Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Senior Member Sincitycycler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
    My Bikes
    2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
    Posts
    3,219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Newbie: What are the limitations of buying a hardtail MTB?

    I would just do trail riding and some nice climbs..no radicial jumps off of 4 foot ledges or anything.

    Are hardtails faster than dual supsension since you have less bouncing arouind? Thanks
    "How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"

  2. #2
    Elite Rep
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne - Australia
    Posts
    2,097
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would say so. Although I guess you would go faster over say rocks on an FS then on a hard tail because a full suspenion bike would absorb the bumps. On trails hard tails would be faster because they are usually lighter and going up hills a hardtail would be easier to push then an FS.

  3. #3
    SNIKT! Karldar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Home for wayward mutants
    My Bikes
    '06 Kona Dawg Deluxe/'06 Cannondale F400(frame)/'98 Cannondale SuperV1000
    Posts
    1,560
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't really think of any limitations other than maybe fatigue(not the frame, but the rider) from soaking up impacts. It's still mostly the rider that determines speed. I've know rigid riders who could outride our whole group thanks to experience/technique. A HT should be fine for your type of riding. You can usually get a nicely spec'd HT for less than a similarly outfitted FS. HT's are generally faster uphill, while FS is faster downhill, but that depends on the rider and suspension setup. Oh, and for what it's worth, I've taken my XC HT off of 4-5 foot jumps with no problems if you ever want to get into that aspect of it.
    I like pie!
    "The bright flicker of our television screens is the stolen incandescence of a thousand young minds." - Theodore W. Gray
    "you taught us to fish while so many others were handing out tuna sandwiches" - Ziggurat

  4. #4
    Custom User never's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    T0L0K0
    Posts
    3,739
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you are new to mountain biking, most would suggest a hardtail because it will allow/force you to improve your skills rather than just relying on the FS bike to plow over everything.

  5. #5
    DMN
    DMN is offline
    Middle-ground Communist DMN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Isle of Wight - UK
    Posts
    484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by never
    If you are new to mountain biking, most would suggest a hardtail because it will allow/force you to improve your skills rather than just relying on the FS bike to plow over everything.
    Agreed. Buying a hardtail will make you a better rider in the long run.
    The views expressed above are badly thought out and hastley typed. Any spelling or gramatical mistakes, are, their to annoy.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Woods, CT
    My Bikes
    03' Hardrock Pro
    Posts
    31
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hardtails offer more control, but like Karldarl said it does cause fatigue on the rider. but if you have a nice enough fork it shouldnt be too bad. so no there arnt too many limitations for hardtails, unless that is you feel like launching off of 8 foot jumps.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The downsides to full suspension are, they are sluggish. The dual suspension pivots and absorbs energy, making you go slower for a larger amount of effort. Unless your doing really bumpy downhill riding, fs bikes aren't the best way.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Sincitycycler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    "Gosh honey, you pass more like Tony Rominger..."
    My Bikes
    2005 Scott CR1 Pro - 1992 Panasonix Fixed Conversion 60tx20t
    Posts
    3,219
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoF3ar
    The downsides to full suspension are, they are sluggish. The dual suspension pivots and absorbs energy, making you go slower for a larger amount of effort. Unless your doing really bumpy downhill riding, fs bikes aren't the best way.
    Thanks for the good info!
    "How did all those 'Keep Off the Grass' signs get there?"

  9. #9
    DMN
    DMN is offline
    Middle-ground Communist DMN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Isle of Wight - UK
    Posts
    484
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoF3ar
    The downsides to full suspension are, they are sluggish. The dual suspension pivots and absorbs energy, making you go slower for a larger amount of effort. Unless your doing really bumpy downhill riding, fs bikes aren't the best way.

    Your not wrong. I've had my Giant AC for a month now and it takes a lot more effort to get it rolling than my old DJ bike did. I did a triathelon a few weeks back and the other guys in my team where on supper light XC bikes - they left me standing going up hill, but on the downs they couldn't keep up.
    The views expressed above are badly thought out and hastley typed. Any spelling or gramatical mistakes, are, their to annoy.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •