Cycling and bicycle discussion forums. 
   Click here to join our community Log in to access your Control Panel  


Go Back   > >

Mountain Biking Mountain biking is one of the fastest growing sports in the world. Check out this forum to discuss the latest tips, tricks, gear and equipment in the world of mountain biking.

User Tag List

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-07, 12:11 PM   #1
pm63
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Shimano vs. SRAM

Hey,

Is there any difference in quality between Shimano and SRAM component series at similar price levels?

For example, are SRAM X.0 and Shimano XTR as good as each other? Are X.9 and XT comparable... etc?

Most bikes I'm looking at (hardtail up to $1200) seem to come with Shimano although some come with the higher end SRAM series.

Also: I notice most bikes come with trigger shifters, very little with gripshifts. Are there advantages or disadvantages or is it all personal preference?

Last edited by pm63; 10-01-07 at 12:41 PM.
pm63 is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 12:17 PM   #2
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by pm63 View Post
Hey,

Is there any difference in quality between Shimano and SRAM component series at similar price levels?

For example, are SRAM X.0 and Shimano XTR as good as each other? Are X.9 and XT comparable... etc?

Most bikes I'm looking at (hardtail up to $1200) seem to come with Shimano although some come with the higher end SRAM series.
X.0 is better than XTR
XTR is better than X.0
X.9 is better than XT
XT is better than X.9
X.7 is better than LX
LX is better than X.7

That's what you're going to be faced with here on the forums. It seems that a vast majority is shifting (no pun) toward SRAM. I have used X.9, X.7, and test ridden X.0. I have also used XTR, XT, LX, Deore, STXrc, STX, Alivio, Acera, and Tourney.

My favorite still seems to be XT. My SRAM stuff didn't last very long in comparison. Shifting "felt" different, but wasn't any more precise with my X.9 than XT.

BTW, you're gonna get flamed b/c you should use the "search function" before asking such a redundant question.
ed is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 12:18 PM   #3
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
Posts: 16,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Personally, I like either (but no freaking RR) but XT and X.7 are my level. Any higher, to expensive for my tastes, any lower and its garbage.
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 12:42 PM   #4
pm63
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 111
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Hmm... I guess my 200 bike with SRAM 3.0 and SX4 components isn't that great But hey, I have used it on terrain it wasnt built for.
pm63 is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 01:13 PM   #5
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
I ride SRAM x.7 and x.9 stuff on my FS bike and Shimano XT on my HT.

BOTH use shimano XT cassettes.

Honestly, I like them both.

SRAM really got popular when Shimano went with Dual Control with Rapid Rise. For those that liked pods, it was either buy older shift pods that were 9 speed or go SRAM. Dual Control...man...that is either love or hate....more than SRAM vs Shimano.

Shimano countered with coming back with pods, still offering DC and then offering thumb or trigger style shifting similar to Sram. Not the same but similar. The new Shadow derailer now has direct cable routing like Sram.

One day I will ride my sram bike and go...man I like this shifting. A few days later I will riding my XT bike and go...man, I like this shifting. It's a toss up for me.

Honestly, for me...the SRAM stuff seems to hold the adjustments more.

I've been riding shimano for eons and Sram for about 2 years now on my MTB.

I'm sure if Pete reads this he will say something snappy.


Quote:
Originally Posted by pm63 View Post
Hey,

Is there any difference in quality between Shimano and SRAM component series at similar price levels?

For example, are SRAM X.0 and Shimano XTR as good as each other? Are X.9 and XT comparable... etc?

Most bikes I'm looking at (hardtail up to $1200) seem to come with Shimano although some come with the higher end SRAM series.

Also: I notice most bikes come with trigger shifters, very little with gripshifts. Are there advantages or disadvantages or is it all personal preference?

Last edited by Rutnick; 10-01-07 at 01:23 PM.
Rutnick is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 01:15 PM   #6
born2bahick
Official Website Waterboy
 
born2bahick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Bikes: a lot
Posts: 3,271
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Please, not another one of these threads! This bandwidth should be saved for teenage drama and "what bike" polls!
born2bahick is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 01:30 PM   #7
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutnick View Post
I'm sure if Pete reads this he will say something snappy.
Maybe you should be banned, Rut. Grow up and let it go, man.
ed is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 02:10 PM   #8
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
thanks for caring.

What issue did you have with the longevity of the SRAM stuff though?

The 2008 rear X.0 derailer has been beefed up and the rear derailer cage is 22% stronger (not that I can afford it).


Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
Maybe you should be banned, Rut. Grow up and let it go, man.
Rutnick is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 02:45 PM   #9
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutnick View Post
thanks for caring.

What issue did you have with the longevity of the SRAM stuff though?

The 2008 rear X.0 derailer has been beefed up and the rear derailer cage is 22% stronger (not that I can afford it).
I care 'bout bikes, hehe.

My X.9 rear der. lasted a short time before the main pivot bushing became wobbly. The whole derailleur started leaning inward like the hanger was bent. (I'm thinking less than 6 mos)

I had the parallelogram linkage loosen up on my LX rear der.

I'd say the X.9 was on par with LX for durability and XT for shifting precision.

My XT is well over a year old and still retains the orig. tight tolerances.

I was thinkin' again about trying to save for a little bit'o Rohloff action, but I read some articles and reviews last night that are making me second-guess Rohloff's durability. It would be cheaper in the long run if it lasts as long as many have said. (approx 100,000km)

Some dealers have sold them for 10 years and had none of them malfunction...the scant few stories I read last night described a small number of cases that reflected otherwise. If it wasn't such a big "buy-in", I'd have taken the plunge long ago.
ed is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 02:59 PM   #10
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
almost $1300 for the disc version and you still have to buy a 4 bolt disc.

Is it the mileage or punishment that did in the derailer? I've got about 1k miles on the sram rear derailer and about the same on the XT. What year was the X.9?


Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
I care 'bout bikes, hehe.

My X.9 rear der. lasted a short time before the main pivot bushing became wobbly. The whole derailleur started leaning inward like the hanger was bent. (I'm thinking less than 6 mos)

I had the parallelogram linkage loosen up on my LX rear der.

I'd say the X.9 was on par with LX for durability and XT for shifting precision.

My XT is well over a year old and still retains the orig. tight tolerances.

I was thinkin' again about trying to save for a little bit'o Rohloff action, but I read some articles and reviews last night that are making me second-guess Rohloff's durability. It would be cheaper in the long run if it lasts as long as many have said. (approx 100,000km)

Some dealers have sold them for 10 years and had none of them malfunction...the scant few stories I read last night described a small number of cases that reflected otherwise. If it wasn't such a big "buy-in", I'd have taken the plunge long ago.
Rutnick is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 03:01 PM   #11
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
almost $1300 for the disc version and you still have to buy a 4 bolt disc.

Is it the mileage or punishment that did in the derailer? I've got about 1k miles on the sram rear derailer and about the same on the XT. What year was the X.9?

As you've said...the worst you have there is spiders.


Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
I care 'bout bikes, hehe.

My X.9 rear der. lasted a short time before the main pivot bushing became wobbly. The whole derailleur started leaning inward like the hanger was bent. (I'm thinking less than 6 mos)

I had the parallelogram linkage loosen up on my LX rear der.

I'd say the X.9 was on par with LX for durability and XT for shifting precision.

My XT is well over a year old and still retains the orig. tight tolerances.

I was thinkin' again about trying to save for a little bit'o Rohloff action, but I read some articles and reviews last night that are making me second-guess Rohloff's durability. It would be cheaper in the long run if it lasts as long as many have said. (approx 100,000km)

Some dealers have sold them for 10 years and had none of them malfunction...the scant few stories I read last night described a small number of cases that reflected otherwise. If it wasn't such a big "buy-in", I'd have taken the plunge long ago.
Rutnick is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 04:58 PM   #12
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutnick View Post
almost $1300 for the disc version and you still have to buy a 4 bolt disc.

Is it the mileage or punishment that did in the derailer? I've got about 1k miles on the sram rear derailer and about the same on the XT. What year was the X.9?

As you've said...the worst you have there is spiders.
1k miles isn't really all that much is it? (I got rid of my cyclocomputer long ago)

We have punishing trails...especially to nooblets who don't know how to ride rocky terrain. They would just be a bit of a snore to a rider who is accustomed to what I would consider "dream trails". I never laid the bike over or bashed the der. on anything though. It was a 2006 X.9. It could be the jumping. The jarring from the landing...heck I dunno. Really doesn't matter b/c I have ridden both der's the same way and the XT has already lasted 3x longer than X.9.
ed is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 05:01 PM   #13
dminor 
Moar cowbell
 
dminor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The 509
Bikes: are awesome.
Posts: 12,427
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
I was thinkin' again about trying to save for a little bit'o Rohloff action, but. . . If it wasn't such a big "buy-in", I'd have taken the plunge long ago.
Get that Sturmey-Archer, Ed, beat the crap out of it and then let us know how it went
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark Twain
"Don't argue with stupid people; they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience."
dminor is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 05:06 PM   #14
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by dminor View Post
Get that Sturmey-Archer, Ed, beat the crap out of it and then let us know how it went
I really should, but what the heck am I gonna do with an 8 speed hub on an XLT? I'll either kill my knees or have an MI.
ed is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 06:44 PM   #15
Dannihilator
User Title
 
Dannihilator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Annandale, New Jersey
Bikes: 2014 Surly Steamroller, 1989 Nishiki Altron
Posts: 19,422
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
I tried the Sram for awhile couldn't get into how they performed and the triggers gave me fits. With saying that, I'm perfectly pleased with my mix of XT and XTR parts.
__________________
Signature.
Dannihilator is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 07:06 PM   #16
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Which trails? Just want a frame of reference. Got any links?

I log all my mileage so I'm a slave to the computer. Road biking is the worst...log everything. Cadence, HR, avg HR, max, elevation, grade...blah blah

I use the 305 when I MTB because I like to see the trail later (especially new trails)


Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
1k miles isn't really all that much is it? (I got rid of my cyclocomputer long ago)

We have punishing trails...especially to nooblets who don't know how to ride rocky terrain. They would just be a bit of a snore to a rider who is accustomed to what I would consider "dream trails". I never laid the bike over or bashed the der. on anything though. It was a 2006 X.9. It could be the jumping. The jarring from the landing...heck I dunno. Really doesn't matter b/c I have ridden both der's the same way and the XT has already lasted 3x longer than X.9.
Rutnick is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 07:39 PM   #17
Trekbikedude
Bicycle Rider & Mechanic
 
Trekbikedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Delaware
Bikes: Superlight, Dragon Team, Eclipse, Om Flyer
Posts: 686
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
there's a video of sram vs shimano on youtube, and sram rear derauillers do perform better watch this and it'll do you in.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=AZQf1bduGYs

I still roll with XT though, it's what came on my bike. Some day, I'll have X0
Trekbikedude is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 08:23 PM   #18
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rutnick View Post
Which trails? Just want a frame of reference. Got any links?

I log all my mileage so I'm a slave to the computer. Road biking is the worst...log everything. Cadence, HR, avg HR, max, elevation, grade...blah blah

I use the 305 when I MTB because I like to see the trail later (especially new trails)
Lordy, I'm gonna vomit. I think your previous statement of "maybe it'd be fun to ride with Chelboed" should be re-thought. I don't log mileage, feet climbed, cadence, HR, average anything, blah...blah...puke. My goals aren't related to mileage or lap times.

I don't go all Bender, but I'm definately not a Ned. I just like to ride some trail and when I see a bump...I use it to somehow catch enough air to tweak out the bars a bit. (as long as I'm not worn out)

I'm not harping on you, it's just more like you're a roadie with knobbies and I'm a MotoX'er with pedals.

I think we need to break up.
ed is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 08:29 PM   #19
ed 
.
 
ed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Summit of Lee
Bikes: Hecklah
Posts: 10,932
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trekbikedude View Post
there's a video of sram vs shimano on youtube, and sram rear derauillers do perform better watch this and it'll do you in.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=AZQf1bduGYs

I still roll with XT though, it's what came on my bike. Some day, I'll have X0
After watching that video, maybe now I know why my X.9 may not have been as durable as the XT. It appears that the moveable arcing motion of the Shimano takes more of the stress off the main pivot bushing. Sure does suck when it smacks my chainstay, though.


I'm blowing all this straight outta my can, but it's a theory.
ed is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 09:16 PM   #20
Maelstrom 
Wood Licker
 
Maelstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Whistler,BC
Bikes: Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
Posts: 16,885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
I'm blowing all this straight outta my can, but it's a theory.
At least you're regular...
Maelstrom is offline  
Old 10-01-07, 10:50 PM   #21
ZeCanon
Writin' stuff
 
ZeCanon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Boulder, CO
Bikes:
Posts: 3,782
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
If you'll stick around you'll find that I'm and advocate of Sram.
why?
1) I really do like their stuff. It's light and strong, and I've never had any issues with it. I've broken far fewer X.0 derailleurs (only 1 in 2 years) than XTR derailleurs (went through 3 in one season a in 2005)
2) I don't have to buy any of it.
ZeCanon is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 12:08 AM   #22
Rutnick
Senior Member
 
Rutnick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Bikes:
Posts: 2,892
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
been riding in the dirt a LONG time. Only been back on the road for a couple of seasons.

Only started logging stuff last year.


Quote:
Originally Posted by chelboed View Post
Lordy, I'm gonna vomit. I think your previous statement of "maybe it'd be fun to ride with Chelboed" should be re-thought. I don't log mileage, feet climbed, cadence, HR, average anything, blah...blah...puke. My goals aren't related to mileage or lap times.

I don't go all Bender, but I'm definately not a Ned. I just like to ride some trail and when I see a bump...I use it to somehow catch enough air to tweak out the bars a bit. (as long as I'm not worn out)

I'm not harping on you, it's just more like you're a roadie with knobbies and I'm a MotoX'er with pedals.

I think we need to break up.
Rutnick is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 01:47 AM   #23
qqb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Both are the same ....... both have advantage and disadvantage ... IMO
qqb is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 03:28 AM   #24
cs1
Senior Member
 
cs1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Clev Oh
Bikes: Specialized, Schwinn
Posts: 6,669
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 15 Post(s)
SRAM vs Shimano or Campy vs Shimano. Things never really change much on the boards do they?

Tim
cs1 is offline  
Old 10-02-07, 08:31 PM   #25
BenLi
Hardrocker
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Bikes:
Posts: 1,569
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by cs1 View Post
SRAM vs Shimano or Campy vs Shimano. Things never really change much on the boards do they?

Tim
Fox vs. Rockshox
BenLi is offline  
Closed Thread


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:44 AM.