Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 67
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've been looking at bikes alot recently and I had planned on doing this thread for a long time. Since Im bored at the moment, I figured Id make it now. Below, are all the bikes I want to test ride, and hopefully purchase one of. The brands - specialized, trek, kona, and santa cruz. Im looking for a cross country bike, whose geometry allows my back to not be hunched over so much. My friend has a 4900 and it feels like Im not hunched over on it at all when Ive rode it. So basically based on the pricing, just let me know which bikes your fond of and why. Also I may have the potential for a substancial amount of money soon.

    Retail values-
    Trek- 4900 (619.99)/ 6500 disc (909.99) / bruiser 2 (not sure, but I like this bike)

    kona- caldera (899.00)/ kikapu (999.00)/ kikapu delux (1299.00)

    Specialized- hardrock pro disc (700-750 not sure) rockhopper comp disc (880.00)/ rockhopper pro disc- all mountain (1100.00)/ rockhopper pro disc (1100.00)
    Ive found the all mountain and pro disc for 999.00 at a lbs

    Santa cruz superlight D ( I believe its 1599.00 not sure)

    Below are pics of all the bikes in order of me having posted them.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Each name links to where you can see the geom specs and component lists. Its ok if you don't want to look over every bike, just let me know which you prefer out of the bunch and why.

  3. #3
    Senior Member zx108's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    N.J.
    Posts
    1,545
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    the o6 kona looks like it got a component downgrade. and the shock was swithed to a coil, no good for xc. rockhopper is more of an all mountain/trail bike. a giant trance is a good bike, i was thinking of getting one and now looking back i think i should have. i was hesitant about the meastro though, but it has proved itself. the santa cruz looks like a nice bike.

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well at specialized it says for the rockhopper heading- xc trail hardtail fun and durable off road performer. I'd love to have something over 80mm in the front. 100 minimally, the all mountain has a 130mm bomber. Id like something a bit stronger than a classic xc bike, that can handle some rocky trail use if you get what I mean. The kikapu dlx has an air shock, and I think it has lockout. If I get a dualie xc bike I want lockout.

  5. #5
    Custom User never's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    T0L0K0
    Posts
    3,739
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    By design, XC bikes have you more bent over and stretched out. If you want to be less hunched over, then get something with a shorter top tube and more slack head/seat tube angles. That'll likely be a bike classified as All Mountain or Freeride.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know, but what Im saying Is Ive ridden an 04 4900 and a 6500 and neither of them feel like Im hunched over too much. I mean I don't mind being hunched over some, just with my current bike my seat is 2-3 inches over the handle bars and my back starts hurting.

    I plan on test riding all these bikes to see which feels like Im not too hunched over. I just want to know which bikes based on components and frame quality you guys like the best.

  7. #7
    Custom User never's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    T0L0K0
    Posts
    3,739
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoF3ar
    I know, but what Im saying Is Ive ridden an 04 4900 and a 6500 and neither of them feel like Im hunched over too much. I mean I don't mind being hunched over some, just with my current bike my seat is 2-3 inches over the handle bars and my back starts hurting.
    That's strange because between there is a big difference in top tube length between the 4900 and 6500. For equivalent sized bikes, you should have felt more stretched out on the 6500. But something must be really wrong with the setup/fit of your current bike. Do you have any pictures of you on it that shows your seated position?

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by never
    That's strange because between there is a big difference in top tube length between the 4900 and 6500. For equivalent sized bikes, you should have felt more stretched out on the 6500. But something must be really wrong with the setup/fit of your current bike. Do you have any pictures of you on it that shows your seated position?
    Haven't you seen pics of my current bike. The top tub is barely angles up at all. Thats why I have the bar riser on there which helps but still makes me really hunched over. I said the 4900 and 6500 are similar, I like the 4900 feeling better though.

  9. #9
    don't misunderestimate me BoSoxYacht's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    take your time, enjoy the scenery, it will be there when you get to it
    My Bikes
    07 IRO BFGB fixed-gear, 07 Pedal Force RS
    Posts
    5,621
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoF3ar
    I know, but what Im saying Is Ive ridden an 04 4900 and a 6500 and neither of them feel like Im hunched over too much. I mean I don't mind being hunched over some, just with my current bike my seat is 2-3 inches over the handle bars and my back starts hurting.

    I plan on test riding all these bikes to see which feels like Im not too hunched over. I just want to know which bikes based on components and frame quality you guys like the best.
    Do you stretch-out and warm-up at all before riding? I have 3 discs in my lower back that were herniated two and a half years ago, my seat is 4-5 inches higher than my grips ,and I ride with little to no pain from my back. I really wish you had a digital camera (so we could see your riding position) . Something just isn't right that you are in pain.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    South City, Ca
    Posts
    3,348
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by BoSoxYacht
    Do you stretch-out and warm-up at all before riding? I have 3 discs in my lower back that were herniated two and a half years ago, my seat is 4-5 inches higher than my grips ,and I ride with little to no pain from my back. I really wish you had a digital camera (so we could see your riding position) . Something just isn't right that you are in pain.
    Im going to class right now, but I have a camera Ill just get on the bike with jeans on so you can see when I get back in a few hours.

  11. #11
    Banned. sngltrackdufus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    tartarus
    My Bikes
    MTB's & a Cyclocross
    Posts
    1,258
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Stumpjumper..oooo...oooo....oooo!!!!

  12. #12
    Senior Member Tag1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by NoF3ar
    I know, but what Im saying Is Ive ridden an 04 4900 and a 6500 and neither of them feel like Im hunched over too much.
    If those felt good, they would be at the top of my list for that reason. In fact they seem a level below some of the other bikes from other manufacturers up there (price-wise)...you should also try a 6700, maybe even an 8000, and a Fuel 70 and 80. I just recently rode a 6700 briefly and it felt a lot nicer then the 6500 for some reason...

  13. #13
    cptn. x-chains sidekick gmoneyhobbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    san jose, ca
    My Bikes
    stumpie, xtr, sid, ultimate sd
    Posts
    455
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sngltrackdufus
    Stumpjumper..oooo...oooo....oooo!!!!

    what he said ^^^^^ stumpie

  14. #14
    Banned. sngltrackdufus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    tartarus
    My Bikes
    MTB's & a Cyclocross
    Posts
    1,258
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Scott Scale's are a good ride too. Particularly the Limited..

  15. #15
    Banned. sngltrackdufus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    tartarus
    My Bikes
    MTB's & a Cyclocross
    Posts
    1,258
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by gmoneyhobbit
    what he said ^^^^^ stumpie
    Are you calling me "stumpie"?....

  16. #16
    Banned. Jason222's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Moncton NB
    My Bikes
    Trek Jack...trials bike soon.
    Posts
    2,123
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Trek Bruiser 2's perform AMAZINGLY on trails. They are somewhat short, so they are easy to bunnyhop, and the big tires make riding over anything on the trails a breeze. Check out mine. (click 'My baby' in my sig)

  17. #17
    Hey guyz? Guyz? Wait up!! Siu Blue Wind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    10,547
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I would consider the Santa Cruz if you are going squishy.
    Quote Originally Posted by Buddha
    We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world.
    Quote Originally Posted by making View Post
    Please dont outsmart the censor. That is a very expensive censor and every time one of you guys outsmart it it makes someone at the home office feel bad. We dont wanna do that. So dont cleverly disguise bad words.

  18. #18
    Banned. Hank Rearden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by zx108
    and the shock was swithed to a coil, no good for xc.
    Why?

  19. #19
    Elite Rep
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Melbourne - Australia
    Posts
    2,097
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Hank Rearden
    Why?
    Weight would be one thing.

  20. #20
    Banned. Hank Rearden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by blue_neon
    Weight would be one thing.
    Being a bit heavier doesn't make a coil shock "no good" for xc riding, especially at the price points being discussed.

  21. #21
    To be continued Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller, 1977 Puch Pathfinder
    Posts
    19,073
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    There really isn't anything wrong with using a coil shock for xc purposes.
    Strike like an eagle and sacrifice the dove.
    Words and Stuff.

  22. #22
    DNPAIMFB pinkrobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cowtown, AB
    My Bikes
    Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
    Posts
    4,654
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Um, you should really look at the Stumpjumper. http://www.specialized.com/bc/SBCBkM...keTab=techspec
    Very similar geometry to the 4500, but with a sweet fork and overall a great component spec. Try the Trek 6700 if you can't afford the Stump.
    Proud Member of the HHCMF
    '06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning

  23. #23
    Senior Member ankush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    182
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    you probably should decide whether you want a hardtail or a squishy first before you go any further. then allocate a budget and accordingly start testing bikes. the way you have it now, with so many bikes up there, it is really hard to compare, mainly because you give no parameters inside of which one can compare. the bruiser for instance i would not consider if you want a pedalling trail bike with not much street use intended. also, it is not possible to compare a hardtail to a squishy. atleast i dont think so.

    having said all that, if i had a decent (realistic) amount of money right now, and if the bike fit right, i would probably buy a iron horse mkiii if i was buying a fully. and if i had to buy a hardtail all over again, i would go with a santacruz chameleon or something similarly versatile. my present hardtail is fine though, i like how i sit on it, though i dont like the tire clearance it has. have fun shopping man!
    Trek 6500

  24. #24
    cptn. x-chains sidekick gmoneyhobbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    san jose, ca
    My Bikes
    stumpie, xtr, sid, ultimate sd
    Posts
    455
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by sngltrackdufus
    Are you calling me "stumpie"?....

    yes, yes i am... not

  25. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Bathurst oz
    Posts
    1,428
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I wanted a Stumpy to go with my Roubaix but they're horribly overpriced for the spec over here so I went with a Giant xtc 2. Fantastic spec for the price. Now that I'm used to it, it's a great performer as well. My only complaint would be flex in the bb when hammering out of the saddle. But coming from road bikes, perhaps that's an issue common to all mtbs?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •