Softtail vs full suss
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 86
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Softtail vs full suss
Couldn't find what I was looking for in a search, so here goes:
Was just looking to buy a full suss XC bike when I started seeing good reviews of softtail bikes. This got me thinking (in a bit of a dilemma really). I'm looking for an all-day bike tht will take the hits out of trails. Not looking to huck of large objects or anything, just regular XC stuff, moderately technical. Will be a high budget bike.
Question really is: anyone ridden both and can offer an honest comparison? Did riding a softtail offer all the advantages wthout the drawbacks, or did you really miss having 4" rear travel?
Not looking for specific recommendations, can find that elsewhere (other threads, reviews etc) just a type comparison.
I already have 2 hardtails (alu & steel) and they don't really cut it for long periods in the saddle - let alone multi-day stuff.
Was just looking to buy a full suss XC bike when I started seeing good reviews of softtail bikes. This got me thinking (in a bit of a dilemma really). I'm looking for an all-day bike tht will take the hits out of trails. Not looking to huck of large objects or anything, just regular XC stuff, moderately technical. Will be a high budget bike.
Question really is: anyone ridden both and can offer an honest comparison? Did riding a softtail offer all the advantages wthout the drawbacks, or did you really miss having 4" rear travel?
Not looking for specific recommendations, can find that elsewhere (other threads, reviews etc) just a type comparison.
I already have 2 hardtails (alu & steel) and they don't really cut it for long periods in the saddle - let alone multi-day stuff.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: MI
Posts: 691
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A soft-tail will never be a full suspension bike in the way that it takes hits. If you really want a softer feeling ride the FS is the only way to go and with the newer suspension designs, if you're looking for a bike that wont beat you up much, the drawbacks are all minimal. Take your steel hardtail and take a little more off of that and thats what a soft tail will feel like
#3
I'm bikey
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Posts: 52
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I've ridden both a soft tail and a fs with 4" in the back.
I would rather have the fs, it seemed to take the hits better.
The softtail just felt cheap in my opinion.
I would rather have the fs, it seemed to take the hits better.
The softtail just felt cheap in my opinion.
#4
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Hmmm... I may be the only person who likes soft-tails. I admit they're not meant to take the place of a full-suspension and I do own a full-suspenion but for what they're designed for, they're usually good bikes. If you really like the feel of a hardtail but just need a little bit more of the edge taken off in the rear then go for soft-tails. Bear in mind that this opinion comes from someone who also likes riding full-rigids. The problem with a soft-tail of course is that while it works very well within its design scope, its design scope is a bit narrow.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#6
DEADBEEF
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234
Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
4 Posts
Originally posted by troie
Ive never heard of a softtail. Whats that, rear suspension only?
Ive never heard of a softtail. Whats that, rear suspension only?
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
#7
Short bus rider
Join Date: May 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 424
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have both a hard tail and soft tail Specialized in the garage. I ride what I think of as XC, but because I am in SFLA which is very flat, there are plenty of stunts to make it challenging (and to remove my flesh). Without question the FSR is superior. Certainly it depends on your fork and shock, but if you get good components, go squishy.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Posts: 1,791
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I saw a sweet Trek soft tail the other day... I wanted it. I think it'd be perfect take the edge of the trail but still remain very efficient. If you ride that kind of XC stuff with no big drops/jump/hits it would be sweet.