Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-25-06, 01:30 AM   #1
mattymax
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Buying a GF HKEK, What Size ??

I went to ride them the other day. Im by no means a tall guy at all....Im about 5'7", maybe 5'8".

I drove the 17.5 frame and it just felt kinda small....Almost like my other bike did..Like I have TOO much control almost... I rode the 19 around and it defiently felt bigger and better just a bit less control than the 17.5.

Im coming off a junk GT mountain bike with a really small frame that Ive owned since about 1998 so bare with me guys....

I just kinda wanted to make the thread to see what people are riding?? If you are inbetween sizes, if you went up a size or down a size. Its a huge decision since is $1000.

Anyother question, how do you like the bike ?? Of course the question comes up of, do I go with rear suspension or not. Im kinda leaning towards NOT.

-matt

Is the HKEK a Good choise among the array of bikes out there ??
mattymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 08:47 AM   #2
pinkrobe
DNPAIMFB
 
pinkrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
Posts: 4,654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm 5'11", and I ride a 17.5", so I'm thinking 19" might be big on you. Then again, YMMV. Are you actually going to ride this bike off-road on actual singletrack? If so, I wouldn't go with the 19" unless you really feel you need a longer top tube. Oh, and more control is a GOOD thing. Trust me.
__________________
Proud Member of the HHCMF
'06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning
pinkrobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 08:58 AM   #3
Curtis_Elwood
Senior Member
 
Curtis_Elwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Bikes:
Posts: 585
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
at 5'11", I bought a 19" GF. It was ridable, but was too big. I'm now on a 17.5" frame.
Curtis_Elwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 01:06 PM   #4
mattymax
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I rode both and I really cant decide. The 19 feels just as good as the 17.5, but when I ride the 17.5, I feel like the bike is just "tiny"

-matt
mattymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 01:12 PM   #5
junkyard
Fourth Degree Legend
 
junkyard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: American Gardens Building
Bikes: 2005 Kona Cinder Cone & 2010 Cannondale SuperSix
Posts: 3,826
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
buy what feels most comfortable. you're the one riding it, so you should be happy with it.
junkyard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 01:17 PM   #6
dgsmith15
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkrobe
I'm 5'11", and I ride a 17.5", so I'm thinking 19" might be big on you.
Same thing here...I ride a 17.5 Wahoo and I'm 5'11". It should be just right for you
dgsmith15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 01:41 PM   #7
pinkrobe
DNPAIMFB
 
pinkrobe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cowtown, AB
Bikes: Titus El Guapo, Misfit diSSent, Cervelo Soloist Carbon, Wabi Lightning, et al.
Posts: 4,654
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
A big consideration is where you ride. If it's technical XC, then the 19" will become more than you can handle, and at the worst time - typically around a sharp turn with a some roots and a big pointy rock on the other side. If you don't have to turn quickly, bunnyhop, ride steeps or do anything overtly difficult, then go for the larger frame. Perhaps a cyclocross bike is more up your alley?
__________________
Proud Member of the HHCMF
'06 Cervelo Soloist Carbon | '09 Titus El Guapo | '09 Misfit diSSent | '09 Wabi Lightning
pinkrobe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 02:07 PM   #8
a2psyklnut
NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS!
 
a2psyklnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
First of all, overall rider height isn't the critical measurement for bike sizing. Inseam is. Measure your inseam and see how that compares with other riders.

For instance, I'm 6'0", but I've got short legs, so I generally feel comfy on a smaller frame with a longer stem. Someone who is 5'10" with longer legs might be more comfy on a larger frame with a short stem.

Ask the shop to let you try the 17" with a slightly longer stem.

In between sizes on a mountain bike, I would generally steer towards a smaller frame. Too many instances where a lower top tube can save the "boyz" if you know what I mean.

Also, a smaller frame is stronger due to the shorter tubes making up the frame.

Are you locked into buying a Gary Fisher? Have you tried other brands?
__________________
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 02:28 PM   #9
mattymax
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I like Gary Fisher. I always have looked at a Gary Fisher as a great bike, and definetly my next "real" bike....I really havent looked into any other different brands at all.

I guess when I go up there sat for the 19", Ill look at the 17.5" again and make a decision. Like I said, I rode both and cant really tell if one is more comfortable than the other. I just feel like the 17.5" frame feels tiny compared to the 19"

-matt
mattymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 03:13 PM   #10
DonValley
Mountain Bikes are Art
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 309
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I rode a 19 inch Hkek and liked it. I am 5 11'. I think it would be better to go smaller. I bought a 19 inch Kona and I can see that an 18 would be better for the tight stuff.
DonValley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-06, 03:28 PM   #11
mikeE46
Senior Member
 
mikeE46's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: OC, CA
Bikes:
Posts: 452
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Sh*t, I'm 5.11 and riding on 17"
And I knew it is small.
mikeE46 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-06, 08:38 AM   #12
badger1
Senior Member
 
badger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Bikes:
Posts: 2,586
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 43 Post(s)
FWIW, if you (the OP) really are in the 5'7/5'8 height range, I would say that a 19 HKEK (Fisher size LARGE) would definitely be too big; can't imagine anyone my height (5'9) or shorter, no matter one's leg/torso relative proportions, fitting properly on the 19. The 17.5 is a Medium -- you're right smack in the height range, if anything you could probably size down, rather than up, but probably the 17.5 is exactly right. I wonder: are you reacting to the fact that Fisher's current h/t frame design "looks" very small/compact, because of the radically-dropped top tube (great for standover clearance)? I say this because if you go by effective toptube/reach, the bike (Medium) is plenty "big" even with the stock 90mm stem.
badger1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-06, 03:50 PM   #13
mattymax
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I bought a 17.5" HKEK. It should be in tue or wed.

-matt
mattymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-06, 04:31 PM   #14
wez312
Senior Member
 
wez312's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Nevada
Bikes: 2015 Soma Wolverine
Posts: 162
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
My new Rockhopper is a 19" and I'm about 5'10"-5'11"
wez312 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-06, 09:41 PM   #15
mattymax
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 5
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Some Pictures









mattymax is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 AM.