"Science proves MtnBiking more harmful then hiking."
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Highlands, Ca.
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
"Science proves MtnBiking more harmful then hiking."
https://www.culturechange.org/mountai...ng_impacts.htm
I'm sure this very same article has already been posted and discussed here, and, again.... I'll get my ass chewed off for not researching past posts, But I did!! And couldnt find anything "much" on "The Impact Mtn Biking Has On The Environment.
But this article made me feel kinda guilty while reading it. Granted I haven't finished it yet but I'm afraid our Mtn Biking in the hills days are limited. Good thing my family owns 25 acres of Montana wilderness. (Sorry, hiking not allowed.) What irks me though is that they, them, the ones who want to rid the hills of mtn biking accuse me, and the rest of us that we arn't envronmentalist but just use the wilderness for a playground. Thats not true, right? We all love the environment, I think.
I'm sure this very same article has already been posted and discussed here, and, again.... I'll get my ass chewed off for not researching past posts, But I did!! And couldnt find anything "much" on "The Impact Mtn Biking Has On The Environment.
But this article made me feel kinda guilty while reading it. Granted I haven't finished it yet but I'm afraid our Mtn Biking in the hills days are limited. Good thing my family owns 25 acres of Montana wilderness. (Sorry, hiking not allowed.) What irks me though is that they, them, the ones who want to rid the hills of mtn biking accuse me, and the rest of us that we arn't envronmentalist but just use the wilderness for a playground. Thats not true, right? We all love the environment, I think.
#2
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
There are more studies saying the opposite to. In reality every time we encroach on the environment we cause damage.
My mountains aren't going to be limited. The trails are built correctly and re-enforced. Things will remain here for quite some time. Poor trail building is the biggest bane of the mountain biker.
My mountains aren't going to be limited. The trails are built correctly and re-enforced. Things will remain here for quite some time. Poor trail building is the biggest bane of the mountain biker.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Southern Maine
Posts: 8,938
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12172 Post(s)
Liked 1,481 Times
in
1,094 Posts
Having done both, I agree with the article.
But let's get down to business here. A well maintained trail
won't turn into a small disaster. This is all about caring for what you use. Whether you hike or bike, if the trails you use are not maintained, they will degrade dramatically.
But let's get down to business here. A well maintained trail
won't turn into a small disaster. This is all about caring for what you use. Whether you hike or bike, if the trails you use are not maintained, they will degrade dramatically.
#4
Still kicking.
I'd take the article with a grain of salt. The article is written by Vandeman afterall, if he had it his way, life in general would be pushed all the way back to the Amoebic Era.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#6
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Looks like hes been given'er for a while. Checkout the kook in may 1998
https://www.lart.com/auk/whiners.html
https://www.lart.com/auk/whiners.html
#7
Footballus vita est
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,118
Bikes: Trek 4500, Kona Dawg
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
He's just another self-righteous nutjob looking for something to complain about. So what if mountain biking causes a little erosion, so do his precious bears he mentions in the first sentence. Heck, they even eat his precious plants and animals. Besides, that little bit of erosion is nothing compared to an 8-lane highway. Conservation is a good cause, but you can only take it so far. While any trail user should take care not to abuse it so it remains available for others, a little wear and tear is to be expected.
At first I figured this was another hiker who had a bad encounter with a rude mountain biker, but reading his article, it sounds to me like he'll take the same stance against anyone who doesn't share his environmental views.
Wow. Deep insight on that one doc.
At first I figured this was another hiker who had a bad encounter with a rude mountain biker, but reading his article, it sounds to me like he'll take the same stance against anyone who doesn't share his environmental views.
Originally Posted by nutjob guy from linked article
Having been a transportation activist for eight years (working on stopping highway construction), and having a favorable view of my fellow bicyclists as environmentalists, I turned to them to help me campaign to keep bicycles out of natural areas. Was I ever surprised! I discovered that many bicyclists (e.g. many mountain bikers) aren't environmentalists at all, but are simply people who like to bicycle
__________________
"The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad
"The internet is a place where absolutely nothing happens. You need to take advantage of that." ~ Strong Bad
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Spain, although I'm Hungarian
Posts: 1,855
Bikes: Check signature
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also, because many mountain bikers are after thrills and speed, their tires cut into the ground. Slamming on the brakes after zooming downhill, sliding around sharp corners, and digging in to go uphill: I see the results of this behavior weekly. …
#9
Retro-nerd
It's all a bunch of hooey.
#10
THIS BIKE'S 4 U !!!!
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Western, NC .... (Pisgah, Bent Creek, DuPont)
Posts: 1,272
Bikes: HARO Xtreme X2, K2 Lithium 3.0, K2 Beast, K2 Flyin' Monkey, DiamondBack Accent EX, DiamondBack Axis TR
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
That Dude looks like Hitler after a shave....
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: FoCo, Colorado
Posts: 215
Bikes: Ridley Helium, 83/84 Shogun 600, ~85 Peugeot (PGN 10?), Masi Vincere Premio, Miyata 600GT, Yeti 575
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
They say the same thing about all hunters, all campers, all rafters/kayakers, all anyone that does anything outside... We all know that there are "bad apples" that do stupid things and give everyone else a bad name, but really, the people that write these articles or complaining, in my experience, don't even utilize the outdoors much. They sit in their houses, or office in some giant skyscraper and ***** about us having fun oustise.
Obviously people with those sentiments are extreme and cannot be helped to anywhere near this side of logic or sanity, but where do they think that there houses and skyscrapers come from? I assure everyone here that they don't grow like mushrooms or something. Where every house and office building sits, used to be where Bambi , streams ran clear, and all of that. So, I for one will stop doing everything I do that is "destroying, irreprably harming, etc..." the environment, [I]when[/I, we can burn down the cities, let nature do 'er thing, and then ride there.
Oh yeah, as a scientist, I hate it when dumba$$es use "science" to back up their, otherwise unprovable claim, when in fact, no SCIENCE was actually used. People are always telling me, "well science shows..." and I just respond "really, show me..." they can't because there is no scientific data to show for such absurd accusations. <step off of soapbox>
cheers.
Obviously people with those sentiments are extreme and cannot be helped to anywhere near this side of logic or sanity, but where do they think that there houses and skyscrapers come from? I assure everyone here that they don't grow like mushrooms or something. Where every house and office building sits, used to be where Bambi , streams ran clear, and all of that. So, I for one will stop doing everything I do that is "destroying, irreprably harming, etc..." the environment, [I]when[/I, we can burn down the cities, let nature do 'er thing, and then ride there.
Oh yeah, as a scientist, I hate it when dumba$$es use "science" to back up their, otherwise unprovable claim, when in fact, no SCIENCE was actually used. People are always telling me, "well science shows..." and I just respond "really, show me..." they can't because there is no scientific data to show for such absurd accusations. <step off of soapbox>
cheers.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Regina, SK, CA
Posts: 945
Bikes: 2002 Rocky HT
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The guy is definately a nut, I used to read Culture Change when I was researching transportation alternatives. However, after they posted this drivel I never went back.
Related to erosion though, one thing that realllly bugs me is people who drag their back wheels on descents. "Skid in your shorts, not on the trail" to borrow a line from Kona.
Related to erosion though, one thing that realllly bugs me is people who drag their back wheels on descents. "Skid in your shorts, not on the trail" to borrow a line from Kona.
#13
contrarian
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CO Springs
Posts: 2,848
Bikes: 80's ross road bike/commuter, 80's team miyata, 90's haro mtb xtracycle conversion, koga mitaya world traveler
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Unfortunately, much of the public cannot play by the rules. I see many areas around me destroyed by late nite partiers. Trash and broken glass everywhere.
__________________
Higher ground for the apocalypse!
Higher ground for the apocalypse!
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 148
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Humans, are animals. And like all animals we belong outside. The only reason there is an inside is because at one point we needed a break from the ouside. Then we spent so much time inside that going outside seemed wrong.
Our ancesters shaped everything around them because as a species that is what we do.
The idea that riding through the woods on bikes is doing any measurably comparable damage to this planet is beyond logical reasoning. We have crossed this planed with concrete roads, but a dirt path 2 feet wide is somehow going to topple mother nature?
Our ancesters shaped everything around them because as a species that is what we do.
The idea that riding through the woods on bikes is doing any measurably comparable damage to this planet is beyond logical reasoning. We have crossed this planed with concrete roads, but a dirt path 2 feet wide is somehow going to topple mother nature?
#15
Middle-ground Communist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Isle of Wight - UK
Posts: 484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Not wanting blow my own trumpet, but I have an Honours Degree in Environmental Science (as well as a Masters in computing ) - part of the course looked at things like errosion and mans inpact on the soils. MTBs' do damage the lanscape, just as every other user does. Bikes are no more worse than hikers.
The ramblers association here in the UK has a motto "Leave only footprints", yet its those thousands of foot steps that do much of the damage. If you really want to save the country side, ban the hikers, but of course most hikers are generally middle-class white folk (here in the UK) who are more likely to be able to aply political pressure. I've had more than one argument out on a trail with some middleage know-it-all, only to bring them down to size with the facts.
Its an argument that'll go on and on - at least here in the UK the National Parks Authority and the Forestry commision are working to protect the country side with out limiting peoples acess - whether they be on foot or bike, but then the advantage we have is the "Right to Roam" legislation that protects the many paths and tracks - my Island, which is 7 miles by 13 has over 300 miles of public paths and tracks. Where as I'm half quessing that in the US most land is privatly owned and acess limited?
The ramblers association here in the UK has a motto "Leave only footprints", yet its those thousands of foot steps that do much of the damage. If you really want to save the country side, ban the hikers, but of course most hikers are generally middle-class white folk (here in the UK) who are more likely to be able to aply political pressure. I've had more than one argument out on a trail with some middleage know-it-all, only to bring them down to size with the facts.
Its an argument that'll go on and on - at least here in the UK the National Parks Authority and the Forestry commision are working to protect the country side with out limiting peoples acess - whether they be on foot or bike, but then the advantage we have is the "Right to Roam" legislation that protects the many paths and tracks - my Island, which is 7 miles by 13 has over 300 miles of public paths and tracks. Where as I'm half quessing that in the US most land is privatly owned and acess limited?
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Highlands, Ca.
Posts: 326
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Well you guys made some excellent points so I'm not gonna worry about it. What I need to worry about is all the great bike and hiking trails that are dissappearing in my area and being replaced with multi-million dollar homes and golf courses.
#17
SNIKT!
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Home for wayward mutants
Posts: 1,560
Bikes: '06 Kona Dawg Deluxe/'06 Cannondale F400(frame)/'98 Cannondale SuperV1000
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dang
Well you guys made some excellent points so I'm not gonna worry about it. What I need to worry about is all the great bike and hiking trails that are dissappearing in my area and being replaced with multi-million dollar homes and golf courses.
He lost any respect from me the second I read that he'd never ridden a MTB. I'll tell ya what, why don't you bring your dumb ass out to the local horse trail and see how lightly they tread? Oh, and don't forget the deer, turkey, buzzards, raccoons, opossums, foxes, etc, etc....
__________________
I like pie!
"The bright flicker of our television screens is the stolen incandescence of a thousand young minds." - Theodore W. Gray
"you taught us to fish while so many others were handing out tuna sandwiches" - Ziggurat
I like pie!
"The bright flicker of our television screens is the stolen incandescence of a thousand young minds." - Theodore W. Gray
"you taught us to fish while so many others were handing out tuna sandwiches" - Ziggurat
#18
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Trail users who actually give a damn ride them with respect. They don't skid, they build (with approval from land management) sustainable trails that have minimal impact on the surrounding terrain / ecosystem, most of them perform trail maintenance as a way of saying "thanks for having such a great trail". MTB'ers as a whole get lumped into a pretty ******* catagory because of a small percentage of "bikers" who are jackasses. It's unfair, and the only way we can defend ourselves is to make our voices heard by joining local and national advocacy groups .
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: colonial heights Va
Posts: 1,200
Bikes: Devinci Guzzler, 04 Canadian version
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
where are all them tree huggers when they want to take that "wilderness area" and turn it into a neighborhood or mall? Ill tell ya where . with their real estate agent trying to get first dibs on the best lots, or at the car dealer buying a new peice of construction equipment sized SUV to drive to the new mall, thats where. most and I say most mountain bikers spend at least 1/4 of their free time working on trails and not just riding them or being involved in some form or fashion in trail advocacy
#20
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by iamthetas
where are all them tree huggers when they want to take that "wilderness area" and turn it into a neighborhood or mall? Ill tell ya where . with their real estate agent trying to get first dibs on the best lots, or at the car dealer buying a new peice of construction equipment sized SUV to drive to the new mall, thats where.
#21
Vanned.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,244
Bikes: 2006 Motobecane Le Champ SL, 2006 Mercier Kilo TT, 2004 Gary Fisher Tassajara
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I don't know if you guys know the history behind this article, but Mike Vandeman was (maybe still is) a regular at the alt.mountain-bike newsgroup. He harrasses all the off-roaders there, and is a plain nuissance to the community there.
He's got a personal mission to get all bikes off trails, and won't let up till he wins. His research is obviously biased.
He's got a personal mission to get all bikes off trails, and won't let up till he wins. His research is obviously biased.
#22
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by worker4youth
I don't know if you guys know the history behind this article, but Mike Vandeman was (maybe still is) a regular at the alt.mountain-bike newsgroup. He harrasses all the off-roaders there, and is a plain nuissance to the community there.
He's got a personal mission to get all bikes off trails, and won't let up till he wins. His research is obviously biased.
He's got a personal mission to get all bikes off trails, and won't let up till he wins. His research is obviously biased.
#23
Still kicking.
Originally Posted by Raiyn
I know perfectly well who this ****stain is. If memory serves he was a member here too until he crossed the line one too many times and got himself banned.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,124
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
While I agree with the general quote, this guy is an asshat.
Some of his articles are so skewed it's like reading trail propaganda.
Some of his articles are so skewed it's like reading trail propaganda.
#25
close to 2000
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 1,856
Bikes: 05 Brodie Diablo - 06 Norco 416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
One word: dumbf***. That guy needs to get a life instead of whining.