Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-15-06, 08:17 PM   #1
8Romans
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Which bike is better?

I've been doing some consumer research to decipher which mountain bike I should buy. I would like to start riding XC/Trail and entering some races from time to time just for fun, but I'm not sure which one of these bikes offers the best bang for the buck for my purposes. I don't really care if it's HT or FS (so please don't debate that here). I just want the best quality bike for the price so I can upgrade as I get more competitive without having to purchase a whole new ride. Which one of these bikes do you guys suggest I get:

Kona Cinder Cone
http://www.konaworld.com/shopping_ca...3&parentid=253

Norco Rival
http://www.norco.com/ts/pass/norco06...ival&col=black

Iron Horse Maverick Elite Performance Exclusive
http://www.performancebike.com/shop/....cfm?SKU=21236

Specialized Hardrock Comp Disc
http://bikemart.com/itemdetails.cfm?...gId=39&id=1874

Thank you very much for your help! I'll remember your names when I'm on the podium.

Last edited by 8Romans; 05-15-06 at 09:10 PM.
8Romans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:19 PM   #2
leonardotmnt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The best bet would be to ride all of your choices and see what fits best. After that you can see if you have any favorites. Parts can be replaced down the line but the geometry can only be changed so much.
leonardotmnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:22 PM   #3
FF 6800
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Long Beach, California
Bikes: 2005 Specialized hardrock pro... pike426, e.13 drs, fsa gap crank, formula k24's, and some more/2006 Scattante R-660 easton circuit wheels.
Posts: 594
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by leonardotmnt
The best bet would be to ride all of your choices and see what fits best. After that you can see if you have any favorites. Parts can be replaced down the line but the geometry can only be changed so much.
I totally agree
FF 6800 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:23 PM   #4
Jason222
Banned.
 
Jason222's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Moncton NB
Bikes: Trek Jack...trials bike soon.
Posts: 2,123
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
For durability, I'd probably say the Norco Rival.
Jason222 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:25 PM   #5
8Romans
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would love to ride them, but there is only one good bike shop in my area and the only bike out of these four that they carry is the Specialized. So, I'm kind of at the mercy of a half-blind internet purchase. Although, I completely agree with you, and I wish I could ride them first. That would be an excellent way to make my decision...Thanks ninja turtle & 6800.
8Romans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:25 PM   #6
Chone
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 680
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would remove the Iron Horse from my list like that!, its simply not worth it. The rest all have similar specs (almost the same) so I guess go with whatever fits you best. BTW, your link LINKS to a Kona Blast. If I was buying blind I´d probably go with the Kona or maybe the Hardrock because it has SRAM but even then I would reconsider as the Norco looks great too.

Flip a coin maybe? Its not like the difference will be huge, even geometry is similar on those bikes (the rival and HR look almost the same). Also take in mind price, warranty and stuff like that.
Chone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:27 PM   #7
a2psyklnut
NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS!
 
a2psyklnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
All good/decent entry level bikes. Ride them all, buy the one that fits the best. If you can't decide between two. Buy the one with the better fork.

All these bikes are pretty much the same, the components are all about equal. The frames are all about equal. The forks are all about equal.

The differences? Geometries and Paint color.

Fit should be your first criteria. Then the fork because it will be the first thing you'll want to upgrade. Then color.
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:28 PM   #8
leonardotmnt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 307
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If it's your first bike you should really try to ride before you buy and not get it off the internet but to each his own.
leonardotmnt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:33 PM   #9
8Romans
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks for the heads-up, Chone. I fixed it. I did mean the Cinder Cone, btw.
8Romans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 08:52 PM   #10
8Romans
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Also, thank you all for being so receptive and helpful.
I would much rather get suggestions from knowledgeable people than from someone just trying to make a sale, ya know?

And, I think I knew to strike the Iron Horse off the list. I think I just liked the way it looked.

So, the Iron Horse is out,
and I have one vote for the Norco thus far.

Anyone else care to share your opinion?
8Romans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-06, 09:42 PM   #11
Funkychicken
mmm... chicken!
 
Funkychicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Bikes: 04 Kona Blast
Posts: 668
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
without looking at the numbers, the norco's geometry seems more agressive than the kona or the spec, looks like highest bb of the 3. If you're looking to expand your style to some jumps, that geometry would suit best. personally i like the kona.
Funkychicken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-06, 03:58 AM   #12
8Romans
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Thanks Funky.

So, that's 2 votes for the Norco
and 1 vote for the Kona.

Anyone else care to assist?
8Romans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-06, 04:30 AM   #13
[bEn]
Just Ride
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Melbourne - Australia
Bikes: 2005 Giant Yukon with the works.
Posts: 1,343
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If all bikes fit well, then i would go with the Norco. I like Kona and Specialized, but the Norco looks like the better bike. Always test ride before you go out and buy!
[bEn] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-06, 05:00 PM   #14
WannaGetGood
Commited Suicide
 
WannaGetGood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Abbotsford.BC
Bikes: 2001 Kona Stuff & 2004 Rocky Mountain Switch SL
Posts: 2,416
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I would say the Cinder Cone. I know someone with a Rival, and he hates it now cuase its heavy and crappy parts.
WannaGetGood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-06, 08:27 PM   #15
lllllllll
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My vote is for the Cinder Cone. I ride an 05 Cone, and i think it's a great bike. I know that Kona downspec'ed the 06 models, so the components are a bit cheaper, but you do get the beefier tubing. Kona's are built to take anything, so it should last you a long time too.

Either the Cinder Cone or the Hardrock.
lllllllll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-06, 11:22 PM   #16
8Romans
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 11
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Right on! Thanks fellas...

That's 2 votes for the Norco,
3 votes for the Kona,
and 2 consollation votes for the Specialized.

I think at this point I'm going to have to go ride the Kona and Specialized, because these were the only ones that I could find at a LBS within 30 miles of me. I'll give special consideration to the Cinder Cone.

Thank you all again very much. Since I'm so new to this MTB thing, you'll probably see me on these forums asking a question from time to time.

Until then....
8Romans is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:11 PM.