Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is there a standard thickness that all metal is within the bike frames made nowadays? Reason I ask is when I took my seat off and the bracket to tighten it you could obviously look down into the seatpost of the bike. The metal I expected to be a little thicker, but hey I guess the manufacturer's know what they're doing. I wasn't sure if the extra heavy duty bikes use thicker metal or a different kind or what.

    Kind of a strange question, I know. I just figured I'd ask.

    Another side question: Does Giant use the same frame for all of their sport mountain hardtails?? (except the boulder which uses supersized steel). Reason I ask is the Boulder SE which MSRP's for 280 has the ALUXX SL butted aluminum frame. But even the Rainier, that MSRP's for 850 dollars has the ALUXX SL butted aluminum frame. I just figured the Rainier would have a different kind of frame. Is this saying the Boulder SE has a damn good frame for the price, the Rainier has a cheap frame for the price, or the frame is to a point it's so strong it doesn't matter how you use it so Giant puts them on all of the sport mountain hardtails?
    Last edited by Roasted; 07-09-05 at 08:09 AM.

  2. #2
    Lost in the Black Hills mx_599's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roasted
    Is there a standard thickness that all metal is within the bike frames made nowadays? Reason I ask is when I took my seat off and the bracket to tighten it you could obviously look down into the seatpost of the bike. The metal I expected to be a little thicker, but hey I guess the manufacturer's know what they're doing. I wasn't sure if the extra heavy duty bikes use thicker metal or a different kind or what.
    A ton of factors:

    1) intended use

    2) frame material

    3) butting

    4) gusseting

    5) diameter

    my opinion anyway...

  3. #3
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mx_599
    A ton of factors:

    1) intended use

    2) frame material

    3) butting

    4) gusseting

    5) diameter

    my opinion anyway...
    Yeah I know, all of them in the description has the same material, butting, and gusseting... I know for a fact when I saw the Rincon in person the only difference was a different shifter and double walled rims.

    I just wasn't sure if there was much of a difference. Because... I can't tell a single difference. But not just between these Giant models, with a lot of other frames out there. I mean sure diameter makes a difference and all, which I have noticed some other bikes differ. I guess it's hard to look inside the bike and see the thickness of the metal contained in the frame.

  4. #4
    Lost in the Black Hills mx_599's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roasted
    Yeah I know, all of them in the description has the same material, butting, and gusseting... I know for a fact when I saw the Rincon in person the only difference was a different shifter and double walled rims.

    I just wasn't sure if there was much of a difference. Because... I can't tell a single difference.
    Not sure...someone else with more experience will probably post later.

  5. #5
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    New question: I've been reading more about aluminum and steel frames. Everything I read, it's either one way or the other. It seems like whenever I find a different frame thats say steel, it just goes on and on about how great steel is. Same with aluminum. I've been having a hard time finding the actual DIFFERENCE between steel and aluminum frames.

    I'm pretty sure steel is heavier, but I was under the assumption aluminum was stronger. What's the case? Can anybody clear up this confusion?

    btw - what makes for a good frame? I came across this one. http://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...+Frame+04.aspx
    For the price, what are your impressions? (not planning on buying this, or a frame at all. Just trying to decifier the differences)

  6. #6
    Lost in the Black Hills mx_599's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roasted
    New question: I've been reading more about aluminum and steel frames. Everything I read, it's either one way or the other. It seems like whenever I find a different frame thats say steel, it just goes on and on about how great steel is. Same with aluminum. I've been having a hard time finding the actual DIFFERENCE between steel and aluminum frames.

    I'm pretty sure steel is heavier, but I was under the assumption aluminum was stronger. What's the case? Can anybody clear up this confusion?

    btw - what makes for a good frame? I came across this one. http://www.jensonusa.com/store/produ...+Frame+04.aspx
    For the price, what are your impressions? (not planning on buying this, or a frame at all. Just trying to decifier the differences)
    One major difference in material is rigidity. All specs being equal, Al is more rigid. This doesn't mean it's better.

  7. #7
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mx_599
    One major difference in material is rigidity. All specs being equal, Al is more rigid. This doesn't mean it's better.
    So in general it's not a big deal, but if I have a toss up aluminum is the way to go.

    Hmmm...

    What about the 6061? Is that the kind of aluminum it is? What about integrated gussets? Double butted welds, etc?

    I'm just trying to know what to look for in a good frame, so if I go to a bike shop later on and see one I like I can firmly say "I'll take this one" without question.

  8. #8
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by mx_599
    One major difference in material is rigidity. All specs being equal, Al is more rigid. This doesn't mean it's better.
    That's actually wrong. The reason why aluminum frame bikes are stiffer is because of the shape or rather the diameter of the tubing. Steel actually has a higher elastic modulus than aluminum (around about three times as much) and thus for the same diameter and thickness will deflect less when subjected to the same force. However, bikes made of aluminum generally have larger diameter tubes. This greater effective cross-section means the structure will be more rigid. The reason for this is twofolds.

    1. Stiffness - A small diameter aluminum bike is very noodily. Ask anyone who's ridden early aluminum road bikes or anyone who's ridden one of the Trek aluminum MTBs from the early 1990s. Increasing the size of the aluminum tubes makes the structure as a whole much stiffer. This was the hallmark of big-tube aluminum frames as popularised by Cannondale and Klein.
    2. Lifespan - Aluminum unlike steel has no endurance or fatigue limit. This means that unlike steel which will plateau at a certain fatigue strength when cycled a certain number of times, aluminum's fatigue strength will continue to decline the more it's cycled. Once you hit steel's endurance limit, you can continue to cycle the material at or below that load with impunity... forever. With aluminum, it will eventually fail because at some point the S-N (stress to cycle) curve dictates that the material can no longer support any cycles regardless of load. The answer to this is to design the structure in such a manner that it is extremely stiff and thus will never see a load high enough to cause a failure within a respectable lifetime. One way to keep the loads low is to use large cross-sections or effective cross-sections of material.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  9. #9
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Khuon, I'm sorry... I lost you somewhere in your response.

    Bottom line: If I were to buy a new frame, what would you suggest? And what features on a frame regardless of the kind of metal should I look out for? (as far as weld quality, etc).

  10. #10
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roasted
    Khuon, I'm sorry... I lost you somewhere in your response.

    Bottom line: If I were to buy a new frame, what would you suggest? And what features on a frame regardless of the kind of metal should I look out for? (as far as weld quality, etc).
    There's too many variables for me to give a single answer. It all depends on your criteria. Each frame material has its pros and cons. What are you looking for specifically in a frame. Additionally, the material is generally immaterial. The construction and design matter most.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  11. #11
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    There's too many variables for me to give a single answer. It all depends on your criteria. Each frame material has its pros and cons. What are you looking for specifically in a frame. Additionally, the material is generally immaterial. The construction and design matter most.
    I just want something that will last a good long time, but most importantly be able to support a few hard hits if I decide to take it on some heavier trails. I'm not going to be doing any 10 foot jumps but I woulnd't mind hitting a few hard logs or rocks too.

    Something that just has good overall functionality.

  12. #12
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Please don't take offense but I would suggest you not try to engineer the bike yourself. That is to say that you should concern yourself with the ride quality, fit and usage parameters that the manufacturers and thus the designers have specified. Trust in the bike designers to have done their job in picking the right materials and determining the right design and geometry. Generally speaking if you use the bike within its intended scope of application then you should be okay. In general, most people will tell you that aluminum bikes are designed with a lifespan to be ridden hard (at their design limits) for anywhere between three to five years. If you're not being especially harsh on the bike then it will last longer. Steel bikes usually last a little longer. That said, I've seen MTBs of both steel as well as aluminum that are well over 10 years old that have seen extensive trail time. I've also seen bikes of both materials last no more than a couple of months. The durability and longevity is less a function of material and more of overall design and use/care.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  13. #13
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    Please don't take offense but I would suggest you not try to engineer the bike yourself. That is to say that you should concern yourself with the ride quality, fit and usage parameters that the manufacturers and thus the designers have specified. Trust in the bike designers to have done their job in picking the right materials and determining the right design and geometry. Generally speaking if you use the bike within its intended scope of application then you should be okay. In general, most people will tell you that aluminum bikes are designed with a lifespan to be ridden hard (at their design limits) for anywhere between three to five years. If you're not being especially harsh on the bike then it will last longer. Steel bikes usually last a little longer. That said, I've seen MTBs of both steel as well as aluminum that are well over 10 years old that have seen extensive trail time. I've also seen bikes of both materials last no more than a couple of months. The durability and longevity is less a function of material and more of overall design and use/care.
    I understand. I'm just trying to understand frames more so I know what to look for IF I'd get a new frame. I don't plan on getting a new frame, but hell if mine cracks in half then I want to go to the bike shop and be able to pick one up. It's just I don't understand the difference from one to another, that's all I'm trying to do is to be able to decifier what's suitable for me, what materials work better for me, etc etc etc.

    I'm sticking with my frame until it dies. But when/if that time comes, I just want to have enough knowledge to do the deciding on my own.

  14. #14
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    1. Lifespan - Aluminum unlike steel has no endurance or fatigue limit. .
    May want to double check how you phrase that.

  15. #15
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiyn
    May want to double check how you phrase that.
    Hmmm... what's wrong with how it's phrased?
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  16. #16
    Ono! sestivers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    My Bikes
    2006 Cannondale R800
    Posts
    643
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm wondering the same thing. You pretty much explained the definitions 4.0
    Steve

  17. #17
    Lost in the Black Hills mx_599's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    That's actually wrong.
    I know about Young's Modulus too.

    Steel actually has a higher elastic modulus than aluminum (around about three times as much)
    ...and weighs nearly 3 times as much
    Last edited by mx_599; 07-10-05 at 04:59 AM.

  18. #18
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    Hmmm... what's wrong with how it's phrased?
    Aluminum does have an initial rated endurance and fatigue life, the rest is dead on.
    I watch those Engineering Disaster shows on the History Channel and I've seen the Airline Metal Fatigue one a dozen time or more so I know that AL is rated

  19. #19
    DEADBEEF khuon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
    My Bikes
    1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
    Posts
    12,155
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiyn
    Aluminum does have an initial rated endurance and fatigue life, the rest is dead on.
    It has a rated endurance and fatigue life but it does not actually have an endurance and fatigue limit. The curve just keeps dropping unlike with steel which plateaus at a certain fatigue strength after a certain number of cycles. For purposes of designing an aluminum structure, the fatigue strength and endurance limit is "effectively considered" to be at 500 million cycles which is to say that those values are taken into account when a structure is designed. Thus a conservative design will try to limit the loads on the structure to that less than the fatigue strength of the material at 500 million cycles.
    1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte OCP Club Member
    "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122

  20. #20
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    It has a rated endurance and fatigue life but it does not actually have an endurance and fatigue limit.
    See that's what I was having an issue with, the whole "limit vs. life" bit can be a touch confusing for some and I wanted you to clarify a bit. Aluminum also has load stress limits just like steel and pound for pound steel is generally stronger.

    You know your stuff Khoun (especially when it comes to computers and planes ) I just want you to expound a bit

  21. #21
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm a little confused.

    What the hell is a fatigue limit? If my bike reaches that, does it just explode or something?

  22. #22
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    33
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    That's actually wrong. The reason why aluminum frame bikes are stiffer is because of the shape or rather the diameter of the tubing. Steel actually has a higher elastic modulus than aluminum (around about three times as much) and thus for the same diameter and thickness will deflect less when subjected to the same force. However, bikes made of aluminum generally have larger diameter tubes. This greater effective cross-section means the structure will be more rigid. The reason for this is twofolds.

    1. Stiffness - A small diameter aluminum bike is very noodily. Ask anyone who's ridden early aluminum road bikes or anyone who's ridden one of the Trek aluminum MTBs from the early 1990s. Increasing the size of the aluminum tubes makes the structure as a whole much stiffer. This was the hallmark of big-tube aluminum frames as popularised by Cannondale and Klein.
    2. Lifespan - Aluminum unlike steel has no endurance or fatigue limit. This means that unlike steel which will plateau at a certain fatigue strength when cycled a certain number of times, aluminum's fatigue strength will continue to decline the more it's cycled. Once you hit steel's endurance limit, you can continue to cycle the material at or below that load with impunity... forever. With aluminum, it will eventually fail because at some point the S-N (stress to cycle) curve dictates that the material can no longer support any cycles regardless of load. The answer to this is to design the structure in such a manner that it is extremely stiff and thus will never see a load high enough to cause a failure within a respectable lifetime. One way to keep the loads low is to use large cross-sections or effective cross-sections of material.

    khuon you're making me miss my materials science and machine design classes. Good times.

  23. #23
    Dismember harov3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    My Bikes
    Kona Kikapu/hoss deluxe mix, 1950's Malvern Star gent 28" turned into a stealth commuter with drums and a three speed.
    Posts
    695
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Roasted
    I'm a little confused.

    What the hell is a fatigue limit? If my bike reaches that, does it just explode or something?
    Do you know the scene in the Blues Brothers when they park the car for the last time? Its sort of like that. Try to be off the bike when it happens

  24. #24
    huffy owns
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania.
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Boulder SE hardtail, 2008 Diamondback Response Sport hardtail, 2008 KHS XC 204 full sus mt bike, 2010 GT GTR Series 3 road bike.
    Posts
    569
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by harov3
    Do you know the scene in the Blues Brothers when they park the car for the last time? Its sort of like that. Try to be off the bike when it happens
    I've never seen the Blues Brothers...................

  25. #25
    Lost in the Black Hills mx_599's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by khuon
    That's actually wrong. The reason why aluminum frame bikes are stiffer is because of the shape or rather the diameter of the tubing. Steel actually has a higher elastic modulus than aluminum (around about three times as much) and thus for the same diameter and thickness will deflect less when subjected to the same force. However, bikes made of aluminum generally have larger diameter tubes. This greater effective cross-section means the structure will be more rigid. The reason for this is twofolds.

    1. Stiffness - A small diameter aluminum bike is very noodily. Ask anyone who's ridden early aluminum road bikes or anyone who's ridden one of the Trek aluminum MTBs from the early 1990s. Increasing the size of the aluminum tubes makes the structure as a whole much stiffer. This was the hallmark of big-tube aluminum frames as popularised by Cannondale and Klein.
    2. Lifespan - Aluminum unlike steel has no endurance or fatigue limit. This means that unlike steel which will plateau at a certain fatigue strength when cycled a certain number of times, aluminum's fatigue strength will continue to decline the more it's cycled. Once you hit steel's endurance limit, you can continue to cycle the material at or below that load with impunity... forever. With aluminum, it will eventually fail because at some point the S-N (stress to cycle) curve dictates that the material can no longer support any cycles regardless of load. The answer to this is to design the structure in such a manner that it is extremely stiff and thus will never see a load high enough to cause a failure within a respectable lifetime. One way to keep the loads low is to use large cross-sections or effective cross-sections of material.
    Okay Mr. Wizard...I didn't realize everything had to be perfectly scientific on this site, but I'll keep that in mind before I let my fingers start pecking next time. I was simply trying to give Roasted a very "lay" answer. Fact is, Al frames are usually more rigid.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •