Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-07-02, 07:59 PM   #1
dirtbikedude
Gravity Is Yer Friend
Thread Starter
 
dirtbikedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Over the Hill" and going down fast in the 805.
Bikes: Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Kona Bear, Bianchi 928 Carbon/Chorus, C'Dale Rize4
Posts: 2,961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Why does...

Ok, I did my first drop over 5' 8". We actually measured it and it is 6' 1" from take off to landing (actual vertical drop). The question I pose is, why does it not look that big in the pic? Is it just the lighting or what? The picture makes me think that 10+ feet should be no prob. But when sitting on top of the drop it looks giant.
Slainte
dirtbikedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-02, 08:32 PM   #2
Dirtgrinder
Dances with Rocks
 
Dirtgrinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Jefferson City, MO
Bikes:
Posts: 1,441
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'd say it's the sloping ground that makes it look like less. If it was a completely vertical wall, it would look much bigger. Congrats on the drop.
__________________
If everything seems under control, you're just not going fast enough...

To become a registered member of BikeForums Click Here
Dirtgrinder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-02, 09:34 PM   #3
zlj75
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Manchester, MA
Bikes:
Posts: 135
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Pics are tough, you think you are a star, and then you see the picture...not to say you are not, that's a sick drop. It's happened to me plenty of times with ski pictures, you can be on a you fall you die line, but the picture makes it look like child's play.
Who knows? Maybe it is just meant for the mind's eye.
Singletrack Mind.
zlj75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-02, 10:08 PM   #4
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
Posts: 16,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Simple rule. Pics make peole look fat and drops look small.

Congrats on the drop. I am trying to get the nerver to pull a 5' drop. I am just concerned about my forks and frame. I would really hate to brake anything too expensive and my forks are CRAP!

That is sweet. Just curious speaking of drops, how do you measure a drop. From launch to connect or the vertical section?
Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-02, 05:29 AM   #5
pinerider
bici accumulatori
 
pinerider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hamilton, Ottawa, Maberly, Apsley, Ontario
Bikes: 1985 Nishiki International Touring Bike, 1992 Vitus 979 road bike, 1996 Bianchi Premio road bike, 2002 Thin Blue LIne CO2 mountain bike, 2007 Rocky Mountain Sherpa touring bike, 1964 CCM roadster, 1959 CCM Motorbike, 2002 KHS FXT mtb + more to fix!
Posts: 855
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I did a 5'9" drop last week, only it was all 5'9" of me dropping the bike and going over the bars on a steep descent that got steeper at the same spot it got rougher.
Pictures are always very poor at displaying vertical differences. I think it has something to do with the eyes and brain really relying on 3d viewing for distance and depth perception. Photos only give you 2d, I guess the brain chronically underestimates. Anytime I have to take pix at work to illustrate vertical stuff, I always make sure there is some kind of scale to go buy, usually a ruler or person to compare height to.
I think if the pic had been taken a half second earlier, there would have been more air under the bike and it would have looked more impressive. Lots of air underneath gives the impression of more vertical distance.
pinerider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-02, 08:23 AM   #6
MichaelW
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: England
Bikes:
Posts: 12,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 5 Post(s)
Get your photographer to lower his viewpoint. He should be lying on the ground for dropoff pics. Also, if you have a zoom, try taking a pic reallly close with a wideangle, or far away with a telephoto. Look in the magazines, and you will see that great biking pics fill the frame with the rider and bike, even chopping off the extremities.
Good sports pics are not easy to take, and modern cameras have all kind of delays for focusing etc, which make it difficult to grab the exact moment of action.
MichaelW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-02, 09:38 AM   #7
KleinMp99
New to bikeforýms.net
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Bikes:
Posts: 2,202
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Wow pictures suck. Are you launching off of the top part and landing on the bottom or launching off the dip after the top part? I could see how big launching off the top would be, but it looks like your dropping from the middle to the end, and it looks tiny.

Last edited by KleinMp99; 09-08-02 at 06:27 PM.
KleinMp99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-02, 06:41 PM   #8
dirtbikedude
Gravity Is Yer Friend
Thread Starter
 
dirtbikedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Over the Hill" and going down fast in the 805.
Bikes: Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Kona Bear, Bianchi 928 Carbon/Chorus, C'Dale Rize4
Posts: 2,961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Well, as I said, it is a 6'1" vertical drop and that was my original question, it does look small in the pic. Yes I am only going off the lower half. If you wanted to make it a step-down from the top drop you would have to be traveling very fast being that there is a 15 foot flat area between the two and the top one is only a 3 1/2 foot drop.
Slainte
dirtbikedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-02, 10:09 PM   #9
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
Posts: 16,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Compare the jump to you. The side wall looks to be about your height plus bike. You are a clydesdale rider so I asumme you break the 6' barrier. I can see how that drop is 6'. I think the tranny going partway up the drop is deceiving.
Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-08-02, 10:33 PM   #10
Joe Gardner
BikeForums Founder
 
Joe Gardner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Utah.
Bikes:
Posts: 4,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
You just need to learn to take better photos
Joe Gardner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-02, 06:52 AM   #11
WoodyUpstate
xc AND road
 
WoodyUpstate's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Bikes:
Posts: 503
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
1. You have nothing to aid perspective. A person standing alongside, or a bike leaning against the ledge to the right would give the viewer some sense of size. We can't tell how big the drop is, because we have no way to "measure it" in our mind.

2. Too early. The photo should be taken at its point of maximum drama. Your rear wheel looks like it's only 4 inches off the ground in the pic, so the view isn't too worried about you landing it. Next time wait until you've caught maximum air.

3. Change the angle. The pic is shot into the hill. Have the photographer come closer to the drop and shoot "with" you, not at you. The new viewpoint will give the viewer the sence of you launching into air instead of coming from the safety of earth.

4. How much air? From the takeoff point to the landing point you may have dropped 6'1", but never got over 2' off the ground. Same idea with ski jumpers - you know, in the olympics. They jump 300', or something, but much of the time they're only 15' off the ground. Like someone said, the sloping landing area isn't helping the photo's drama.

Congrats.
WoodyUpstate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-02, 08:09 AM   #12
sscyco
Fool O' crap
 
sscyco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: spokane
Bikes: Are faster than yours.
Posts: 1,230
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It is all about perspective - I have a pic of me dropping roughly 7 feet (I'll scan and post later) but it looks like less, I have another pic of me doing a 3.5-4 foot drop and it looks bigger than the 7 foot drop. Here's an old pic (I know, Ive posted it before) that looks like I'm jumping my kid, but he's about 12 feet behind my actual jumping line.
__________________
sscyco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-02, 10:56 AM   #13
mechBgon
Senior Member
 
mechBgon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Bikes:
Posts: 6,957
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The other thing to keep in mind is that, from YOUR perspective sitting on top of the bike, the landing is ten or eleven feet down (6 feet of drop, plus your eyes are four or five feet off the ground at take-off). So naturally it looks all the more intense from the rider's perspective
mechBgon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-02, 08:30 PM   #14
dirtbikedude
Gravity Is Yer Friend
Thread Starter
 
dirtbikedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Over the Hill" and going down fast in the 805.
Bikes: Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Kona Bear, Bianchi 928 Carbon/Chorus, C'Dale Rize4
Posts: 2,961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the responses.
Hey Joe, That part you placed me on the pic is just under 7'. That is my next drop theis week.

I will also have my photographer (wife) try taking them from diff. angles.

Slainte
dirtbikedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-02, 09:35 PM   #15
Hawkphoto
Nikon Nemisis
 
Hawkphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bay Area, California
Bikes:
Posts: 244
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Its not the drop, its the photographer...

We make all sorts of decisions, from exposure and perspective, to angle and the exact moment. General rules for MTB photography! Get Closer!!! If you got balls, a wide angle lens and an extremely close vantage point will add the ultimate amount of drama to the shot and make you look like you're flying! If you must stay back, Use a long lens and get down low, in order to look up, frame the subject with the sky, not the ground, to give the illusion of AIR!

Have a pep talk with your friends next time and discuss your lines and where the best vantage points will be... anticipation is everything! Great shots rarely just happen, they are deliberately created from many variables.

Good Luck, and I can tell that it's a great drop, its just not that dynamic of an image!

Mike
Hawkphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.