Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-01-06, 06:58 PM   #1
wgb1
Newbie
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
2004 or 2005 Trek

Hey guys,

I am looking at purchasing a used Trek bike. One is a 2004 Trek 4900 in very good condition and the other is a Trek 4900 in mint condition The difference is 300 USD versus 400 USD respectively. My question........is there any difference in components between the 04 and 05? I suspect they are the same bike just a year difference. Money is sorta tight so I am considering the 04 over the 05. Your thoughts are appreciated!!
wgb1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-06, 08:05 PM   #2
minastirith
Junior Member
 
minastirith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Waterloo/Toronto, ON, Canada
Bikes: Trek 4500
Posts: 16
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Since both bikes are the same model, I am guessing they have similiar spec's. I would suggest getting 2004 one since nothing much would have changed (may be a paintjob). It is possible that Shimano and Bontrager may have changed designs of their bike components but the change is minimal. With that extra $100, you could probably spend it on some other bike accessory.
minastirith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-06, 08:20 PM   #3
Tag1
Senior Member
 
Tag1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northern California
Bikes:
Posts: 292
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Actually, according to Trek's site, they didn't make a 4900 in '05 (?) Check the archive on the Trek site under '2003-2005' bikes.

Here's the specs on the '04:

'04 4900
Tag1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-06, 10:01 AM   #4
Portis
Banned.
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Home alone
Bikes: Trek 4300 X 2. Trek 1000, Trek 6000
Posts: 6,019
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If everything else is equal in terms of condition, save yourself $100 on the bike and spend it on accessories.
Portis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-06, 06:16 PM   #5
Chumley360
Senior Member
 
Chumley360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Norfolk, VA
Bikes: '06 Trek 4500, 2004 Trek 4500, 1998 Diamondback Topanga
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I can't speak for th 4900 series, but I have an '04 4500 and an '06 4500. Yes there are different components on the bikes like wheels, brakes, and crank. I personally haven't noticed enough of a difference in feel from one to the other to mention anything. And the parts move had to be fairly lateral since the overall cost of the bike didn't change much. I would think that this line of thought could be applied to other bike series as well. But I could be wrong.
Chumley360 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 PM.