Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: sram or shimano

Voters
60. You may not vote on this poll
  • SRAM

    38 63.33%
  • SHIMANO

    22 36.67%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 48

Thread: SRAM or SHIMANO

  1. #1
    Senior Member zx108's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.J.
    Posts
    1,545
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    SRAM or SHIMANO

    which one do you like/ride.

    i noticed that specialized bikes are with sram now.

  2. #2
    Adios, Mofo J-McKech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SXSW central
    My Bikes
    Bianchi Brava, Surly Instigator FR
    Posts
    1,651
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I vote rohloff.
    I am Signature-less

  3. #3
    Ankles Suck! norcodirtjumper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Vermont
    My Bikes
    2005 Kona Stinky
    Posts
    482
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Whatevers on sale but reliable. As long as it works good, and its somewhat cheap, I dont care what goes on my bike as far as driveterrain. But, if i could choose without money being an issue, Id choose Shimano probaly.

  4. #4
    Senior Member valbowski1980's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Waterford/Trumbull, CT
    My Bikes
    Iron Horse Rogue / Mongoose ALD Pro / Fuji Sunfire
    Posts
    447
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have a Deore/LX mix on my current bike. I might give SRAM a shot next time around to see if I like it better.

  5. #5
    one less horse cryptid01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    East Jesus NY
    My Bikes
    are better than yours
    Posts
    5,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Shimano, because SRAM doesn't offer low normal derailleurs.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If SRAM wins the popular vote can Shimano still be named victorious due to an archaic voting system?
    Kneel before Zod,
    Impeach Bush!

  7. #7
    Custom User never's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    T0L0K0
    Posts
    3,739
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I voted SRAM because I am really happy with my recent X.9 upgrade but I don't have a problem with any of the Shimano stuff on the bike or the other two bikes. If there was an option for either, I would have picked that.

  8. #8
    biketilldeath snoopz666's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    now residing in kamloops
    My Bikes
    2005 Norco Aline:D
    Posts
    498
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    sram for sure. i had shimano and switched, ill never go back
    2005 norco aline

    trees: natures brakes(they work really well. although they kinda hurt)

  9. #9
    Newbie erhan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    708
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It's interesting... SRAM users are mostly the ones who switched from Shimano for some reason, including myself. But I don't know anyone who used SRAM first, and then switched to Shimano. Anybody?

  10. #10
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gastro
    Shimano, because SRAM doesn't offer low normal derailleurs.
    Thank [insert religious deity of choice here] !
    The only thing that should be "Rapid Rise" is yeast.

    I like my pre Rapid Rise LX and XT drivetrains, but I'll be going to SRAM for the next build

  11. #11
    Senior Member Matt Gaunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiyn
    Thank [insert religious deity of choice here] !
    The only thing that should be "Rapid Rise" is yeast.

    I like my pre Rapid Rise LX and XT drivetrains, but I'll be going to SRAM for the next build


    I found it hard to vote on this one fellas. I have SRAM Attack 8's on the very retro MTB and they are something else compared to Shimano's offerings of late which are double the price or more.

    However, I don't like the way SRAM mechs are nearly all plastic, sorry, "Composite", when I can have a shiny XT one which is clearly stronger and looks nicer for roughly the same price.

    Swings and roundabouts, hence I've got a mixture of the two.
    Matt
    2010 Kinesis Decade Convert2 Alloy fixie, Miche, Sora Pics soon...
    2008 Kinesis RC2 Scandium/Carbon Road, Ultegra, Ksyrium Elites Pics
    2007 Kinesis Pha5e Scandium hardtail, XT, Revelations, Rockets, M4s, Mavics Pics
    2005 Kinesis RC Scandium/Carbon Road, Ultegra, Ksyrium SLs Pics
    1996 Raleigh Max Steel, Deore XT, SRAM Attack shifters, homemade wheels Pics

  12. #12
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Gaunt
    :However, I don't like the way SRAM mechs are nearly all plastic, sorry, "Composite",
    One piece doesn't make it "all plastic" mate even if the X.0 uses a carbon pulley cage on it's short and medium models

  13. #13
    Senior Member Matt Gaunt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,230
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiyn
    One piece doesn't make it "all plastic" mate even if the X.0 uses a carbon pulley cage on it's short and medium models
    True. I wasn't referring to the latest ones to be fair, though. I don't have a problem with it per se, I just prefer the XT one. Sorry for offending anyone though
    Matt
    2010 Kinesis Decade Convert2 Alloy fixie, Miche, Sora Pics soon...
    2008 Kinesis RC2 Scandium/Carbon Road, Ultegra, Ksyrium Elites Pics
    2007 Kinesis Pha5e Scandium hardtail, XT, Revelations, Rockets, M4s, Mavics Pics
    2005 Kinesis RC Scandium/Carbon Road, Ultegra, Ksyrium SLs Pics
    1996 Raleigh Max Steel, Deore XT, SRAM Attack shifters, homemade wheels Pics

  14. #14
    Senior Member Brian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Between the mountains and the lake.
    My Bikes
    8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
    Posts
    16,745
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'n my less than humble opinion, current Shimano is just shyte. Their new LX-XTR stuff is fugly, and doesn't work as well as SRAM gear. Their low end stuff is huge, bulky, and cheap looking. SRAM seems to improve their products to make them better. Shimano just makes it different each year so that the same fools get sucked into "Upgrading". If Shimano still made their older XT 8 speed stuff, there would be no contest.

    I have seen the future, and it's not RR, it's 1:1.

  15. #15
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Gaunt
    True. I wasn't referring to the latest ones to be fair, though. I don't have a problem with it per se, I just prefer the XT one. Sorry for offending anyone though
    No harm no foul. I'm all about the facts, and just wanted the correct info out there.
    Quote Originally Posted by Expatriate
    If Shimano still made their older XT 8 speed stuff, there would be no contest.

    I have seen the future, and it's not RR, it's 1:1.
    I don't know I think my last gen M570 and M750 parts are rather nice looking

  16. #16
    Senior Member Brian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Between the mountains and the lake.
    My Bikes
    8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
    Posts
    16,745
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Raiyn
    I don't know I think my last gen M570 and M750 parts are rather nice looking
    The M750's are ok, but 8 speed performance is still better than 9. The only chain I ever broke was a 9 speed one. The M760/765 are revolting.

  17. #17
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Expatriate
    The M750's are ok, but 8 speed performance is still better than 9. The only chain I ever broke was a 9 speed one.
    I disagree. Also the only chain I ever broke was an 8 speed Shimano. 9 speed SRAM chains have never been an issue

  18. #18
    Senior Member Brian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Between the mountains and the lake.
    My Bikes
    8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
    Posts
    16,745
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Let me clarify. The only chain I ever broke was a SRAM 9 speed.

  19. #19
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,587
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    My vote goes to SRAM. Unless one day Shimano decides to go to 1:1 ratio SRAM will be my only choice as far as shifters and rear derailleurs go. I am still using Shimano front derailleurs and cassettes though, hopefully SRAM will eventually put out some light weight cassettes and front derailleurs so I will be able to go completely shimano free.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  20. #20
    Shreddin' heaven on his 20" the wonginator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    markham, ontario, canada aka chinatown north
    Posts
    1,151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    what's this rapid rise and 1:1 thing?

  21. #21
    Senior Member Brian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Between the mountains and the lake.
    My Bikes
    8 bikes - one for each day of the week!
    Posts
    16,745
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rapid Rise is Shimano's latest effort to get everyone to replace their drivetrain with something they haven't needed for the last 100 years or so.

    1:1 is the cable actuation of SRAM's better equipment. Your MTB will shift smoother between service intervals, and under poor conditions, far better than Shimano.

  22. #22
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,587
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    1:1 thing. SRAM uses 1:1 cable pull, Shimano uses 1:2 cable pull. This basicly means that SRAM needs the cable to be pulled twice as far to shift the gears, however this is not noticed when shifting. It also means that the cable has to be out of adjustment twice as much to start getting ghost shifting and other bad shifts. This means that you can go much longer between tune ups and enjoy many more hours of problem free shifting by using SRAM. It really is a great thing to be able to ride for months without having a mis-shift or a ghost shift.

    It's hard to believe that I was actually hesitant to switch over to SRAM. I just didn't see the reason to make the switch. I had grown accustomed to the problems I had been having with Shimano for years and just learned to live with them. When I built up my Truth I decided to go ahead and give SRAM a shot. Once I made the change I couldn't believe the difference. I built up my Enlightenment a couple of months later and I never even gave it a second thought, I immediately ordered SRAM for that bike too. It would have been much easier to just use the Shimano drivetrain I have setting on my shelf but I would honestly rather pay for SRAM then use Shimano for free.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  23. #23
    Shreddin' heaven on his 20" the wonginator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    markham, ontario, canada aka chinatown north
    Posts
    1,151
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Expatriate
    Rapid Rise is Shimano's latest effort to get everyone to replace their drivetrain with something they haven't needed for the last 100 years or so.

    1:1 is the cable actuation of SRAM's better equipment. Your MTB will shift smoother between service intervals, and under poor conditions, far better than Shimano.
    ok that explained nothing.

  24. #24
    To be continued Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller, 1977 Puch Pathfinder
    Posts
    19,070
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Option 3, non of the above.
    Strike like an eagle and sacrifice the dove.
    Words and Stuff.

  25. #25
    one less horse cryptid01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    East Jesus NY
    My Bikes
    are better than yours
    Posts
    5,596
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by revmonkey
    ok that explained nothing.
    Perhaps this will help:

    Rapid Rise is Shimano's term for a low normal derailleur. This means that the spring is the opposite of the derailleurs you're probably accustomed to, which pull the derailleur toward the smallest cog (highest gear) when cable tension is released. A RR derailleur pulls toward the spokes at rest (lowest gear normal is how I remember it). This means the triggers are also reversed, and pushing with your thumb takes you down the cassette into a higher gear. Pull with the index finger and the chain moves up the cogs into a lower gear. Less effort is required at the shifter with RR.

    I have ridden them both and from my experience, RR allows smoother shifting under pedal loads. Also from my experience, the people who don't like RR are either 1) bike mechanics who get frustrated when they can't use their normal routine for adjusting derailleurs or 2) stubborn people who are too inflexible to relearn their shifting process.

    Hope this helps.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •