what kind of mtb?
#1
go wake forest!!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
what kind of mtb?
i was a hard core mountain biker in the late 80s to early nineties...had been riding in the dirt since the early 70s
last bike was bought in 89 so i am way out of date...did some riding the past two summers at some ski resorts and rediscovered how much fun it is
i will not be as agressive a rider as i was 10-15 years ago ...i am getting too old for that
my main use will be x-country/single track....little downhill...will ride on roads sometimes to get to the off road
i want a light bike....front suspension a must and am considering full suspension....like disc brakes but not a must.
componants must be decent. i have read you can shift multi-gears with the xtr and that appeals to me but the price does not...any other groups offer that?
i rode some early full suspension bikes and did not like them but heard todays ones are much better. my main desire for a full suspension is comfort..... i dont want to sacrafice too much pedaling efficiency but will give up a little to preserve my back
for my type of riding...is it better to go for a light bike with front suspension only (ie litespeed) or get an efficient full suspension design (ie santacruz)
thanks
last bike was bought in 89 so i am way out of date...did some riding the past two summers at some ski resorts and rediscovered how much fun it is
i will not be as agressive a rider as i was 10-15 years ago ...i am getting too old for that
my main use will be x-country/single track....little downhill...will ride on roads sometimes to get to the off road
i want a light bike....front suspension a must and am considering full suspension....like disc brakes but not a must.
componants must be decent. i have read you can shift multi-gears with the xtr and that appeals to me but the price does not...any other groups offer that?
i rode some early full suspension bikes and did not like them but heard todays ones are much better. my main desire for a full suspension is comfort..... i dont want to sacrafice too much pedaling efficiency but will give up a little to preserve my back
for my type of riding...is it better to go for a light bike with front suspension only (ie litespeed) or get an efficient full suspension design (ie santacruz)
thanks
#2
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally posted by bandaidman
componants must be decent. i have read you can shift multi-gears with the xtr and that appeals to me but the price does not...any other groups offer that?
componants must be decent. i have read you can shift multi-gears with the xtr and that appeals to me but the price does not...any other groups offer that?
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#3
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
BTW, if you really want to grab handfuls of gears at a time in either direction for both front and rear, you may want to consider SRAM GripShifters. Some models of GripShifts will even work with Shimano drivetrains.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#4
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The XT line is the best bang for the buck... XTR not worth the premium in cost-to-performance ratio... what is your budget... Mountain Bike Action magazine did a recent test/review on SC Blur, Titus RacerX, and some other mid-range priced XC bikes... Supergo.com has a great deal on a K2 Team Razorback at a killer price for the bike and components (have to call or email for this particular bike)... the Tomac '98 Special at JensonUSA is also a pretty good deal... I think disc brakes are worth the upgrade... Price Point has the Avid Mechanicals at a great price... now you have to fill us in on what you decide... best of luck!
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: US:AZ
Posts: 362
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally posted by bandaidman
for my type of riding...is it better to go for a light bike with front suspension only (ie litespeed) or get an efficient full suspension design (ie santacruz)
for my type of riding...is it better to go for a light bike with front suspension only (ie litespeed) or get an efficient full suspension design (ie santacruz)
#6
go wake forest!!!!
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 312
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thanks for the replies
the local shops carry all the big names and also have in stock litespeed, santa cruz etc.
one of the local shops has a nice full suspension bike for rent (refundable if you buy any bike in the store) but it is a bit small for me
i could spend up to $2-3000 but am also open to a less expensive bike if it suits my needs
i guess my main question is ..... will i see much benefit from a full suspension if i mainly trail ride....(ie dont do a lot of hardcore downhill or technical riding) ...or is it better to stick with a hardtail?
the local shops carry all the big names and also have in stock litespeed, santa cruz etc.
one of the local shops has a nice full suspension bike for rent (refundable if you buy any bike in the store) but it is a bit small for me
i could spend up to $2-3000 but am also open to a less expensive bike if it suits my needs
i guess my main question is ..... will i see much benefit from a full suspension if i mainly trail ride....(ie dont do a lot of hardcore downhill or technical riding) ...or is it better to stick with a hardtail?