Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 20 of 20
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Kenda Nevegal or Panaracer Fire XC Pro ???

    I live in Missouri and ride alot of XC singletrack. I just purchased a Bianchi Mutt 7700 and the tires have no control and corner terrible. I have already had the bike slide out from under me on high speed turns.
    The tires that are currently on the bike are Contiental Speed King 2.3's.
    Im leaning more towards Panaracer Fire XC Pro 2.1's. Anyone have a recommendation???????
    The tires on my previous bike were Hutchinson Spider Air light and they were great tires. Im looking to try something different though. Anyone have a recommendation???????

  2. #2
    Too Much Crazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Ventana El Comandante, Lynskey ridgeline, EWR OWB, GF HKEK, Gunnar Roadie, Spesh E5 S Works, Quintana Roo Kilo, Intense BMX Cruiser
    Posts
    3,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Nevegal

  3. #3
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by picasso View Post
    I live in Missouri and ride alot of XC singletrack. I just purchased a Bianchi Mutt 7700 and the tires have no control and corner terrible. I have already had the bike slide out from under me on high speed turns.
    The tires that are currently on the bike are Contiental Speed King 2.3's.
    Im leaning more towards Panaracer Fire XC Pro 2.1's. Anyone have a recommendation???????
    The tires on my previous bike were Hutchinson Spider Air light and they were great tires. Im looking to try something different though. Anyone have a recommendation???????
    I live in Kansas and ride alot of singletrack too...like oh ma'gosh!!!

    I wanted to get this in before Born2bahick tells you to go out and get some Panaracers

    I have used both Fire XC Pro 2.1's and Nevegal 2.35 Stick-E and DTC's. My favorite by far is the Nevegal. My favorite Nevegal for traction is the Stick-E compound, but they don't last long, so I use the DTC's. They still grip like a mutha, but last 4x longer. With the 2.35" casing, I can run around 37psi, get good traction, and still not pinch flat.

    I climb some steep, loose, rocky, rooty hills and don't run tubeless. I still get hella traction! A couple of riding buddies use the Fire XC Pro 2.1's, but they run them with Stan's. They get hella traction too, but I'm too leary of tubeless.

    Both are good tires and it really depends on who you talk to as to what kind of review you will get, but I've used Panaracer Fire's, WTB Velociraptors, Bontrager Jones, Kenda Smallblock 8, Kenda Knarly, Hutch Pythons, IRC Mythos XC, IRC Mythos XC slick, Tioga Factory Mud, Tioga Factory DH, Kenda Nevegal's...and some others that I can't remember anymore because of my age

    The Kenda's have given me the most traction and DTC's have lasted longest.
    Last edited by ed; 09-24-07 at 12:53 PM.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Also Im concerned about weight. I want a tire thats around 500g's. Thats why I was leaning towards the Fire XC Pro 2.1 cause it weights in at 580gs.

  5. #5
    Too Much Crazy
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    NY
    My Bikes
    Ventana El Comandante, Lynskey ridgeline, EWR OWB, GF HKEK, Gunnar Roadie, Spesh E5 S Works, Quintana Roo Kilo, Intense BMX Cruiser
    Posts
    3,299
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If you are worried about weight, I would go with a kenda karma instead the Panaracers.

    That is just my personal preference though.

    you can go for the nevegal in 1.95's also. similiar weight to the panaracers.

  6. #6
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    If there's anything that I've learned about tires...you expend more energy spinning up a loose climb trying to keep momentum with limited traction than adding 100g of rotating weight. Another reason I run 2.35's now.

    Just get some Kenda Smallblock 8's. They feel alot like the Hutchison Pythons in acceleration yet they have a ton more traction. Those things are waaaaay light and actually have quite a bit of traction until the trail gets wet. I had a pair and loved them for their intended purpose. They did pretty well on most dry trail conditions.

    They're like a mini'Nevegal. Same knobs as a Neve, but more/smaller/spaced closer.

    Really fast roller.

  7. #7
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by picasso View Post
    Also Im concerned about weight. I want a tire thats around 500g's. Thats why I was leaning towards the Fire XC Pro 2.1 cause it weights in at 580gs.
    I guarentee you won't notice the difference between a 610g 2.1 Nevegal DTC and a 580g Panaracer Fire XC Pro in weight as much as you will notice the advantage in grip of the Kenda over the Panaracer.

  8. #8
    pedal head
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,010
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    The Fire has very good grip but rolls a little slow compared to some others due to the massive knobbyness IMO.

    I just picked up Maxxis Crossmark and they are superfast. We have not had much rain recently... I'll see how that goes.

    By the way, Bikeforums.net is full of FireXC haters!

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    It looks like im gonna go with Nevegals. Would you guys recommend going smaller in the back and larger in the front. I was thinking about going 2.1 in the back and 2.35 in the front.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would a 1.95 in the back be to small?? It is a DTC lite and weighs 580gs?

  11. #11
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by probable556 View Post
    The Fire has very good grip but rolls a little slow compared to some others due to the massive knobbyness IMO.

    I just picked up Maxxis Crossmark and they are superfast. We have not had much rain recently... I'll see how that goes.

    By the way, Bikeforums.net is full of FireXC haters!
    Don't get me wrong (if indeed that was directed in my general dir.) the Fire is a good tire. I have a set on my wife's bike and my commuter / beater. I just find the Nev's to be much better "for me".

    Quote Originally Posted by picasso
    Would a 1.95 in the back be to small?? It is a DTC lite and weighs 580gs?
    Since the MUTT has a Tora, I'd say 2.1" on both ends would be pretty good for it unless you ride it like a cra-Z mofo or pick horrendous lines. If it were a completely rigid bike, then I'd say 2.35's all the way around. When I rode my XC/trail hardtail, I was using 2.1's on both ends, but since I moved over to a longer legged dually, I have bumped up to a bigger 2.35" casing.

    I guess there's nothing wrong with running 2.35's on an XC hardtail. They'd give you more cushion and grip better...

    Your weight concern makes me wanna say that you'd be happier with the 2.1's though.


    One of my riding buds is a crappy line-picker and pinches DH sections all the time. I put my old Stick-E 2.35's on his Fisher Tarpon and he is 100% happier with the extra cushion/traction/flat protection. He really isn't concerned with weight though...his HT is 36lbs.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Thanks alot for your insight. Im gonna go with 2.1 Nevegals.

  13. #13
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When you get them installed and hate them...don't get pissed off at me!

    (kidding...you will like them)


    Holy Crap!! I just googled the Speed King 2.3". No wonder you're washing out. Those look like WalMart tires, haha.

  14. #14
    pedal head
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,010
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
    Don't get me wrong (if indeed that was directed in my general dir.) the Fire is a good tire. I have a set on my wife's bike and my commuter / beater. I just find the Nev's to be much better "for me".
    Not your direction... The Nev's seem to always win the BF opinion polls. If I didn't already have a basement full of bike tires I might add them to the collection too.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Well I have two rides with the Nevegal 2.1's on the Bianchi mutt and I must say.. They stick like glue!! I LOVE THEM!! Thanks for the help .

  16. #16
    ed
    ed is offline
    . ed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    The Summit of Lee
    My Bikes
    2010 Jamis Parker, 2005 Jamis Komodo, 1998 Jamis Komodo, 198? Raleigh Pointe, 1978 Schwinn Super Le Tour 12.2
    Posts
    10,930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Good to hear that.

    I'm still loving mine.

    Did you get the Stick-E's or DTC's?

  17. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    41
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    DTC so they would last longer. Heard that the Stick-E's wear FAST!

  18. #18
    Senior Member hanshananigan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    My Bikes
    2006 K2 Apache 6.0, 2001 K2 Razorback Team
    Posts
    239
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I got my bike with Nevgal 1.95s on front and back. They didn't corner as well as I would have liked. I put Fire XC Pro 2.1 (Japanese factory) on the back, and the combo has been great. However, the Nevegal is in need of replacent. it's the first time I wore out a front faster than a rear tire!
    Hi!

    Location: Richmond, VA
    Style: XC, Mid-Atlantic roots, rocks, and poison ivy
    Rides: 2006 K2 Apache 6.0, 2001 K2 Razorback Team

  19. #19
    Senior Member MudPie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    1,874
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    A good Nevegal clone is Panaracer's Rampage (http://www.panaracer.com/mtb.php). I have 2.35 Rampage up front and 2.1 Fire XC Pro (Japanese with 127 tpi) in back. Great combo.

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    55
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My Michelin Mountain X'Tremes are performing great. Anyone have any experience with these tires? I like them as much as my old WTB Velociraptors.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •