Manitou Travis
#1
close to 2000
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ontario, canada
Posts: 1,856
Bikes: 05 Brodie Diablo - 06 Norco 416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Manitou Travis
Leave it to Manitou to make a 203mm single crown fork. Their 170mm forks were sketchy enough, but 203mm? I would think that this fork would have a high chance of snapping but I guess its been tested several times.
Manitou Travis
What are your thoughts on the Travis?
Manitou Travis
What are your thoughts on the Travis?
#3
one less horse
Not a whole lot of stanchion overlap in that fork, but you'd be running a lot of sag, so it cancels out somewhat.
#7
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Still gonna feel like poop. Its esentially the spv valving turned upside down. So instead of the stiffness at the top, it is at the bottom. Very plush in the beginning of the travel and very inconsistent and crappy feeling at the bottom
#8
Still kicking.
I just can't see the purpose of an 8" sc, let alone a 7" sc.
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#11
Wood Licker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Posts: 16,966
Bikes: Trek Fuel EX 8 27.5 +, 2002 Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 23 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
the 888 and 66 are using brand new cartridges. Which actually work better than the old hsvc. Regardless, why do something innovative when other companies can't even compare valving on other forks are just now catching up to the quality of marz forks from 1999 and the first sets of z1's. Excluding possibly fox who had decent valving from the start.
#12
one less horse
Originally Posted by seely
I haven't seen Marzocchi do anything even remotely new or innovative in 5 years.
I have blown up three of three Manitous, zero of three Marzocchis.
#13
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
I think ETA and TST are both poor attempts at innovation.
And I quote:
"This is our very own on-the-fly compression dampening adjustment. Select between 5 modes depending on where you’re at on your favorite trail. from climbing to descending, it’s as simple as toggling the switch to fine tune your fork as you ride."
Terralogic (especially the new version) and SPV Evolve do the same thing, automatically, and about 10x better because they differentiate between rider input and ground input. This is just adjustable compression--thats it. Nothing new.
ETA? Most of the forks I have seen with ETA, it hasn't worked well/right, and seems rather inconvenient to me compared to just having a real lockout. It just seems far too gimmicky with the only real benefit being a lower H/A, which is stupid on an XC bike that already has a 70.5-72 deg. H/A. For downhill/freeride bikes, I don't really know anyone that actually uses an ETA setup so I won't comment on its usefulness there, though I still would rather have a lockout I would think.
Marzocchi's quality hasn't been all that impressive to me in the past 2 years, and many of their forks seem to have gone "stale" at the sake of innovation in their big hit freeride series. Even there, we still see the heaviest forks on the market with systems that work great, but haven't changed much (if at all) since around 1999.
To be fair, I DID just put a 2002 Marzocchi MXR on my P.1, because I loved the fork so much on my Cindercone, but I figured why buy a new Marz when the quality has suffered and nothing has changed since then?
And I quote:
"This is our very own on-the-fly compression dampening adjustment. Select between 5 modes depending on where you’re at on your favorite trail. from climbing to descending, it’s as simple as toggling the switch to fine tune your fork as you ride."
Terralogic (especially the new version) and SPV Evolve do the same thing, automatically, and about 10x better because they differentiate between rider input and ground input. This is just adjustable compression--thats it. Nothing new.
ETA? Most of the forks I have seen with ETA, it hasn't worked well/right, and seems rather inconvenient to me compared to just having a real lockout. It just seems far too gimmicky with the only real benefit being a lower H/A, which is stupid on an XC bike that already has a 70.5-72 deg. H/A. For downhill/freeride bikes, I don't really know anyone that actually uses an ETA setup so I won't comment on its usefulness there, though I still would rather have a lockout I would think.
Marzocchi's quality hasn't been all that impressive to me in the past 2 years, and many of their forks seem to have gone "stale" at the sake of innovation in their big hit freeride series. Even there, we still see the heaviest forks on the market with systems that work great, but haven't changed much (if at all) since around 1999.
To be fair, I DID just put a 2002 Marzocchi MXR on my P.1, because I loved the fork so much on my Cindercone, but I figured why buy a new Marz when the quality has suffered and nothing has changed since then?
#14
one less horse
I have an ETA fork and the more I use that feature, the more I like it. To each their own, I guess.
However, I will take you up on your assertion that they havent done anything "remotely innovative," followed up by your statement that "many of their forks seem to have gone "stale" at the sake of innovation in their big hit freeride series." Since this thread was started in reference to an 8" freeride fork, I kinda figured that's what we were talking about.
And the difference between my '03 Z1 FR and my '05 66 (both forks designed to target similar markets and riding styles) is remarkable, both in the quality of damping and in the overall structural stiffness of the fork.
However, I will take you up on your assertion that they havent done anything "remotely innovative," followed up by your statement that "many of their forks seem to have gone "stale" at the sake of innovation in their big hit freeride series." Since this thread was started in reference to an 8" freeride fork, I kinda figured that's what we were talking about.
And the difference between my '03 Z1 FR and my '05 66 (both forks designed to target similar markets and riding styles) is remarkable, both in the quality of damping and in the overall structural stiffness of the fork.
#15
I drink your MILKSHAKE
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Posts: 15,061
Bikes: 2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by madbiker555
Leave it to Manitou to make a 203mm single crown fork. Their 170mm forks were sketchy enough, but 203mm? I would think that this fork would have a high chance of snapping but I guess its been tested several times.
Manitou Travis
[IMGdisabled]https://www.bonthronebikes.co.uk/img/250/511/511338.jpg[/IMG]
What are your thoughts on the Travis?
Manitou Travis
[IMGdisabled]https://www.bonthronebikes.co.uk/img/250/511/511338.jpg[/IMG]
What are your thoughts on the Travis?
#16
Ride bike or bike ride?
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 1,447
Bikes: MongoosePro DH, Dart custom road bike, .243 Racing FR street bike
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I reckon she should hold up fine. So what exactly is this intrinsic damping and how does it work?
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
How can you say that the other forks were sketchy i have ridden a pro-valved dorado and it was the smothest fork ive ever ridden. The only downfall to it was it was flexy. But ive come to learn its give/take with forks.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach, California
Posts: 594
Bikes: 2005 Specialized hardrock pro... pike426, e.13 drs, fsa gap crank, formula k24's, and some more/2006 Scattante R-660 easton circuit wheels.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i dont really know, a single crown, 203mm travel fork seems a bit too much
#20
Just Ride
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Posts: 1,343
Bikes: 2005 Giant Yukon with the works.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Interesting fork... I wonder how it holds up.... I also wonder if it is just as weak as the Manitou Kingpin. I've never seen a 203mm sc before.
#21
The Rabbi
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 5,123
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 16 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times
in
3 Posts
Originally Posted by gastro
And the difference between my '03 Z1 FR and my '05 66 (both forks designed to target similar markets and riding styles) is remarkable, both in the quality of damping and in the overall structural stiffness of the fork.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 245
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
This isnt a cheapo fork like the stance lineup, i dont see the issue with being 203mm it is a 1.5 steerer only fork. The extra strength from the 1.5 will be more then enough to handle whatever you could throw at it. The way i see it is it will be awesome to see barspins/x-ups off drops