Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-28-02, 12:26 PM   #1
knobbymojo
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
knobbymojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Bikes:
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Whats your favorite suspension fork?

What is your favorite suspension fork and why? Im curious because I am looking at replacing my old one.
knobbymojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 01:07 PM   #2
Joe Gardner
BikeForums Founder
 
Joe Gardner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Utah.
Bikes:
Posts: 4,249
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Depends on the type of riding. What do you currently have, that will give us a clue on what advice to offer.
Joe Gardner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 01:19 PM   #3
knobbymojo
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
knobbymojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Bikes:
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Im looking for something with 100mm of travel. I currently have a rock shox sid 100. Weight is a concern, but wont make or break the deal. I do mostly xc racing/riding, but I want to stay away from the 60-80mm travel forks for concerns about how it will affect my steering geometry.
knobbymojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 03:46 PM   #4
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
Posts: 16,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I think rock shox is best for xc. But what do I know I am just a heavy freerider who loves marz.
Maelstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 04:05 PM   #5
dirtbikedude
Gravity Is Yer Friend
 
dirtbikedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: "Over the Hill" and going down fast in the 805.
Bikes: Scott Gambler, Scott Ransom, Kona Bear, Bianchi 928 Carbon/Chorus, C'Dale Rize4
Posts: 2,961
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
I am just a heavy freerider who loves marz
Dito that. If you are concerned with weight then SID is the way to go. If you want some thing a bit stronger with more travel then definitly go with a Marzocchi. There xc race forks work well and will hold up better then a SID but they will ad a bit of weight. You can check their forks out at:

http://www.marzocchi.com

Slainte
dirtbikedude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 05:33 PM   #6
PeterG1185
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MI
Bikes:
Posts: 691
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Dont forget fox. They make the beefiest xc forks out there with the 32mm stanchions. I'd personally take a fox with your given circumstances, but you could also check out the marathon S with 100 mm of travel
PeterG1185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-02, 09:38 PM   #7
CycleMON
Senior Member
 
CycleMON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I had a Rock Shox SID 100 on my old bike and now I use a Marzocchi Marathon 80 on my current bike. The Marzocchi fork is about the same weight if not lighter than the SID 100, and stiffer. The SID Race and SL weigh 2.8 and 3 lbs respectively, the SID 100 weighs 3.4 lbs.

The Marathon 80 weighs 3.2 lbs, and the Marathon 100 weighs 3.3 lbs. The Marzocchi forks are so much more structurally stiffer and feel better (re: plusher) than the SIDs.
CycleMON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-02, 01:52 AM   #8
redfox
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Ashford,Al
Bikes:
Posts: 175
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I love the manitou black.Mine is adjustable 80-100mm by a switch.Fast and easy.It's a great performer.They also have a 100-120mm i think.
redfox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-02, 01:51 PM   #9
knobbymojo
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
knobbymojo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Rochester, Minnesota
Bikes:
Posts: 136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I am also curious about the durability or lack thereof with each fork brand. I have heard rockshox are difficult to rebuild and that marzocchi is the best for durability. I think manitou has some good forks, but I havent heard much about durability/ease of mainenance. I know from personal experience that my sid 100 is a pain in the butt to work on, and now it is developing bushing play with about 100-120 hours on it. Can anyone weigh in on any of this? I am leaning towards the marzocchi marathon right now, but I dont know much about manitou so any comments on their forks would be great.
knobbymojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-02, 04:09 PM   #10
PeterG1185
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MI
Bikes:
Posts: 691
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I have a fox and the thing works flawlessly. Durability wise it'd be better than the manitou and from a friend of mine that has a marathon it is beter than the marathon. Rebuildability they're about the same
PeterG1185 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-02, 05:33 AM   #11
CycleMON
Senior Member
 
CycleMON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Bikes:
Posts: 141
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If it wasn't for the Marathon's light weight I would be using a Fox Fork.
CycleMON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-02, 10:30 AM   #12
Richard D
Donating member
 
Richard D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Faversham, Kent, UK
Bikes:
Posts: 1,852
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally posted by knobbymojo
I am also curious about the durability or lack thereof with each fork brand. I have heard rockshox are difficult to rebuild and that marzocchi is the best for durability. I think manitou has some good forks, but I havent heard much about durability/ease of mainenance. I know from personal experience that my sid 100 is a pain in the butt to work on, and now it is developing bushing play with about 100-120 hours on it. Can anyone weigh in on any of this? I am leaning towards the marzocchi marathon right now, but I dont know much about manitou so any comments on their forks would be great.
Manitou don't have a great reputation in the UK - the seals don't seem to cope with our weather. Marzocchi's have a good reputation over here, as do Fox and our local Pace forks.

Richard
__________________
Currently riding an MTB with a split personality - commuting, touring, riding for the sake of riding, on or off road :)
Richard D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-02, 03:17 PM   #13
fubar5
0^0
 
fubar5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Rolla, MO
Bikes: Redline Monocog,Surly Crosscheck, Lemond Reno
Posts: 4,056
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you've got the greenbacks, Fox is definetly the way to go. However, they do cost an arm and a leg. Next in line is Marz, yeah RS might be lighter or whatever, but the Marz Marathon S has a better lockout system, is more durable, and is better for bigger riders. After Fox and Marz I'd say Manitou Black. They are stiff, low maintenance, and smooth, some say under sprung but I don't think so. I haven't ridden these forks extensivley, but I've messed around with them on bikes at shops.
__________________
Booyah!!
fubar5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 PM.