Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  

Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-10-03, 01:22 PM   #1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Corvallis, OR
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
gary fisher tassajara vs marlin vs trek 4900

Hey first post here....

I was just wondering your opinions on these options. Im leaning towards the gary fisher side of things. Im not sure if its worth spending the extra 140 bucks to get the tassajara or if I should just get the marlin and do upgrades later on down the road. Let me know what you think

thanks in advance
soc522 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-03, 01:36 PM   #2
a2psyklnut's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
Bikes: Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
Posts: 7,964
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Do you know that Trek owns Gary Fisher?

Even though they are both owned by the same Company (TREK USA), their frame geometries are different. However, they have similar components at each different price point. i.e., same fork and shifters..etc. on each $700 bike.

Gary Fisher has what is called the "Genisis Geometry" it has a longer top tube and shorter rear end. The Trek is more traditional. You have to test ride each bike and determine which you like more. Personally, I like the Trek's geometries better, but I don't mind the GF. Plus, I think GF paint scheme's are better looking.

Regarding the Tassajara, I do think it's well worth the $140 over the Marlin. It's what I consider a good Entry Level Race Bike, meaning you could take this thing out to race w/o changing a thing! The Marlin is more Recreational.

"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
"Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger
a2psyklnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-10-03, 03:28 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Bikes: GT Forte Ti, GT GTR Carbon Sport, TCR C2, Ridley XBow, Specialized Tricross Sport, Specialized Langster, Xootr Swift
Posts: 2,295
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
if it was me, definately the tassajara IMO it's not even in the same "class" as the trek 4900 (haven't heard of the marlin). longer top tube makes for a better climber, but sacrifices stability going down hill. but i like a longer top tube because i like to keep my torso stretched/relaxed not cramped into a smallish cockpit.

btw welcome to the forums =].
tFUnK is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:36 PM.