Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    XMart- Embrace the Wobble
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Frame Size - Why are sizes important?

    I haven't been able to find any good information on the site regarding why I seem to be only finding seemingly smaller frame sizes on good bikes as opposed to walmart bikes.

    That's not to say that the information isn't out there.. I just haven't been able to find it.

    So here's the thing.. I am 5' 11" about 190-200 lbs according to what I've read I should be on a 18" frame, yet all my wally world suck bikes have been 26".

    I can understand for DH purposes smaller frame allows easier maneuvering and tighter turning and all that.. I think?

    What's the dealio? I've sat on smaller frame bikes before and they just seem to look ridiculous.. Like a kid on a monkey bike! ..Well, not that bad.. But the scale seems off..

    Additionally, as you all probably know, and I have come to accept.. There are no real bikes in a 26" frame size. So anyway, if someone can fill in the blanks as to why that would be great.

    Also.. I'm not looking to do a whole lot of hardcore trail action since my current bike sees more road use then about anything.. Would it hurt to get a 20 - 21" frame bike? or is that a big no no. ??

    Thanks!!

    -Matt

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    My Bikes
    1998 Trek 7000, 2007 Surly Crosscheck, 2008 GT Peace 9r Multi
    Posts
    114
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I guess I'll tackle this one...

    You're looking at 2 different measurements and assuming that they are one in the same.

    18" is the size of the frame, typically measured from the center of the bottom bracket to the top of the seat tube (sometimes measured to the center).

    26" refers to the wheel size. Most mountain bikes use 26" wheels, although 29" wheeled bikes are becoming more popular.

    Given you size (and having no idea about your legs vs. torso measurements) I'd say you should look in the 18"-20" range. If you plan to do "hardcore" trail riding, you'll want to stay on the smaller end of the scale so that your "boys" don't bounce of the top tube too much on impact.
    ___________________________
    1998 Trek 7000
    2007 Surly Cross Check
    2007 On One Inbred 29er
    2009 GT Peace 9r Multi

  3. #3
    XMart- Embrace the Wobble
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    That's good information.. I figured there was some fallacy in comparing the two measurements. That seems similar to the whole 4:3 vs. 16:9 TV measurement, and for wally world to market in that way is not surprising in the least.

    If anyone else wants to chime in, I'm all ears.

    -Matt

  4. #4
    Official Website Waterboy born2bahick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    My Bikes
    a lot
    Posts
    3,271
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Firstly, yes wally world bikes are sized by the tire size, the frame is a one size fit's all.
    Next, a smaller frame allows more standover, is usually stiffer than the same frame in a larger size, and is generally easier to throw around. At 5' 11" Any where from a 17.5 to a 19.5 should work, but fit is determine by other factors than just standover height, so a trip to your local bike shop is probably the best place to get the answers your looking for.
    As for the 20/21 inch frame, If this was a road bike you could get away with it, but on the trail, I like more standover height. Especilly if you like to try new challenges, that aren't always cleaned the first try.
    Obviously I can't size you over the internet, So please treat this as an example

    EDIT: nevermind, someone already beat me to it!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fairmont WV
    My Bikes
    GT Ricochet, Mongoose Villain
    Posts
    132
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I am 5'10" and ride an 18" GT Riochet. GT's tend to be longer though (at least when I got mine in 1994) and I probubly could use a 16". I rode a 16" Giant over the weekend and at first it felt tiny but after getting adjusted to it it worked well for me. Go test ride a few different sizes and see what you like, who knows you may end up with a 16" 29'er

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto & Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Ellsworth Id
    Posts
    964
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by whitephatt View Post
    That's good information.. I figured there was some fallacy in comparing the two measurements. That seems similar to the whole 4:3 vs. 16:9 TV measurement, and for wally world to market in that way is not surprising in the least.

    If anyone else wants to chime in, I'm all ears.

    -Matt

    Yep...Frame sizes are usually indicated by the seat tube length, but a lot of mfg's are now using S, M, L, XL to designate the size. It's much more meaningfull as each mfg has their own specs, and the seat tube varies with the geometry of the bike.

    The most critical measurement on the bike is the top tube length...buying the wrong size can cause a lot of pain.

    I ride a medium frame...and have medium bikes with 17", 19", 20", and 21" seat tubes...all fit me well because they have a 23" top tube (the variable here is the head tube length which dictates the size of the front triangle)...my 17" is HUGE...the saddle comes up to my wife's shoulder

    At 5'11", you'd probably ride a medium, but it depends on your build. You have to sit on them to know what works best

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Middleton, Nova Scotia, Canada
    My Bikes
    2007 Norco Katmandu, building a 2006 Norco Bigfoot
    Posts
    684
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Here's an analogy for you:

    Buying a bike from Wal-Mart is like buying a pair of jeans that's one size fits all.

    I hope that helps you to understand more about real bikes.
    Live to ride, Ride to live

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto & Wasaga Beach, Ontario, Canada
    My Bikes
    Ellsworth Id
    Posts
    964
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by norco_rider77 View Post
    Here's an analogy for you:

    Buying a bike from Wal-Mart is like buying a pair of jeans that's one size fits all.

    I hope that helps you to understand more about real bikes.
    no kidding...here's a pic of my 17" medium
    Attached Images Attached Images

  9. #9
    XMart- Embrace the Wobble
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    11
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    When I think of 'one size fits all pants' I always think of those elastic ones. hahaha

    -Matt

  10. #10
    Peace boyvirgil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    136
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by whitephatt View Post
    When I think of 'one size fits all pants' I always think of those elastic ones. hahaha

    -Matt
    awww that reminds me of my grandma

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •