Advertise on Bikeforums.net



User Tag List

View Poll Results: Do you like hardtails or full-suspension bikes?

Voters
50. You may not vote on this poll
  • Full-Suspension

    20 40.00%
  • Hardtail

    30 60.00%
Results 1 to 24 of 24
  1. #1
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Toronto Ontario
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Poll

    This is a poll asking whether or not you like a hardtail or full-suspension bike.

    By the way I'm a newbie from Toronto Ontario. I like biking and I have a Kona Blast.

  2. #2
    Wood Licker Maelstrom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Whistler,BC
    My Bikes
    Transition Dirtbag, Kona Roast 2002 and specialized BMX
    Posts
    16,889
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    What if you like both?...right now I prefer a ht...but that will probably change :d

  3. #3
    Senior Member superjoe95's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    St, Catharines, Ontario
    Posts
    156
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i like HT but FS look purrrrdy

  4. #4
    Yes that's Me lamajo25's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Payson AZ
    Posts
    260
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    My understanding with FS, is when you are doing up hill climbing you lose valuable power with the excess bounce of the bike. They are great on Downhill and depending on how hard you like the rear suspension decent on level ground. For any type of up hill or trail riding where there is more of a chance of up hill the rear suspension defeats some of the momentum of pedaling. Now that's just what I've heard.

  5. #5
    7 inch Weagle skdsl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Townsville NQ Australia
    Posts
    185
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    i like both, and I just upgraded to fs. As far as climbing, I think i can climb better on the fs as it gets better traction on the rough climbs. Excess bounce? Never!
    05 Rocky Mountain ETS-X50 05 Ironhorse 7Point5 04 Ironhorse Glory Townsville Rockwheelers

  6. #6
    Pain Cleanseth Feltup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The only drug in me is beer.
    My Bikes
    On*One Imbred (commuter), Specialized Rockcombo(commuter)
    Posts
    1,066
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hardtail=Pure
    It is better to lose clean then win dirty. Don't ride dirty

  7. #7
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,082
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by lamajo25
    My understanding with FS, is when you are doing up hill climbing you lose valuable power with the excess bounce of the bike. They are great on Downhill and depending on how hard you like the rear suspension decent on level ground. For any type of up hill or trail riding where there is more of a chance of up hill the rear suspension defeats some of the momentum of pedaling. Now that's just what I've heard.
    Applesauce if you get one of the better designs out there (ie: Specialized FSR, Giant NRS) or any of the myriad of "cheaters" out there that rely on a "platform valve" (Giant VT new Intense, even the Specialized Epic) you'll have as good or better climbing with FS than a hardtail. Suspension soaks up the bumps and rocks etc that throw a HT out of contact with the ground. It's pretty hard to be an efficient climber when your drive wheel isn't on the ground

  8. #8
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,082
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by Feltup
    Hardtail=Pure
    Pure? Stinky Applesauce! You want pure go with a full rigid singlespeed with a coaster brake like they did at Repack. Why's it called "Repack"? Because that's what you did when you got to the bottom - repacked your hub with grease to go do it again. Now THAT"S f'in pure!
    Last edited by Raiyn; 09-01-03 at 01:30 AM.

  9. #9
    Pedalphile BurlySurly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Tennessee
    My Bikes
    better ones than yours
    Posts
    514
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I have 2 Hts and 2 Fs's, each of them are perfect for their specific kind of riding. There is no "which one is better" its all about intended use.

    Now, if you posted a poll that said HT or FS for 4X, then, we could have a debate
    Dont PM me.

  10. #10
    Pain Cleanseth Feltup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The only drug in me is beer.
    My Bikes
    On*One Imbred (commuter), Specialized Rockcombo(commuter)
    Posts
    1,066
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I know a HT with front suspension, v-brakes and 27 speeds is not the most pure bike experiance one can have, but in todays market it is pure.
    It is better to lose clean then win dirty. Don't ride dirty

  11. #11
    NCAA - DUAL CHAMPIONS! a2psyklnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2000
    Location
    From Sarasota, FL sitting in front of a computer spewing random thoughts!
    My Bikes
    Intense Uzzi SL, Masi Speciale, Trek 3700 Nashbar Single Speed, Old Cilo Road frame
    Posts
    7,972
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I've gotta agree, it depends on the conditions, intended use...etc.

    However, I like riding my full squishy much more, and more often than my hardtail!

    L8R
    "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "WOW, What a Ride!" - unknown
    "Your Bike Sucks" - Sky Yaeger

  12. #12
    Nut Job jedi_rider's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    517
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    out here in San Diego, a full suspension is the way to go. better for climbs and DHs. i never experienced the loss of energy from bouncing except for out on ashpalt, but i rarely go on that stiuff with the mtb. besides, my bike has manual lockout suspension so i can switch anytime i want---you might want to look for the same.
    Any time I'm going up a hill, I know I'm headed in the right direction.

  13. #13
    Back in the Sooner State
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Norman, OK
    Posts
    2,572
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Steel hardtail.

    BUt if I ever convince myself to do a MTB century, I'll change my vote.

  14. #14
    Superman With Silver Guns bbarend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    My Bikes
    Trek 2100, Cannondale MTB, Fetish SS
    Posts
    220
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Hardtail, it is much easier to sprint up hill on a HT. If you do true freeride then a FS, but most people buy a FR rig and ride only XC. As far as technical descents, there is nothing better than passing a bling bling full suspension bike on a stiff aluminum hardtail. Most people who recommend full suspension for XC are the same ones who look at what name is on your bike first thing. I have owned both and after one season traded my FS in on a HT.
    "I'm your huckleberry."

    MTB, SS MTB, and Road

  15. #15
    Crank Crushing Redneck SamDaBikinMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    A van down by the river.
    My Bikes
    Bikes are environmentally damaging
    Posts
    2,600
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    HT = Speed.

    FS = Comfort and better control on descents.

    FS with lockout = best of both worlds.

    Poll has too few options to get accurate feedback.

    I traded out of a long travel fulll suspension this year to a shorter travel with lockout and I love the options when hammering the local trail. I did take the front fork off the old FS and put it on a hardtail frame. Still due to test ride it.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  16. #16
    Proud to Be Cornish! Transparent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    England UK
    Posts
    227
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I prefer ht's.... much more fun.... more challenging and alot less maintenence and stuff to go wrong
    Your Soul may belong to Jesus but your ass is MINE!

    Specialized '04 Hardrock Sport Disc

  17. #17
    Part of the furniture math2p14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Exeter UK, Athens Greece.
    My Bikes
    Specialized RH, Scott Unitrack
    Posts
    930
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    HT PURE!
    Where the skid marks stop...the tree begins....:D:D:D:D:D

  18. #18
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Ojai, CA
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I prefer a FS w/ lockout. In socal, its ROUGH. I have a short travel FS and i love it

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,012
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    HT all the way.
    Haven't found a FS that climbs quicker than my CAAD4 yet. When that day arrivs I'll consider a FS.
    More traction on the climbs??!! I think thats a perception. I seem to get loads of traction with my HT. All depends on posture and positioning and gearing.
    In the ring that I do most of my climbing in the suspension bobs (middle ring). This gets ebven worse in the smaller ring.

    Only FS i've liked thus far for XC are the Scalpel and Epic.
    An ounce off the wheels is worth 3 off the frame

  20. #20
    Proud to Be Cornish! Transparent's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    England UK
    Posts
    227
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    biggest ring on the middle cog on the cassete will give u plenty of grip.... and as long as ur not balancing over the handlebars it should grip reasonably well....
    Your Soul may belong to Jesus but your ass is MINE!

    Specialized '04 Hardrock Sport Disc

  21. #21
    Pain Cleanseth Feltup's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    The only drug in me is beer.
    My Bikes
    On*One Imbred (commuter), Specialized Rockcombo(commuter)
    Posts
    1,066
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    FS can hide a lot of sins.

    I don't think socal is the only place with "rough" trails. The trails get pretty rough here in the south too.
    It is better to lose clean then win dirty. Don't ride dirty

  22. #22
    I drink your MILKSHAKE Raiyn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Location
    St. Petersburg, FL
    My Bikes
    2003 Specialized Rockhopper FSR Comp, 1999 Specialized Hardrock Comp FS, 1971 Schwinn Varsity
    Posts
    15,082
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Originally posted by math2p14
    HT PURE!
    FIRE BAD!



    See earlier post: Singlespeed Rigid THAT"S PURE

  23. #23
    7 inch Weagle skdsl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Townsville NQ Australia
    Posts
    185
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    seems to be different ideas of what a hard climb actually is. The climbs around here are steep enough that you would need to be very strong to use middle ring. They also have ruts and rocks to deal with. Most people use their lowest gear (22/32) but I find i use one maybe two up from this.
    I want to put my HT back together to use on road climbs as it is more efficient when the terrain is smooth, but in the rough stuff I find the FS better. I do use the middle ring for road climbs. (most common 32/21)
    05 Rocky Mountain ETS-X50 05 Ironhorse 7Point5 04 Ironhorse Glory Townsville Rockwheelers

  24. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    1,012
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    on the steep around my trails back in SA, the middle ring is something you use if you have a 2x9 system, then your fs works well on climbs. Otherwise a lockout of EPIC is the way to go.
    Traction is always provided by correct positioning over the bike.
    An ounce off the wheels is worth 3 off the frame

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •