Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-11-05, 10:12 PM   #1
mx_599
Lost in the Black Hills
Thread Starter
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
lay back seat post

i am thinking about getting a thomson post and was wondering , before i spend the money, is a layback post just for taller people for the most part? i did a search on here and seeley said there is no more offset...this poster seemed pretty adamant about that.

so than what is the purpose? i will mainly be doing XC, maybe some aggressive XC, and just putzin' around too.

i am short...about 5'4".

also, do you guys think it is a waste to buy the masterpiece thomson that is quite a bit more??

thanks for advice
brian
mx_599 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-05, 05:47 AM   #2
shane45
Ouch!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It's all about finding the perfect fit and balance, and the best sizing of the "magic triangle". The magic triangle as I call it, is the 3 contact points on your bike - the saddle, the handlebars, and the pedals. Once you get the dimmensions of that triangle dialed in, you will own the most efficient and comfortable bike in the world.

I'm 6' 2", and I needed to put a setback post on one of my 'Hoppers. I could have put a longer stem on, but that had me too far over the front wheel, and too much weight on my hands. I also could not move my saddle back far enough with a straight post. So my option was to go with a setback post, which did the trick nicely.

Here's a pic of my 21" frame that I use for aggressive XC. The setback post gives me a bit more cockpit room as well. I also ride 23" frames for XC racing, and do not require a setback post on that frame, as the larger frame allows just that much more cockpit space.

Oh, and it's never a waste to buy Thomson.


Last edited by shane45; 11-12-05 at 05:53 AM.
shane45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-05, 06:29 AM   #3
dirtbikedude
Gravity Is Yer Friend
 
dirtbikedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Over the Hill" and going down fast in the 805.
Bikes: Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Kona Bear, Bianchi 928 Carbon/Chorus, C'Dale Rize4
Posts: 2,961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
To sum up what shane45 said, the answer to your question is yes and no It's about the fit, not necessarily how tall you are. Your second question, yeha a Thompson is worth it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by shane45
...Here's a pic of my 21" frame that I use for aggressive XC...

Aggressive XC? I do not think so. Where is all the scratches and dirt on that rig. You pu***footin' around on that thing? It is way to clean

DBD
dirtbikedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-05, 06:39 AM   #4
shane45
Ouch!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtbikedude
Aggressive XC? I do not think so. Where is all the scratches and dirt on that rig. You pu***footin' around on that thing? It is way to clean

That pic is when I just completed the frame-up build. It doesn't look quite so pretty now!!!!
shane45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-05, 10:07 AM   #5
mx_599
Lost in the Black Hills
Thread Starter
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
thanks guys, but i eant the expensive thomson vs the cheap thompson. elite vs masterpiece....big price difference.

i guess your paying for weight savings but i am thinking that the elite version is just fine
mx_599 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-05, 08:54 AM   #6
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
I hope you all realize the Thompson setback is the EXACT same setback as the stock post on 99% of bikes, because the stock posts all have offset clamps and the Thompson has a zero offset clamp. All you can do at best is maintain stock geometry with a Thompson.
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-05, 09:09 AM   #7
shane45
Ouch!!!
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canada
Bikes:
Posts: 453
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely
All you can do at best is maintain stock geometry with a Thompson.

Uhhhhhhh...........no.

You don't think I measured some geometries before I went ahead and spent money on a Thomson setback?

I have a ton of spare straight posts and none of them gave me the seating postion I desired on the specific frame pictured above. Of course, if "close enough" is acceptable to you, then I agree - don't spend your money on a setback stick because 1/2" one way or the other won't bother guys like you. I however, like my bike to be as perfectly comfortable and efficient as I can make it.

Last edited by shane45; 11-13-05 at 09:42 AM.
shane45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-05, 10:09 AM   #8
cryptid01
one less horse
 
cryptid01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: East Jesus NY
Bikes: are better than yours
Posts: 5,600
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely
I hope you all realize the Thompson setback is the EXACT same setback as the stock post on 99% of bikes, because the stock posts all have offset clamps and the Thompson has a zero offset clamp. All you can do at best is maintain stock geometry with a Thompson.
The only difference is the Thomson layback doesn't allow you to lower your seat as far as the aforementioned 99%.
cryptid01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-05, 01:44 PM   #9
mx_599
Lost in the Black Hills
Thread Starter
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by gastro
The only difference is the Thomson layback doesn't allow you to lower your seat as far as the aforementioned 99%.
okay...so now i am more confused. i mean i get it, but are you guys saying that if i like the stock feel that i basically need a thomson layback model??

if this is the case, then why the heck does thomson make so many strait model sizes? anyone who buys a strait seatpost is going to be shifted forward? that doesn't make sense to me.

sorry to harp on a dead issue, but before i buy one in the future i'd like to know some of these details.

also, no one addressed the expensive vs cheap thomson.

thanks
brian
mx_599 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-05, 02:15 PM   #10
skyfish
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 34
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
It is a waste of money getting the Thomson Masterpiece (lighter), unless the other components on your bike are super light, and you are over-cautious about total bike-weight. A Thomson Elite is as strong, if not stronger.
skyfish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-05, 05:39 PM   #11
mx_599
Lost in the Black Hills
Thread Starter
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by skyfish
It is a waste of money getting the Thomson Masterpiece (lighter), unless the other components on your bike are super light, and you are over-cautious about total bike-weight. A Thomson Elite is as strong, if not stronger.
i'm a ******, i should've been able to come to that conclusion myself. i kind of figured that. thanks for the confirmation. probably why no one was answering my post
mx_599 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-05, 06:58 PM   #12
seely
The Rabbi
 
seely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Bikes:
Posts: 5,088
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mx_599
okay...so now i am more confused. i mean i get it, but are you guys saying that if i like the stock feel that i basically need a thomson layback model??

if this is the case, then why the heck does thomson make so many strait model sizes? anyone who buys a strait seatpost is going to be shifted forward? that doesn't make sense to me.

brian
Its all on the Thompson website, including the info I passed along to you about the setback being the same as a stock post w/ an offset clamp.
seely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-05, 08:28 PM   #13
mx_599
Lost in the Black Hills
Thread Starter
 
mx_599's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Bikes:
Posts: 5,725
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by seely
Its all on the Thompson website, including the info I passed along to you about the setback being the same as a stock post w/ an offset clamp.
okay...thanks!
mx_599 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:15 AM.