Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-07, 07:50 AM   #1
jeff^d
enginerd
Thread Starter
 
jeff^d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Camas, WA
Bikes: Black Cat SS, Salsa Spearfish, Trek 520
Posts: 263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
basic FS questions

I just upgraded my 1998 Cannondale hardtail with a 2006 Kona Kikapu Deluxe. Talk about a world of difference. But, I have some very basic questions regarding the suspension:

1) Why is it called a 4-inch travel bike? Looking at my rear shock (Fox Float) and at rear shocks online, the dimensions are (example) 7.875" x 2". Wouldn't this mean the rear shock only travels 2"? I initially thought that it might be 4" total travel (front and rear), but I get about 3" out of the front fork (Marzocchi MZ3).

2) I plan to upgrade front and rear suspension eventually. Could I go with a slightly longer travel shock in the rear, such as 7.875" x 2.25"? I get some bob on the Float, so in a year or two I'll upgrade to something more efficient.

3) Front fork. What ranges of front fork travel should I look at, not wanting to change the geometry too much? What has worked for others? The MZ3 is advertised as 100mm, which I certainly don't get, and I'd eventually want something with air.

This thing is just so much fun to ride that I've already been out riding every day since I got it! Thanks in advance for the advice.
jeff^d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 07:54 AM   #2
BFG
Just say no to brakes.
 
BFG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Perth...Western Australia
Bikes: All the TGMBG mums
Posts: 1,693
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The travel on the shock refers to how much the rear wheel moves trough the shocks stroke.
BFG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 08:34 AM   #3
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff^d View Post
1) Why is it called a 4-inch travel bike? Looking at my rear shock (Fox Float) and at rear shocks online, the dimensions are (example) 7.875" x 2". Wouldn't this mean the rear shock only travels 2"? I initially thought that it might be 4" total travel (front and rear), but I get about 3" out of the front fork (Marzocchi MZ3).
The rear suspension linkage is probably in the neighborhood of 2:1 or a bit more. So for every inch that your shock moves, the rear tire will move 2. So you rear shock has a 2" stroke thus your rear end will compress around 2x that or: 4" travel frame. The fork doesn't make the bike. The frame is the foundation of the bike, so even though the fork has 3" travel...it's a 4" bike. You could get technical and call it a 4x3...or you could just buy a new fork with 4" of travel and balance it out and call it a 4" bike. Either way it doesn't matter as long as you like the way it feels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff^d View Post
2) I plan to upgrade front and rear suspension eventually. Could I go with a slightly longer travel shock in the rear, such as 7.875" x 2.25"? I get some bob on the Float, so in a year or two I'll upgrade to something more efficient.
No. You frame may be put under stress that it wasn't designed for. Tubes may bottom out on each other etc...
A Fox RP23 would be a good upgrade, but you could save some money and buy a Manitou Swinger 3 way for $99 right now from Santacruz Bikes online store. It has a pretty efficient pedaling platform that would suit your frame. Just remember to get the 7.875x2. You can order the bushings from Manitou or Universalcycles.com

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff^d View Post
3) Front fork. What ranges of front fork travel should I look at, not wanting to change the geometry too much? What has worked for others? The MZ3 is advertised as 100mm, which I certainly don't get, and I'd eventually want something with air.
If the MZ3 is adv. as 100mm then it's 4", not 3" as you stated earlier. The last inch may be much harder to achieve if you're just standing over it/compressing it b/c it could be like a bottom-out MCU or something for the "G-out" big hits. I don't know much about the MZ3. A good fork for a blue collar price would be a Rockshox Recon if you don't want to break the bank. The Revelation would be good as well, but more expensive. Both could be purchased with adjustable travel.

My fork of choice would be the Fox 32 Talas RLC. It's light and has adjustable travel as well. The Adj. travel function is nice b/c you can put it at 3" for tame/tight/twisty singletrack and have a snappier handling and more efficient bike. You can bump it up to 5" which will slacken your head angle making it steer slower for the high speed trails with bigger hits. Don't get crazy though. It's not an All Mountain bike.
The RLC version is nice b/c you will have a low speed compression adjustment which is similar to pedaling platform on the Manitou swinger or Fox RP23. Efficiency!

Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff^d View Post
This thing is just so much fun to ride that I've already been out riding every day since I got it! Thanks in advance for the advice.
For now, just ride it and enjoy it.
ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 10:09 AM   #4
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
The MZ3 comes in 100 mm or 120mm. What do you weight?



Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff^d View Post
I just upgraded my 1998 Cannondale hardtail with a 2006 Kona Kikapu Deluxe. Talk about a world of difference. But, I have some very basic questions regarding the suspension:

1) Why is it called a 4-inch travel bike? Looking at my rear shock (Fox Float) and at rear shocks online, the dimensions are (example) 7.875" x 2". Wouldn't this mean the rear shock only travels 2"? I initially thought that it might be 4" total travel (front and rear), but I get about 3" out of the front fork (Marzocchi MZ3).

2) I plan to upgrade front and rear suspension eventually. Could I go with a slightly longer travel shock in the rear, such as 7.875" x 2.25"? I get some bob on the Float, so in a year or two I'll upgrade to something more efficient.

3) Front fork. What ranges of front fork travel should I look at, not wanting to change the geometry too much? What has worked for others? The MZ3 is advertised as 100mm, which I certainly don't get, and I'd eventually want something with air.

This thing is just so much fun to ride that I've already been out riding every day since I got it! Thanks in advance for the advice.
Rutnick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 10:25 AM   #5
jeff^d
enginerd
Thread Starter
 
jeff^d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Camas, WA
Bikes: Black Cat SS, Salsa Spearfish, Trek 520
Posts: 263
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'm 150 lbs.
jeff^d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 10:33 AM   #6
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
honestly, you might not weigh enough to compress that fork all the way. I believe that's a coil fork and it might have higher rated coils for a bigger rider.

No worries unless you are really wanting all the travel.

I ran into that problem in both directions. On most bikes, they are rated for lighter riders and I'll bottom them out. On some (like Marzocchi, they might be rated for a bigger rider).

You take a big enough hit and it will give you more travel. At 190 lbs, I've got a marzocchi fork that I can't get all 80mm out of it when it was coil and after converting one side to air, I STILL can't get all the travel. It's setup right but that coil is dang strong. Didn't have the problem with their air forks.




Quote:
Originally Posted by jeff^d View Post
I'm 150 lbs.
Rutnick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 11:25 AM   #7
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutnick View Post
honestly, you might not weigh enough to compress that fork all the way. I believe that's a coil fork and it might have higher rated coils for a bigger rider.

No worries unless you are really wanting all the travel.

I ran into that problem in both directions. On most bikes, they are rated for lighter riders and I'll bottom them out. On some (like Marzocchi, they might be rated for a bigger rider).

You take a big enough hit and it will give you more travel. At 190 lbs, I've got a marzocchi fork that I can't get all 80mm out of it when it was coil and after converting one side to air, I STILL can't get all the travel. It's setup right but that coil is dang strong. Didn't have the problem with their air forks.
I disagree about the "no worries" part. (no I'm not a stalker)

An over sprung fork will give you crappy small bump compliance. You will lose traction on stutter bumps and small trail chatter. Your fork should be properly sprung no matter your weight. They make lighter springs.
ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 11:33 AM   #8
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I'll agree with you on that part. I guess it just depends on how that fork actually rides. Honestly, for the price of new coils vs a new fork....

It's not like that one is high end or anything.

I don't think you're a stalker. Your post wasn't abrasive.


Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
I disagree about the "no worries" part. (no I'm not a stalker)

An over sprung fork will give you crappy small bump compliance. You will lose traction on stutter bumps and small trail chatter. Your fork should be properly sprung no matter your weight. They make lighter springs.
Rutnick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 12:16 PM   #9
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,937
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutnick View Post
I don't think you're a stalker. Your post wasn't abrasive.
We stalker's appear that way at first
ed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-07, 12:42 PM   #10
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
was that you in my garbage this morning?


Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
We stalker's appear that way at first
Rutnick is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:51 AM.