Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1
    droppin a deuce
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Regina
    My Bikes
    1996 Raleigh Tarantula - haha!!
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    component importance

    just wondering what your humble opinions are for my situation...

    I am looking to get into trail mountain biking and spend 1000-1300 cdn on a new unit. I realize all components are upgradable, but am wondering where to focus my $ on the initial investment. For example, I am wondering if have a better forks may be a bit more important than having better brakes.

    Also, at that price range, any suggestions on components and/or bikes?? I am currently considering Trek 6700, Cannondale F600, Rockhopper pro disc (if avail in Canada), Rocky Mountain Vertex 10...

    Thanks!
    Last edited by deuce_nuts; 04-10-06 at 03:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Mullet Boy! Pink_Ninja's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Adelaide
    My Bikes
    a giant upland 03, old europia road bike or something and soon to be getting a Norco Bigfoot or something of the sort
    Posts
    690
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    forks before brakes, but if the brakes are supa **** then get something that is more level.
    Bansheeeee!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Drunken Chicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Spain, although I'm Hungarian
    My Bikes
    Check signature
    Posts
    1,855
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'd say the two critical things that make the biggest difference (to me) are the brakes and the fork. If your brakes are OK but you're unhappy with your fork then definately change the fork when possible. If you have v-brakes then it's better to upgrade them to discs and THEN change the fork (if you feel the need to).
    One thing: am I right in saying that the F600 has either a Headshok or a Lefty fork? If so, I don't think you'll be able to change it (could someone please correct me if I'm wrong?) I'm not sure about this though.

    Ride all the bikes and buy whichever feels best to you. =)
    2005 Ironhorse 7.3
    2005 Specialized Hardrock Sport

  4. #4
    Lost in the Black Hills mx_599's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    5,725
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i think i would sacrifice brakes first. it seems like only the most expensive bikes come with the "top" of the line brakes. since i like top notch brakes, i wouldn't even factor it in to my purchase...i would just get nice ones soon after.

    but i guess everything i just said above could apply to forks as well. oh well, nevermind. i mostly just wanted to show off my new avatar

  5. #5
    droppin a deuce
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Regina
    My Bikes
    1996 Raleigh Tarantula - haha!!
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have been told that if I want to change the forks on the F600 that I would need an adapter to go with a 'standard fork' - though I am not sure how much that would cost.

  6. #6
    later free_pizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,477
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Deuce, glad to see you signed up.. these guys will give you lots of good advice...

    as for the adapters (headset reducer) - http://www.betd.co.uk/product_list.asp?CategoryID=169

  7. #7
    later free_pizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,477
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Drunken Chicken
    One thing: am I right in saying that the F600 has either a Headshok or a Lefty fork?
    it has the headshok
    Quote Originally Posted by Drunken Chicken
    If so, I don't think you'll be able to change it (could someone please correct me if I'm wrong?) I'm not sure about this though.
    you can change them, you just need the headset reducers i noted above.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    320
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    it all depends on what riding you do...for me, its:


    frame >>> fork >>> brakes >>> drivetrain/wheel >>> seatpost >>> >>> saddle >>> the rest (handlebar/stem/headset, etc)

    to support my way:

    1st - frame : handling i think its the most important thing you are looking into when u get a car if you really drive besides power which in the case of a bike, it depends on ur leg. So handling would comes first and it comes from the frame geometry

    2nd - fork: an air fork would improve handling but more bumpy feel, if you are doing drops, jumps, or anything big, a coil would be a good choice. if weight is a problem, get an air

    3rd - brake : you need them to stop. Period!

    4th - drivetain - shifting, weight (barly), thats its

    5th seatpost - on my first real MTB ride, i broke my seatpost clamp...thats what i put it 5th, GET A THOMSON ELITE and you won't go wrong. Its the lightest beside carbon Easton and easton don't have a good clamp

    6th saddle - its really a pain if you have a crappy saddle if you are going for a long ride

    7th - the rest : its just weight and look mostly

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    california
    My Bikes
    Specialized Hardrock Sport 2006
    Posts
    196
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am agreeing with Achc those are what i think are the most important! Nice post
    Specialized Hardrock Sport 2006
    Dk Four Pack 2004 (Dont have anymore traded for a Bmx racing bike Free Agent Speedway Junior!

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, OH
    My Bikes
    2004 Trek 4600, 1980's Univega Supra Sport, 2006 Lemond Reno
    Posts
    2,287
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Get a $50 Surly 1x1 fork. It is 2.9 pounds, then you can afford a *****in set of brakes.

  11. #11
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,889
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    1 - Fork / rear shock
    2 - Brakes
    3 - hubs/wheels
    4 - everything else (and yes that includes drive train)

    I don't really include frame as that isn't a component, its assumed that *THAT* would be the most important part of the bike.

  12. #12
    droppin a deuce
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Regina
    My Bikes
    1996 Raleigh Tarantula - haha!!
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Thanks! Any guidance for these forks...

    Cool, that kinda confirmed my 'gut feeling'!

    I am also noticing a trend that a lot of bike manufacturers tend to place a better rear versus front deraileur. Is this perhaps becuase people tend to shift the rear gears more often??

    Also, if anyone has an opinion, how would the following forks compare in weight, feel, adjustability etc:
    1 -- MZ Gran Fondo Race 3 Fork (2006 Vertex 10 Rocky Mountain)
    2 -- Headshock DLR (2006 F600 Cannondale) - Improved over 2005 model I beleive...has external rebound adjust now...
    3 -- Rockshox Tora 318 Air (2006 Trek 6700)

    I have been hearing great things about the Headshock, and the lockout is really attractive to me, but if someone has experience with the other forks, I could use some insight, thanks!

  13. #13
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,889
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Front deraileurs varry very little. I could not notice a different between lx and xtr. Once I hit lx I was in dream land compared to my old oem deore.

    Would love to help with the fork but I don't know diddly about xc so I will leave my recommendation on the shifting

  14. #14
    droppin a deuce
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Regina
    My Bikes
    1996 Raleigh Tarantula - haha!!
    Posts
    13
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    oh yeah - mostly trail riding

    I forgot to mention that I am mostly going to be doing some trail and city driving (about 40%-60% respectively...) Nothing too crazy on the trails, maybe some small 1-2 ft drops, with "some" hilly sections...

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    London UK
    My Bikes
    Specialized Stumpjumper 05
    Posts
    32
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know it's already been said but I'll chime in: Get the best frame you possibly can. Then Fork (forks are expensive) and then brakes (get some sweet Vbrakes like Avids for v. little money!). Sure, drivetrain is important but also very upgradeable bit by bit, so it's not crucial to get right straight away.

  16. #16
    later free_pizza's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    2,477
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by deuce_nuts
    I am also noticing a trend that a lot of bike manufacturers tend to place a better rear versus front deraileur.
    what mael said, and the fact that a bike with an XT rear/Deore front is far more appealing to some people than a bike with xt front/ deore rear.

    Quote Originally Posted by deuce_nuts
    maybe some small 1-2 ft drops
    when we get you out on the trails, a 2 foot drop is not as small as you think!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •