Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    3
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rockhopper Comp Disc vs. Fuel 70

    I don't know much about bikes and after searching for a month, I decide between the 06' Rockhopper Comp Disc and the 06' Trek Fuel 70. They both cost less than $1k and the Rockhopper is an hardtail while the Fuel is an full suspension bike. The weight is about the same, but I can't decide please help!!!!

  2. #2
    '05 NUEser EJ123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,374
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Is the Fuel Disk? I know the earlier models were or werent then they switched or something.
    Id go with the Rockhopper though.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    680
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd go with the Rockhopper Comp Disc since you are starting out, a hardtail is a much better investment at the same price. FS also causes bad habits on people starting out, you'll become a better, more active, less lazy rider in the end if you start on a hardtail and if you'll do any kind of dirt jumps and small drops, a hardtail will teach you how to land correctly (HTs are less forgiving than FS on jumps and drops) which will be a valuable skill when you get into more serious stuff.

    Besides, the Rockhopper probably has better components (J2 against RS Tora, mechanical Shimano against the BB5/7 on the Comp disc) and overall i think it would be a better beginner bike than a FS like the Fuel 70.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Tag1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    292
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both nice bikes, the real question is: Do you want a hardtail or full-suspension?

    I wanted to spend about 1k and was facing a similiar situation. I went hardtail, because although I used to be pretty into riding, it was 7 years ago and I wanted to regain my savvy on a hardtail before I plow over everything with a FS. Besides, my old bike was full-rigid, so even the front-suspension on my hardtail is feeling plush!

  5. #5
    suburban rasta mon biggsmoothe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Atlanta GA
    Posts
    79
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i have an '05 rock hopper comp disc and i really like it. it feels like it has no trouble handling my 220lb body, although being a hardtail it is rough at times. and it is heavy. +30 lbs i think. i know trek makes good stuff too, so you'll have to ride both and see which one calls to you louder.

  6. #6
    later free_pizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,471
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When i was looking around for my new bike a few years ago, i had the choice between a Fuel 80, and my Cannondale F600. Both the same price, Cannondale was much lighter, better components. The Fuel really appealed to me because it was dual suspension. After careful thought, i choose the Cannondale.

    I'm so glad i chose the hardtail!

    Moral of the story i guess is dont be impressed with a bike because it's a full suspension.

  7. #7
    Bike Junkie roccobike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    South of Raleigh, North of New Hill, East of Harris Lake, NC
    My Bikes
    Giant OCR-C, Specialized Tarmac, Specialized Stumpjumper FSR, Stumpjumper Comp, 05 Rockhopper, 88 & 92Nishiki Ariel, 01 Bianchi Campione, 87 Centurion Ironman, 92 Paramount, 97 Lemond
    Posts
    8,984
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Tough call! I know several MTBers that just changed over to dual suspension and love it. But none of them purchased a base line dual suspension MTB like the Fuel 70. All I can recommend is, be sure to consider the weight of both bikes. BTW, I like my basic Rockhopper and recommend that frame, (but I just purchased a 05 FSR XC Comp). Good luck with your decision.
    Roccobike BF Official Thread Terminator

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I don't get why you are choosing between a Fuel 70 and a Rockhopper Comp Disc because they are different bikes...one is a FS and the other is not...Fuel 70 is the cheapest Trek FS XC bike there is
    The rockhooper comp disc is USD $880,,,,Rockhopper is the second lowest end in Hardtail of Specialized...cheapest is Hardrock

    The parts as in drivetrain, brakes is better on the Rockhopper as trek is about the same price but giving you a FS bike...the trek have Shimano brakes where the rockhoppper have Avid which is the best wire brake you will ever get...the trek uses SRAM VS rockhopper Shimano...

    I can't say which one is better as they are different bikes

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •