
    My Bikes
    2006 Trek 2100D - 2005 Giant NRS - 2004.5 Giant Suede
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Cateye Micro Wireless - http://www.cateye.com/en/products/vi...d=6&subCatId=0

    I have a Rockshox Duke XC fork on my NRS and the wired computer would not fit. I put the Cateye Micro Wireless on and it works perfectly. Great computer and the new ones have a nice little backlight now. Great for when you ride at night.
    Please consider supporting my efforts to help those with MS. -<>- jbj2

  3. #3
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,588
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    That's the computer I have on my Marzocchi Marathon SL as well. I also had it on my White Brothers with no problems.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  4. #4
    Senior Member JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Grand Record LTD
    Posts
    1,652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Ok, Cateye seems to be the way to go....
    Do you understand my problem though ?
    It's not that I can't get the sensor to attach to the fork blade.
    It's that the fork blade is so far away from the spokes that I had my old sensor
    perpendicular to the fork blade and it still wasn't picking up the magnet on the spoke.

    Thanks again guys !

    Haven't been on the Bike Forums in awhile....lot of us New Englanders spent alot of time on the forum grumbling about the weather in February, March, & April but as soon as the weather turned I forgot all about the computer and have been out riding or working in the yard

    J.

  5. #5
    LSU Alum jameyj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    TX
    My Bikes
    2006 Trek 2100D - 2005 Giant NRS - 2004.5 Giant Suede
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That is the same problem I had with my wired computer until I switched to the wireless one. So it should work. I would go down to your LBS and ask them to look at your bike and verify that it will work.

    What type of fork, bike and wheel are you using this for? That might help to know as others might have the same similar combination and could tell you what they use.
    Please consider supporting my efforts to help those with MS. -<>- jbj2

  6. #6
    Senior Member JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Grand Record LTD
    Posts
    1,652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Totally stock Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo w/RockShox Pilot SL 100mm travel...rest of the specs are on the link.
    http://www.fisherbikes.com/bikes/bik...esis&bike=HKEK

    Quote Originally Posted by jameyj
    That is the same problem I had with my wired computer until I switched to the wireless one. So it should work. I would go down to your LBS and ask them to look at your bike and verify that it will work.

    What type of fork, bike and wheel are you using this for? That might help to know as others might have the same similar combination and could tell you what they use.

  7. #7
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,588
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Stupid question, but will it not even work when you get down close to the hub since that is closer to the fork?
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  8. #8
    Senior Member JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Grand Record LTD
    Posts
    1,652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The spacing difference is not that great until you get real close to the hub. Plus, there is a 60cm limit between the sending unit on the fork blade & the receiving unit on the handlebars too...
    Their site is www.filzer.com it's the DB4 model. You can check the manual that's in PDF format.


    Whoa, wait I just checked, 60cm translates to nearly 24 inches.....I don't know why it won't work
    Maybe it's the operator


    Quote Originally Posted by LowCel
    Stupid question, but will it not even work when you get down close to the hub since that is closer to the fork?

  9. #9
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,588
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    LOL, it was just a thought. A lot of the time the simplest solution is overlooked, was hoping this would be one of those times.
    Last edited by LowCel; 06-28-05 at 01:31 PM.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  10. #10
    LSU Alum jameyj's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    TX
    My Bikes
    2006 Trek 2100D - 2005 Giant NRS - 2004.5 Giant Suede
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sounds like a product design issue. The Cateye will work just fine and it is a rock solid product. I have two Cateye computers and one of them has taken some tough abuse and I has never given me a problem.
    Please consider supporting my efforts to help those with MS. -<>- jbj2

  11. #11
    Senior Member JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Grand Record LTD
    Posts
    1,652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by jameyj
    Sounds like a product design issue. The Cateye will work just fine and it is a rock solid product. I have two Cateye computers and one of them has taken some tough abuse and I has never given me a problem.
    Well I'm going to try and slide the sending unit down the fork blade to see if I can get it to read properly. (someone was nice enough to point that out )
    If that doesn't work I'm heading straight for a Cateye...

  12. #12
    pnj
    pnj is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    1,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    if it's a 'line of site' device, you need to make sure that the two devices (transmitter and receiver) can 'see' each other.

    like with your TV remote, if your wife stands in front of the TV, you can't change the channel.....
    4130

  13. #13
    Senior Member JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Grand Record LTD
    Posts
    1,652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pnj
    if it's a 'line of site' device, you need to make sure that the two devices (transmitter and receiver) can 'see' each other.

    like with your TV remote, if your wife stands in front of the TV, you can't change the channel.....
    Now if that isn't the voice of experience I don't know what is.....

  14. #14
    Senior Member CranxOC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    OC, California
    My Bikes
    '04 Specialized Stumpy FSR Pro (Frame and Shock Only)
    Posts
    504
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by JoeOxfordCT
    Hi All,

    I recently purchased and 2005 Gary Fisher Hoo Koo E Koo and am slowly making the transition from riding it on the roads to riding off road. My last mtb was a Trek 950 Singletrack that had slicks and I had a wireless computer that worked fine. It was a dB 4LW Wireless Cyclocomputer: http://www.performancebike.com/shop/...tegory_ID=4110

    However, when I tried to mount it to my new bike I couldn't move the pickup close enough to the spokes to get the computer to work.

    Can anyone recommend a good, not ridiculously expensive wireless computer for an mtb ???

    Thanks,

    J.

    Dude, it's not the fork, it's the user. There's really no such thing as a "wide fork" so you really just need to figure out how to mount your sensor so that it works. If you're not able to figure it out, take it to your LBS and have them put it on; I guarantee your current computer will work with your current fork.
    "If the facts don't fit the theory, change the facts." - Albert Einstein

  15. #15
    pnj
    pnj is offline
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    1,083
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by CranxOC
    Dude, it's not the fork, it's the user. There's really no such thing as a "wide fork" so you really just need to figure out how to mount your sensor so that it works. If you're not able to figure it out, take it to your LBS and have them put it on; I guarantee your current computer will work with your current fork.

    not with mine.
    there was no way to mount the sensor so that the computer could 'see' it.

    when I took it back to the store they looked at me like a deer caught in the headlights......:|
    4130

  16. #16
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by pnj
    like with your TV remote, if your wife stands in front of the TV, you can't change the channel.....
    Weird... My wife's always complaining about me standing in front of the TV when she's trying to change the channel.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  17. #17
    Senior Member JoeOxfordCT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    Motobecane Grand Record LTD
    Posts
    1,652
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I did look again at the setup this morning and I noted 2 things:

    Moving the magnet/sensor towards the hub will not make much of a difference until you get right on top of the hub, there's just not that much taper.

    I think the crown in my fork may be blocking the line of sight between the sending unit & receiving unit.

    I haven't pulled my old bike down from the garage to check and see if the line of sight is any different but I am going to check tonight when I have more time....



    Quote Originally Posted by CranxOC
    Dude, it's not the fork, it's the user. There's really no such thing as a "wide fork" so you really just need to figure out how to mount your sensor so that it works. If you're not able to figure it out, take it to your LBS and have them put it on; I guarantee your current computer will work with your current fork.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •