Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Giant Vs. Trek

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Giant Vs. Trek

    Hi everyone i have a quick question. I recently started looking at purchasing a new bike for myself. I just need something basic for around town and an occational trail, but nothing too intense. I have narrowed it down to the Trek 820 or the Giant Boulder SE. They seem about the same to me except the Giant has a alum frame. The are about the same price. I previously owned a Giant Rincon that I bought about 12 years ago that my brother is still riding. I am just looking fo a little advice from someone who would know better than me since i have not purchased a bike in a long time. Thanks for your help.

    Pete

  2. #2
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,586
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Have you test rode both of them? If so which one feels better to you? If you haven't then I would suggest trying them both out, that is the only way to really make the right decision.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    5
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for your help. I have and I like both.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    59
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    well if you like them both and they are the same price why not go with the bike with the aluminum frame. im no expert but lighter is usually better

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    820? the bottom of the line steel fram hardtail from trek? I wouldn't suggest you buy that. Minimally get a 4500.

  6. #6
    Throw the stick!!!! LowCel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Charleston, WV
    My Bikes
    GMC Denali
    Posts
    17,586
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by petea
    Thanks for your help. I have and I like both.
    If that is the case my personal preference would be Giant. I just feel that for the money they make a better bike. There is nothing to back this up though, just opinion.
    I may be fat but I'm slow enough to make up for it.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    81
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    yeah if you are gona do anything techincal, do not get a Trek lower than a 4500, heck get a 6000 series if you dont want it to brake up.

  8. #8
    Senior Member Jameson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    335
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not familiar with the Giant but I did own an older 820. I beat the hell out of that thing and didn't really have any problems. I ended up taxing the shock and most drive train components with several hard years of use combined with MINIMAL up keep. I would however choose the Giant because that thing was a heavy mother. I remember hike-a-biking with it.....sucked.

  9. #9
    '05 NUEser EJ123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,374
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoF3ar
    820? the bottom of the line steel fram hardtail from trek? I wouldn't suggest you buy that. Minimally get a 4500.
    couldn't agree more

  10. #10
    Dismember harov3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Western Australia
    My Bikes
    Kona Kikapu/hoss deluxe mix, 1950's Malvern Star gent 28" turned into a stealth commuter with drums and a three speed.
    Posts
    695
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If your happy with both, then pick a colour? Nah! seriously, choose the one that felt best. personally I'd take the Giant, as LowCel said they tend to give more bike for the money and as Jameson said its going to be lighter.

  11. #11
    -- TREK RIDER -- Quadzone.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Sumwaresin, KY
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by xenochimera
    yeah if you are gona do anything techincal, do not get a Trek lower than a 4500, heck get a 6000 series if you dont want it to brake up.

    I do tons of technical stuff including jumps, ruff azz single tracks, etc, etc, with my 4300 so your statement is straight out of the BS bag...
    My drinking buddies have a racing problem !!!

  12. #12
    '05 NUEser EJ123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,374
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Quadzone.com
    I do tons of technical stuff including jumps, ruff azz single tracks, etc, etc, with my 4300 so your statement is straight out of the BS bag...
    Cool what year do you have?

  13. #13
    Banned.
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Home alone
    My Bikes
    Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
    Posts
    6,021
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Quadzone.com
    I do tons of technical stuff including jumps, ruff azz single tracks, etc, etc, with my 4300 so your statement is straight out of the BS bag...
    Trek uses the same frame from the 4300 clear up through the 4900. So really the difference between the 4300 and 4500 is just in components. "Better" derailleurs, cranks, hubs, wheels, fork, shifters, etc. but the exact same frame with different numbers on it.

    So let's be real. There is going to be very little handling difference between these bikes. I don't do a lot of "technical" stuff but i do ride a lot. I have two Trek 4300's that I ride nearly every day. I have over 7000 miles on one of them and 5000 miles on the other and adding more every day. Of course I have replaced worn out components and upgraded a few things but that is it.

  14. #14
    Proud To Be An American EXCALIBUR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    USA
    My Bikes
    2004 Giant Cypress SX 2006 Giant OCR 3
    Posts
    367
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I used to have a Giant Rincon. The Giant Boulder SE is just one model below. Go with the Giant. You will get a lot of bike for the money and an aluminum frame as well.
    EXCALIBUR
    2004 Giant Cypress SX 2006 Giant OCR 3

  15. #15
    THIS BIKE'S 4 U !!!! Killer B's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Western, NC .... (Pisgah, Bent Creek, DuPont)
    My Bikes
    HARO Xtreme X2, K2 Lithium 3.0, K2 Beast, K2 Flyin' Monkey, DiamondBack Accent EX, DiamondBack Axis TR
    Posts
    1,272
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'll NEVER own a Trek, even if I won one. I'd sell it (if I could )....

  16. #16
    CRG
    CRG is offline
    Roll Tide CRG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Montgomery, AL
    My Bikes
    06 Specialized Hardrock Pro Disc and 06 Felt F90
    Posts
    176
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Killer B
    I'll NEVER own a Trek, even if I won one. I'd sell it (if I could )....

    Same here, overpriced bicycle at its finest.
    2006 Specialized Hardrock Pro Disc
    2006 Felt F90

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •