Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    My Bikes
    IRO Model 19, Surly Crosscheck, 1989 Arnie Nashbar
    Posts
    1,084
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Fork and geometry question.

    I'm thinking about going from a 100 mm travel fork (Marzocchi EXR) to an 85 mm travel (Marzocchi MX Comp). Is this new fork effectively 15 mm shorter in total length or, is the overall lenght the same? Should I add 15 mm to the steerer tube length to maintain the same geometry?
    die trying

    everyone likes my shirt

  2. #2
    ÖöÖöÖöÖöÖö Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    You won't get the same geometry, the bike will be notably twitchier due to the loss of 15mm. As long as the steerer is the same length as the old one, the cockpit geometry should be the same.
    Quote Originally Posted by scrodzilla
    I'm going out on the town tonight and it won't be over until I snort a line of habanero seeds off the hood of a red Fiero.
    Words and Stuff.
    pedal room thingy

  3. #3
    Too Much Crazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Ventana El Comandante, Lynskey ridgeline, EWR OWB, GF HKEK, Gunnar Roadie, Spesh E5 S Works, Quintana Roo Kilo, Intense BMX Cruiser
    Posts
    3,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It would be imperceptibly shorter in my opinion.

    Leaving 15mm in additional steerer tube will not compensate for the lower axle to crown height of the reduced travel fork.

    you could add a spacers above the head tube if you wanted to maintain the exact handlebar position you had before.

    But adding spacer above the head tube will not change your axle to crown height as stated above.

    The front end of the frame will still be a bit lower and the headtube a bit steeper. Neither would be an issue from such a small change. It will make the bike ride slightly twitchier.

  4. #4
    Time for a change. stapfam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    6 miles inland from the coast of Sussex, in the South East of England
    My Bikes
    Dale MT2000. Bianchi FS920 Kona Explosif. Giant TCR C. Boreas Ignis. Pinarello Fp Uno.
    Posts
    19,915
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Take into consideration Sag when you put your weight on the bike. The actual loss of 15mm, will be less if the fork is set up to have minimum sag, and an 85 mm fork will naturally have less sag than a 100mm. So your 15mm will not be.

    Going the other way-- I went from 135 mm to 150mm, and did not even notice the difference. What I did notice though was the plushness of that extra 15mm. Going down to 85mm may give you a firmer but harsher ride.

  5. #5
    The Rabbi seely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Posts
    4,864
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm thinking the MX Comp is a significantly lower end fork than an EXR... correct me if I am wrong as I don't know Marzocchis real well.
    commuter turned bike mechanic turned commuter (also a Velocity USA employee, but this is my personal account)

  6. #6
    Senior Member duckliondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    San Diego
    My Bikes
    Cinelli Unica, BP Stealth, K2 Razorback, Steel Bianchi roadie, Bianchi Super GL, Specialized Stumpjumper, and 3 beach cruisers
    Posts
    428
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by seely
    I'm thinking the MX Comp is a significantly lower end fork than an EXR... correct me if I am wrong as I don't know Marzocchis real well.
    Yeah, you had it backwards, the MX Comp is higher end than the EXR. I have an MX Comp w/ ETA, the 120 mm version. It's an awesome fork! The MX series comes in lots of different sizes, why don't you just get the 105 mm version? I'd much rather be 5 mm higher than 15mm lower.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •