Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Kona Stinky

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Kona Stinky

    I would be greatful if someone could give me some advice. I am thinking about buying a Kona Stinky frame, but it comes without forks - this wouldnt normally be a problem, and i will put my Rock Shox onto the frame, but the Stinky normally has the forks that come right up to the handle bars. Sorry if that doesnt make much sense, but i am sure you will know what i am trying to say. Will my forks go onto the frame, or will they just go on, but not work properly?
    Any help would be great.

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Adios, Mofo J-McKech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SXSW central
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Brava, Surly Instigator FR
    Posts
    1,651
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deano
    and i will put my Rock Shox onto the frame, but the Stinky normally has the forks that come right up to the handle bars.

    I am Signature-less

  3. #3
    Old School Rad mtnbiker66's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    The old Mountains
    My Bikes
    Blur LT
    Posts
    8,212
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    How much travel does your rock shox have?? Your talkin' about a double crown fork. Are you gonna run a boxxer??
    Like a circus monkey on a stolen Harley......

  4. #4
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    100mm i think?
    Will a stinky be a good XC bike?

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sorry - whats a Boxxer?

  6. #6
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Your bike will feel heavily unbalanced with a short front end and the long travel rear end. Unless we are talking a 2001 stinky thats just not gonna be a good combo to ride and will feel VERY steep for a fr bike.

  7. #7
    UareFASTjustNOTfastENOUGH MasterSezFaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Amongst the hills in So.Cal.
    My Bikes
    Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Bianchi C2C 928
    Posts
    391
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deano
    I would be greatful if someone could give me some advice. I am thinking about buying a Kona Stinky frame, but it comes without forks - this wouldnt normally be a problem, and i will put my Rock Shox onto the frame, but the Stinky normally has the forks that come right up to the handle bars. Sorry if that doesnt make much sense, but i am sure you will know what i am trying to say. Will my forks go onto the frame, or will they just go on, but not work properly?
    Any help would be great.

    Thanks

    Depends on what year the frame is. Anything up to 2002 will work better with a single crown fork between 105mm and 125mm of travel (you could use a 130mm travel fork with out to much change in the handling). 2003 frame had a bit different geometry and more rear travel and were designed to use a fork with 130mm to 150mm of travel. You can however put a 130mm travel fork on a newer frame but it will handle poorly and I would definitely not put any thing less then 150mm on a 2006 frame.

    Someone might have answered before I finished typing but a boxxer is someone who fights in a square ring for money it is also a dual crown fork made by RockShox



  8. #8
    The geek on two wheels.
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Christchurch, New Zealand.
    My Bikes
    '06 Giant STP1 coming on its way.
    Posts
    70
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deano
    Will a stinky be a good XC bike?
    No. The Stinky is more of a freeride-oriented bike. It's a downright ***** to pedal and it's really heavy.

  9. #9
    Knows Bigfoot's Momma
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    SoCal
    My Bikes
    yeah; got a couple...
    Posts
    1,544
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by edf825
    It's a downright ***** to pedal and it's really heavy.
    Besides, never ride anything that's "stinky".... Stinky, heavy and ***** aren't a good combination.
    nice lugs baby!

  10. #10
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Depends what you consider heavy. I find the stinky a pretty reasonable weight for a fr bike. It makes a great fr/trail bike.

    Don't mask the swear words. Let the censor script do its job.

  11. #11
    UareFASTjustNOTfastENOUGH MasterSezFaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Amongst the hills in So.Cal.
    My Bikes
    Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Bianchi C2C 928
    Posts
    391
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I used my Stinky for 3 yrs as a xc bike. With the right components you can get the weight around 28 to 30lbs. Throw on a good rear shock and it works great and can still handle the biger hits.


  12. #12
    you cant handle bars.
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    191
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by MasterSezFaster
    Depends on what year the frame is. Anything up to 2002 will work better with a single crown fork between 105mm and 125mm of travel (you could use a 130mm travel fork with out to much change in the handling).


    really thats funny, i have a 02 stinky primo that im running a 02 monster t on and i love it. a 100 mm single crown on a stinky p? come on dude, thats a joke.

  13. #13
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Primo was 1in more travel. I think he is talking standard stinky.

  14. #14
    UareFASTjustNOTfastENOUGH MasterSezFaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Amongst the hills in So.Cal.
    My Bikes
    Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Bianchi C2C 928
    Posts
    391
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by handlebarsfsr
    really thats funny, i have a 02 stinky primo that im running a 02 monster t on and i love it. a 100 mm single crown on a stinky p? come on dude, thats a joke.

    The geometry of the Stinky was not designed for long travel. Key word, designed. That does not mean it wont work or hold up to the forces put on it. I ran a '99 Stinky with a 200mm fork as well but it does handle differently then it would if you were to use a fork it was designed for.


  15. #15
    KGB Style dirtyamerican's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    158
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I may be a noob here but if you don't even know what a double crown fork is then maybe it's time to do some research! Stinkys are great fr/trail bikes. They are light and pedal efficiently, relatively speaking. You don't HAVE to have a double crown fork on the Stinky (that's with the tubes that go all the way up to the bars. What's important is having the adequate amount of travel. Probably somewhere around 5" or above would make the Stinky angles/geometry maximized. You can get single crown forks with up to 8" of travel now if you have to have a single crown for x ups and stuff. You will have a great time on that Stinky once you get it built up right and ride it for the appropriate uses. Have fun!

  16. #16
    Digs technical steeps
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deano
    I would be greatful if someone could give me some advice. I am thinking about buying a Kona Stinky frame, but it comes without forks - this wouldnt normally be a problem, and i will put my Rock Shox onto the frame, but the Stinky normally has the forks that come right up to the handle bars. Sorry if that doesnt make much sense, but i am sure you will know what i am trying to say. Will my forks go onto the frame, or will they just go on, but not work properly?
    Any help would be great.

    Thanks
    What year is the frame? Per the Kona website (www.konaworld.com) the 2005 Stinky is designed as a FR bike and comes in between 38 lbs and 44 lbs as spec'd as a fully built bike by Kona. That is not exactly my idea of the typical XC bike (although I think the Stinky is a nice FR bike). Looking at how Kona spec'd the bike should be a good indicator of how you might build it up re:fork, etc. There are many options, of course.

    What type of riding do you plan to do?
    'My other bike is a bike.'

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •