Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    121
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Any experience with Maxxis Crossmarks?

    My FSRxc came with specialized Resolution 26x2.0 tires which are advertised at 803g each. I was looking at the Maxxis Crossmarks and the eXCeption series are advertised at 530g each. I could cut my bike weight down by over a pound if I just changed tires.

    My question is has anyone had any experience with the crossmarks? I do mostly easy to moderate singletrack around here with a few old rail trails thrown in.
    '04 Fuji Marseille
    '06 Specialized FSR XC Comp


    "Experience is what you get right after you really need it..."

  2. #2
    sarcasm meter: jerk mode santiago's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Montréal, QC, Canada
    My Bikes
    2005 Kona Blast; 2005 Turner Flux, 2006 Felt F3C
    Posts
    4,510
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It sounds like your current tires may have a wire bead. The Crossmarks you looked at likely have a kevlar bead and there are some decent improvements switching from a wire bead tire to a kevlar bead tire:
    - lighter
    - easier to mount/dismount
    - folds up nicely

    That being said, I have no specific experience with the Crossmark tires but if you're looking to save weight then look for any kevlar-bead tire that suits your style of riding. I like the Specialized Roll-X Pro. I also like the Schwalbe Nobby Nic.
    First Class Jerk

  3. #3
    Bikeless Member cream.soda's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    markham
    My Bikes
    none :(
    Posts
    299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i ride adrenaline 26x2.00's (actual measured size 2.13 inches), but I have the pro dual compound version, and it tips the scales at around 618g. keep in mind advertised numbers can vary by 0.1 to even 2 ounces from the actual tire you're getting. personally i'd love to shave a full pound from my bike just by switching tires... but my tires are pretty light already and I don't want to move away from these adrenalines which have great traction and the middle knobs are great when i'm biking on the road.

    i've heard a lot of good things about maxxis crossmarks, seen a bunch of ads in MBA too. i've seen it on pro cross country racing rigs too, although they only might be there because the rider is sponsored by Maxxis.

    personally i'd go with the time-proven roll-x pro d2's, which got 4th place in MBA's sept. 2005 trailbike tire comparo.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    121
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Which tires came in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in MBA's sept. 2005 trailbike tire comp?
    '04 Fuji Marseille
    '06 Specialized FSR XC Comp


    "Experience is what you get right after you really need it..."

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    10
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ride the Maxxis Crossmarks and I find them to be very good tires...they are certainly fast, but when it is wet (w/roots and rocks) they tend to slip and slid. They are however suprisingly good in the mud. I think they would be great tires for the dry hardback out west but I would only rate them as adequate for rocky, rooty New England. I am experimenting with the air pressure to see it that helps....

    -BF

  6. #6
    Bikeless Member cream.soda's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    markham
    My Bikes
    none :(
    Posts
    299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DrugCoder
    Which tires came in 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in MBA's sept. 2005 trailbike tire comp?
    variations of the Kenda Nevegal, apparently... first was Kenda Nevegal Stick-E, tubed, converted with Stan's NoTubes sealant. second was the Nevegal Stick-E without the sealant, and third was Nevegal DTC or something like that.

    basically, nevegals. but roll-x costs substantially less than the top three, and I'm partial to specialized anyway, and the roll-x has a harder compound in the center of the tire (i do a lot of street riding too) so i'd go with the roll-x pro d2 for a longer-lasting, cheap, and still really good trail tire.

  7. #7
    ÖöÖöÖöÖöÖö Dannihilator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Annandale, NJ.
    My Bikes
    2014 Surly Steamroller, 1977 Puch Pathfinder
    Posts
    18,793
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    MTBAction = the suck.
    Strike like an eagle and sacrifice the dove.
    Words and Stuff.

  8. #8
    '05 NUEser EJ123's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    3,374
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Im on the Crossmarks EXception. I am really pleased with them. I can lean in turns really well, and it glides over water unlike most other tires. They work best for me on hardpack dirt and the occasional pavement especially. Go buy them!

  9. #9
    Bikeless Member cream.soda's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    markham
    My Bikes
    none :(
    Posts
    299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KonaRider24
    MTBAction = the suck.
    meh, every magazine has their weaknesses, you can't please the entire crowd. I like MBA, but I don't restrict myself to just that magazine.

  10. #10
    is slower than you Peek the Geek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    WI
    My Bikes
    Gunnar Sport, Marin Pine Mountain, Gunnar Ruffian, Gunnar Roadie, BMC Fourstroke, Salsa Vaya
    Posts
    1,486
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KonaRider24
    MTBAction = the suck.
    Unless you like XC. Then, MTBAction = the only

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •