Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Senior Member elysdean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Yreka, CA
    My Bikes
    Desalvo custom MTB; 96 Klein Quantum II road bike
    Posts
    128
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    1.95 or smaller XC tires.

    Hey everyone!

    I'm already looking for new XC tires for next race season. I'm riding a steel hard tail and am looking for a set for mostly hardpack conditions with some loose soft dirt on top. We are generally dry, so mud isn't an issue (besides I have a good set of mud tires). Nor are roots or big rocks. I'm looking for something with really low rolling resistance. I've been running 2.1 lately and am looking for a change.

    I've looked at Maxxis, WTB and Ritchey tires, but I wanted to see if there are any other brand/models I should be considering. Thank you for your help.

    Scott

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto & Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Ellsworth Id
    Posts
    964
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm a fan of Kenda Karma Plus Stick-E's and Kenda Karisma's...both great XC racing tires. You can get Karisma Lites as well, 495g

  3. #3
    Soma Lover
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Logan, UT
    My Bikes
    one bike for every day of the week
    Posts
    765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I love the WTB Epicwolf 1.95's on my Zaskar, sick fast at 465g, enough knob to corner but not as well as some of my other tires. I think they were discontinued and reintroduced as a slightly heaver and tougher Exiwolf. My Ritchey Excavader/Elevader combo is also pretty fast and corners a bit better but their braking performance in anything less than hardpack conditions has disappointed me.

  4. #4
    unofficial roadie DirtPedalerB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Out in the woods you see
    My Bikes
    2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike
    Posts
    1,444
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I ran some Irc mythos 1.95's for a while, decent grip.. very fast and light.. and CHEAP the 1.95 size on these seems narrower than a normal 1.95 at least to me. I'm a fan of the Ritchey tires, try the zed race, I use those in a 2.1 side and like them .. also cheap sometimes.

  5. #5
    artistic tricyclist
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Fredericton, Canada
    My Bikes
    2k3 Norco CRD3, 2k2 Kona Stinky, 2k1 Devinci Cactus, 1984 Norco Eliminator Mk.II, 1973 CCM Mistral, 1980s Peugot Sport SL TT, 2k1 Giant XTC NRS1, 2k Norco VPS Drop, 1992 Specialized Rockhopper
    Posts
    316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    IRC seracs are good, I run Kenda Karmas currently and couldnt be happier. Shwalbe Racing Ralphs are light and narrow, super fast, but kinda pricy.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Regina, SK, CA
    My Bikes
    2002 Rocky HT
    Posts
    945
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Schwalbe Racing Ralphs or Nokian NBX Lites. If you want fast rolling go for the larger sizes of either.

  7. #7
    unofficial roadie DirtPedalerB's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Out in the woods you see
    My Bikes
    2004 Marin bobcat trail, 2006 trek fuel ex7, 2007 iron horse road bike
    Posts
    1,444
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by KrisA
    If you want fast rolling go for the larger sizes of either.
    How does this make sense? narrow = fast rolling right?

  8. #8
    Soma Lover
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Logan, UT
    My Bikes
    one bike for every day of the week
    Posts
    765
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by DirtPedalerB
    How does this make sense? narrow = fast rolling right?
    Given than the weight is the same, the larger tire will have a shorter contact patch and roll faster. Unfortunately, 10% larger and the same weight also means 10% thinner and 10% more puncture prone. There is a different optimal size for every terrain, frame geometry, and riding style.

    Handling is another issue. Correct me if I wrong, but I've been taught that a narrower tire lowers the bottom bracket and makes for more precise handling. Even without the extra cush, bigger tires allow the bike to hold a line through rough stuff better although tight line changes are compromised.

    I also have some Tioga Factory XC Slick 1.85's that I'll put on the Zaskar every one in a while. They're an ounce or two heavier but they roll even faster than the Epicwolfs. The way that bike takes tight switchbacks on those tires makes me drool. Too bad their climbing bite and braking bite suck. They're just not great tires for most of the trails around here.
    Last edited by cachehiker; 10-19-06 at 08:28 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •