Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-14-05, 04:36 PM   #1
turkish
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Colorado
Bikes:
Posts: 21
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Kona vs. Specialized

So I went to my LBS again today (I'm certain they're sick of seeing me and letting me ride during my lunch hour). I was looking at an 06 RH comp w/ disc and now I am looking at an 05 Stumpy w/o disc. There is a $300 diff in price ($850 vs $1150) and to me the frame on the SJ felt a lot lighter.

To the point...Since I was now confused by the Speacialized situation, I decided to check out the Kona Caldera (which my LBS doesn't sell), and I was wondering which Kona has a frame comparable to the '05 SJ (which is M4 I think. Which means nada to me, but felt real light). The reason I ask, is it seems that a Kona in the same price range as a Specialized is coming equiped w/ better compents (XT vs LX on RD, LX vs Deore on shifters).

Just something I was wondering and figured some of y'all may know.

Thx
turkish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-05, 01:42 AM   #2
nathank
cycle-powered
 
nathank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Munich Germany (formerly Portland OR, Texas)
Bikes: '02 Specialized FSR, '03 RM Slayer, '99 Raleigh R700, '97 Norco hartail, '89 Stumpjumper
Posts: 1,848
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
not my area of expertese, but i think the Kona Kikapu is the XC full suspension bike comparable to the Stumpjumper.

in general the Specialized frames are much lighter as Kona's are built for STRENGTH as opposed to lightweight
nathank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-05, 06:07 AM   #3
Scooby Snax
Guest
 
Bikes:
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
The Kona's frame is going to be a titch heavier, more trail oriented, where the Specialized will be a XC race geometry.
On the surface, I think that the Specialized is a better spec'd bike. Fox RL fork, compared to a marzocchi MXR, but I do like the Kona's Curb Appeal.
The stumpy's frame is the same across the whole range until you get to an S-Works.
I'd say that the Specialized off the line may be a better buy, but it does come down to what you want, which feels better. We cant decide that for you, that's your job.
Just remember, John Tomac won world cup races on a Raleigh, He probobly would have done it on a Huffy as well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-05, 08:57 AM   #4
va_cyclist
Senior Member
 
va_cyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ashland, VA
Bikes:
Posts: 1,345
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Just a comment on LBS getting sick of you. I hope that's not the case. The more they let you ride, the more they build loyalty in you as a customer, and get you closer to that perfect bike, which should guarantee a sale for them. Letting you ride is a good move, and I hope they realize it.
va_cyclist is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 PM.