Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Monster Cross

  1. #1
    Senior Member smurfy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    1,159
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Monster Cross

    While reading the MTBR forums I was intrigued by the thread on Monster Cross bikes. Apparently this seems to be a new sub-category of cyclocross bikes but are mainly used for mtn biking than 'cross racing (too heavy). I guess the main attributes of these bikes are room for 700x42 (and larger) tires and frame geometry is closer to a 'cross bike rather than a 29'' mtn bike, or maybe something in between the two. Also drop h/bars or a variation of such as an On-One Midge or Mungo, or maybe a moustache bar.

    I imagine the most obvious example of a "monster cross" would be the Surly Karate Monkey and I guess the Rivendell Atlantis would qualify, too . A friend of mine who works at the LBS has a KM and it looks awesome. I don't own one but I did test-ride one (1x9, dics brakes) and it is sweet.

    Any other frames out there that would be a monster cross? I was wondering if mainstream bike manufacturers will jump on the bandwagon and make a complete bike like this?
    "You handle it like you handle a bicycle" - Jacques Rosay, Airbus A380 test pilot

  2. #2
    Banned. John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    75
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by smurfy
    Apparently this seems to be a new sub-category of cyclocross bikes but are mainly used for mtn biking than 'cross racing (too heavy). I guess the main attributes of these bikes are room for 700x42 (and larger) tires and frame geometry is closer to a 'cross bike rather than a 29'' mtn bike, or maybe something in between the two. Also drop h/bars or a variation of such as an On-One Midge or Mungo, or maybe a moustache bar.
    That sounds more like a marketing effort to create another "new" sub-category of bike rather than a real change.

    I've run my Hakkalugi with 45c tires and used it for mountain biking for a relatively long time...

  3. #3
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,232
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    This is a thread that needs to be bumped back up.
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  4. #4
    M_S
    M_S is offline
    All Mod Cons M_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Face down in a snowbank
    My Bikes
    K2 Enemey Cyclocross franken build; Redline D660 29er, Volpe SS Cross
    Posts
    3,694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A cross style bike with larger than cross race tires is good for mixed pavement and dirt rides, and dirt roads, but pales in comparison to an actual mountain bike once the trails get technical. Not that you can't do it, it just isn't optimal equipment.

    That said, here's my cross bike with 700x42 ritchey speedmaxes. I have since replaced the gossamer cranks with a raceface cadence, changed the chainring from 38t to 42, added a BBG bash guard, and replaced the long cage ultegra derailleur with a short cage.

    When more trail and less road is involved I run a panaracer fire cross 700 x 45 on the front.


  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    624
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i've run my cross bike with 38s and plenty of room to spare did some xc, worked just fine super fast, but my hands get tired, the hoods arn't the best hand position for taking bumps and braking is way harder (cantis vs hyro disc lol) not that i can't stop just my hands were hurting by the end of it, I also run a 1x9 with a bash

    I think basically any non-high end frame would be fine, the fancy frames with the 130 rear hub instead of the 135 have tighter clearances

  6. #6
    M_S
    M_S is offline
    All Mod Cons M_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Face down in a snowbank
    My Bikes
    K2 Enemey Cyclocross franken build; Redline D660 29er, Volpe SS Cross
    Posts
    3,694
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    ?

    Almost all cross bikes use 130 (road) spacing, especially if not designed for disc use. This includes my decidedly not high end K2 pictured above. The width of the hub doesn't really have anything to do with the tire clearance. On most bikes the limiting factor is the chainstays. With a perfectly true wheel I could fit a marginally bigger tire than pictured, but not by a lot. The seatstays and fork have gobs of clearance, though. But evry bike is different.

    The surly crosscheck is kind of the standard in monster cross use, since it's super sturdy, can take road or mountain hubs, is singlespeed and geared compatible, and hass clearance for 45mm fire cross tires front and rear. There are some other good options too, though, and disc brakes can be nice for "monster cross." You can even start with a rigid 29er frame if it has acceptable geo.

  7. #7
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,232
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by M_S View Post
    ?

    Almost all cross bikes use 130 (road) spacing, especially if not designed for disc use. This includes my decidedly not high end K2 pictured above. The width of the hub doesn't really have anything to do with the tire clearance. On most bikes the limiting factor is the chainstays. With a perfectly true wheel I could fit a marginally bigger tire than pictured, but not by a lot. The seatstays and fork have gobs of clearance, though. But evry bike is different.

    The surly crosscheck is kind of the standard in monster cross use, since it's super sturdy, can take road or mountain hubs, is singlespeed and geared compatible, and hass clearance for 45mm fire cross tires front and rear. There are some other good options too, though, and disc brakes can be nice for "monster cross." You can even start with a rigid 29er frame if it has acceptable geo.
    I thought the true Monster bikes, if there really is one, were cyclocross bikes not MTBs. Isn't a 700C MTB called a 29'r? So, is there a difference between a Monster Cross bike and drop bar 29'r?
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  8. #8
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I find it comical that a bike labeled "Monster Bike" when put side by side with D's Blindside would resemble a cowering road bike. I think they should retract the "Monster bike" label and just call it a crosser with the differences listed.

  9. #9
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,232
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    I find it comical that a bike labeled "Monster Bike" when put side by side with D's Blindside would resemble a cowering road bike. I think they should retract the "Monster bike" label and just call it a crosser with the differences listed.
    A pic of D's Blindside sure would help.
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  10. #10
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

  11. #11
    cs1
    cs1 is offline
    Senior Member cs1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Clev Oh
    My Bikes
    Specialized, Schwinn
    Posts
    6,232
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    WOW, you're right. That is one BAD ASS looking bike.
    1999 Waterford RSE-11, 1995 Waterford 1200, 1989 Specialized Rockhopper Comp
    1989 Raleigh Technium, 1989 Schwinn Traveler, 1986 Specialized Rockhopper
    1984 Specialized Stumpjumper, 1986 Specialized Stumpjumper and just way too many projects to list.

  12. #12
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    Hecklah
    Posts
    10,932
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
    BAD ASS
    Fit's the rider

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •