Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Rhyno Lite XL's

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Rhyno Lite XL's

    To my understanding the Sun Rhyno Lite XL's are a bit wider than the plain lite's. Does this width make a big difference? Wouldnt more tire surface touch the ground creating a higher rolling resistance?

    Oh yha, I am a 210 lb aggresive XC maybe freeride. If anybody has any other great recommendations for me let me have em'. Do you think I am too big for some mav x317's.

  2. #2
    NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS! a2psyklnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
    My Bikes
    Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
    Posts
    7,965
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I'm a bigun too, and I've had a pair of x317's, however, they were my race wheels ONLY, I'd suggest for anyone over 200 to stay away from them for anything where you might even think of catching some air. The rhinolites are good, and yeah, a wider rim = fatter tire (CAPACITY), you can run some thin tires on those rims without any issues. Like a 1.95 would be fine.

    I'm running a D321 rim on my bike (FREERIDE), but I do a lot of long trails between the technical areas of my local trails. I find a 2.1 tire a good balance between long straight stretches and some technical rocky drops.

    The benefit of a wider rim is the ability to run a wider tire, even up to a 2.75 or even some 3.0 if your frame can accomodate a tire that wide.

    As a fellow clydesdale, there are some mantra's I go by:

    Want a light bike? Forget about that extra piece of pizza first!
    If it's light, it WILL break!
    Go Big or Stay home!
    Chicks dig scars!
    Lightweight = expensive = two jobs = no time to ride!
    "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
    "Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    9
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks for the info, so the objective of the XL's is to run some fatty tires. If I throw a 2.1 on them would I tell a difference in a Ryhno Lite XL or plain Rhyno Lite.

    Finally, why do all these bikes/forks/etc have to be designed for 170lb guys? Its not like I'm fat, just big boned. I think Bicycle manufactures should finally admit that they do agree with the slogan - "There's a weight limit for this ride"

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Alexandria, VA
    My Bikes
    IRO Model 19, Surly Crosscheck, 1989 Arnie Nashbar
    Posts
    1,087
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I agree with a2psyklnut, forget about weight-go with the strongest stuff possible. I'm about 255 pounds of twisted steel and sex appeal (that's what I tell the ladies at least) and love the Rhyno lites/xt's with 2.1" moto raptors. I bent everything else and went through a couple lx level hubs too. I was also bending the square taper b.b.'s that I had until I upgraded to Race Face's splined b.b., btw-the Marzocchis are the only way to go in forks (check www.pricepoint.com). I do mostly semi-aggressive xc with drops to 2-3 feet.

  5. #5
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,888
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by amsteve
    Thanks for the info, so the objective of the XL's is to run some fatty tires. If I throw a 2.1 on them would I tell a difference in a Ryhno Lite XL or plain Rhyno Lite.

    Finally, why do all these bikes/forks/etc have to be designed for 170lb guys? Its not like I'm fat, just big boned. I think Bicycle manufactures should finally admit that they do agree with the slogan - "There's a weight limit for this ride"
    They aren't you just have to search. Most products that say something like 'shore approved', 'shore designed', 'whistler ready' etc...they tend to be for bigger guys. A good example is the banshee scream. The beast of full suspensions design and made for the shore by guys who live on the shore. This is a perfect bike for bigger guys. But its not cheap and is pretty heavy. ...

  6. #6
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,071
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Another Clydesdale "weighing" in some support for the Rhynolites. Good strong rims.

  7. #7
    Zippy Engineer Waldo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    IN
    My Bikes
    Bianchi 928, Bianchi Pista Concept 2004, Surly Steamroller, 1998 Schwinn Factory Team Homegrown, 1999 Schwinn Homegrown Factory, 2000 Schwinn Panther, Niner EMD9
    Posts
    1,801
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rhyno Lites are great for bigger guys or medium size guys that like to bounce off stuff at speed. Had great luck with some off the bruisers at our shop on those rims. Get a wheelset with the Ringle hubs and you'll thank me later.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •